Full text of "Judaism and Islam. A prize essay"

See other formats

FRAGILE P.\PER
Please handle this book
with care, as the paper
is brittle.

ISM- AND ISLAM

113

FRAGILE DOES NOl
CIRCULATE

THE GIFT OF

K.\^\^55 cv\vo\oo

Date Due

NoV24''*^

juir^-nazs-

mJ-^-H^m

1 S 135:

-«&4

435t

Q£(rXT^^»- 2 0

/^/^

UiAA,

gg£

n fi •

^- ^9.s.? T) yg

•JA^-^'

^nttM^

— -««yt?*^

-?*»-

iiiiii;4/tA+e-

The original of tliis book is in
tlie Cornell University Library.

There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.

http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029170236

JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

A PRIZE ESSAY

ABEAHAM GEIGEE,

Ea66i at Wieaiaden.

TEANSIATED FEOM THE GEEMAN BY A MEMBEE OF THE
LADIES' LEAGUE IN AID OF THE DELHI MISSION.

PRINTED AT THE M.D.C.S.P.C.K. PRESS,
AND SOLD AT THEIR DEPOSITORY, VEPBRT.

1898,

-^-q-5?^-^^^

^. WV^^S"

TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.

I undertook to translate this Prize Essay by the
Eabbi Geiger at the request of the Rev. Gr. A. Lef roy,
the Head of the Cambridge Mission at Delhi, who
thought that an English translation of the book
would be of use to him in his dealings with
Muhammadans. The Eev. H. D. Griswold of the
American Presbyterian Mission at Lahore has very
kindly put in all the Hebrew and Arabic citations
for me, and has also revised my translation.

P. M. YOUNG.

Bangalore,

March 17th, 1896.

PREFACE

I VENTURE to offer to the general public a work which
was primarily undertaken with somewhat scanty materials.
The question propounded by the Philosophical Faculty
at Bonn, viz., " Inquiratur in fontes Alcorani seu legis
Mohammeddcae eas, qui ex Judaismo derivandi sunt,"
served as an inducement to the undertaking. The point of
view from which the subject was to be approached was left
by the terms of the question entirely to the different
workers j and that from which I have regarded it must be
considered, in order that a right judgment upon my essay
may be formed. It is assumed that Muhammad borrowed
from Judaism, and this assumption, as will be shewn later,
is rightly based. In this connection everything of course
is excluded which appears only in the later development
of Islam, and of which no trace can be met with in the
Qur£n ; but on the other hand all such religious ideas and
legends as are hinted at in the Quran, and are explained
and developed at the hands of later writers, deserve and
receive consideration. Secondly, a comparison between
Jewish sayings, and those of the Quran, in the hope of
setting forth the former as the source of the latter, can
take place only on condition that the Jewish sayings are
actually found in Jewish writings prior to Islam ; or
unless it is certain that such sayings, though only recently
recorded, existed earlier in the synagogue.

But this certainty cannot easily be attained, and historical
criticism must find its doubt as to this the more deeply
rooted in proportion to the number of times in which the
sayings are found among those of other creeds, from which
there is probability that they were adopted. Thirdly,
those who undertake this work must consider seriously the

Vi PEEFACB.

question, whether a mere similarity in the tenets of two
different religious sects establishes the fact that an adoption
from one into the other has taken place. There are so
many general religious ideas that are common to several of
the positive religions existent at the time of the rise of
Muhammadanism, that we must be very careful not to
assert rashly that any one idea found in the Quran is taken
from Judaism.

I have therefore given in the different sections the marks
and indications, and in the case of some points of greater
difficulty, the reasons also, from which I believe myself
justified in the conjecture that there has been such a
borrowing.

For these three reasons many citations which I might
have made from later Islam and later Judaism are excluded,
and in like manner many statements also, which do not
bear the impress of a borrowing.

On the other hand, the first division had to be added, in
order to shew the basis on which the probability of a
general borrowing from Judaism rests. After I had once
settled the subject in this way, the arrangement of the whole,
and more especially of the many disconnected divisions
and sub-divisions, gave me no less trouble. The borrow-
ings are of details not of anything comprehensive ; they
are fragmentary and occasional in that they were chosen
according to what Muhammad's reporters knew, and
according to what was agreeable to the prophet's individual
opinion and aim, consequently there is no close connection.
How far I have succeeded in reducing these details to
order the reader may see and judge from the book itself.

The materials at my disposal, when I first undertook
this work, were only the bare Arabic text of the Qurdn in
Hinckelmann's edition from which the quotations are made,*

* In the translation tlie quotations are made from Fluegel's edition.

PREFACE. Vll

Wahl's Translation of the Qur£n, and an intimate acquaint-
ance with Judaism and its writings. A transcript from
Baidhawi's Commentary on the Quran on some passages in
the second and third Surahs, which Professor Freytag made
for himself and which he with his usual kindness allowed
me to use, , was the only help outside the Qurdn. I had
thus the advantage of having an unbiassed mind ; not, on
the one hand, seeing the passages through the spectacles
of the Arabian commentators, nor on the other finding in
the Qurdn the views of the Arabian dogmatists, and
the narratives of their historians. I had besides the
pleasure of finding out independently many obscure
allusions, and explaining them correctly, as I afterwards
learned from Arabic writings. In this form my work
i^eceived the prize, and only after that had been gained was
I able to collect more materials, and to use them for the
remodelling of the work in German. To these belong
especially the valuable Prodromi and Comments of Maraccius
in his edition of the Quran, the Commentary of Baidhawi
on the loth Surah (in Henzei's Fragmenta Arabica), and two
parts of an excellent unpublished Commentary by Elpherar
which begins with the 7th Surah and was bought by the
famous Seetzen at Cairo in 1807, and is now in the library
at G-otha, whence I received it through the kind mediation
of Professor Freytag at the expense of the University
Library at Bonn. To these may be added Abulfedse
Annales Maslemitici and Eistoria Anteislamica, the works
of Pococke, D'Herbelot's Bibliotheque Orientale, and
many other works which will be found quoted in the book
itself. All observations drawn from writings to which
I first obtained access while the work was in the press
are given in an Appendix. The advantages of a three-fold
register, viz., of the explained Arabic and Eabbinical
words, of the cited passages of the Quran, and of quotations
from other Arabic authors (with the exception of the

Vm PEEFAOl.

constantly-quoted Blpherar and Maraccius) need not be
dwelt upon in detail. The Jewish writings which I have
used consist almost entirely of the Bible, the Talmud, and
the Midrashim, and in accordance with my determination
to reject all Jewish writings later than Muhammad's time,
they had to be thus limited. The few passages which are
taken from other writings, of which the age is not so
exactly known, such as the sections of Eabbi Elieser, the
Book Hayydshdr, and the two differing Eecensions of the
Jerusalem Targum on the Pentateuch (which are placed in
a somewhat later period than that of the composition of
the Quran by the learned Zunz in his latest valuable
work Die Gottesdienstlichen Vortrdge der Juden historisch
entwickelt : Berlin, 1832, A. Asher) are all of such a kind
that one can generally point to some decided declaration
in Holy Scripture itself from which such opinions and tra-
ditions may have arisen, and therefore their priority of
existence in Judaism can be accepted without hesitation.

I must publicly offer my thanks to Professor Preytag
for the many different kindnesses he has shown me in
connection with this work, and also to my dear friends
S. Prensdorf and J. Dernburg for their help in the correc-
tion of the proofs. Pinally, I here express my heartfelt
wish that this little work may be true to the spirit of our
time, the striving after true knowledge, and that learned
men may give me the benefit of their criticisms upon it.

THE AUTHOR.

Wiesbaden,

May 12th, 1833.

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Page
Intkoduction ... ... ... ... ... 1

First Division.

First Section. — Did Muhammad wish to borrow from

Judaism? ... ... ... ... ... 4

Second Section. — Could Muhammad borrow from
Judaism ? and if so, how was such borrowing
possible for him ? ... ... ... ... 17

Third Section. — Was it compatible with his plan to

borrow from Judaism ? ... ... ... 21

Second Division.

First Section. — Did Muhammad borrow from Judaism ? 26
''' Second Section. — If so, what did he borrow ? ... 29

~ Chapter I. — Thoughts belonging to Judaism

which have passed over into the Quran ... 30
^First Part. — Conceptions borrowed from

Judaism ... ... ... ... 20

■*■ Second Part. — Views borrowed from Judaism —

A. Doctrinal Views ... 45

B. Moral and Legal Rules ... 64

C. Views of Life ... ... 70

Chapter II. — Stories borrowed from Judaism , ... 73

First Part. — Patriarchs. — A. Adam to Noah ... 75

B. Noah to Abraham. 83

C. Abraham to Moses. 95
Second Part. — Moses and his Times ... ... 118

Third Part.— The Three Kings before the

Revolt of Ten Tribes ... ... ... 143

Fourth Part. — Holy men after the time of
Solomon ... ... ••• ... 151

X CONTENTS.

Appendix. — Statements in the Quran hostile to Jadaism .., 157

Index. — List of Passages cited from the Quran ... 163

Do. do. Sunna ... 170

The chief Authors cited ... ... ... 170

CORRIQ ENDA.

For

eas

Page

V line

ead

eos

i»

Henzei's

„

VII

Henzii

))

Maslemitioi

»)

VII

»>

Moslemitici

' A bid ben *Umr

)}

11 note

(I-

})

' Abid ben ' Umya

Sura XII

(1-

))

Sura VII

28
31

Nab

{'■

0 0

Transpose &^\i\ and ^

))

„

For

))

Ql?

»)

^■^

»>

„

l?5?n

»)

"i?3?n

inatij

»i

(1.

mt£7

>»

3n33ti7

2n?3t£7

ins la

)»

Derabbi

Rabbi

ITQ

i-?a

'fij"i''"]nN"!

))

»j

(P.

56)

Trn^ins"!

III. ' 2

))

111. 2

LXXIX. U ff.

))

LXXIX. 1 ff.

7^?3

»,

vaa

))

""o.':?'

»)

('•

"ia^5

iuij;

„

'*^jj

even to

110

line

as also did

sbs

138

note

(1.

Mv',^

T :

138

»>

(1.

na^teri

J»

V^^

146

T^^P

rri^a

147

nT3

De^eifl self

158

line

JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

INTRODUCTION.

It will be found, speaking generally of tte whole sphere of
human thought, whether we consider matters which have
already become the clear and certain possession of mankind,
or those which are left for the future to unveil and to
determine with scientific precision, that almost always
a correct intuition precedes scientific knowledge, so that
a generally correct idea, though not yet supported by
adequate evidence, obtains some hold on the minds of
men. In this way the thesis of this treatise has long been
recognised as probable, namely that Muhammad in his
Quran has borrowed much from Judaism as it presented
itself to him in his time, though for this opinion no
sufiicient grounds have hitherto been advanced. And the
very endeavour to give this just conjecture its place among
scientific certainties seems to have produced in the faculty
the wish to see the subject accurately and thoroughly worked
out by scholars, conversant with both the Quran and
Judaism in their original sources ; and to meet this wish I
take up my present task, conscious indeed of feeble powers,
but determined to use unsparing industry in the steadfast
pursuit of my purpose. This is the end which we have in
view, to wit, a scientific presentation, and not a mere list
of apparent adaptations from Judaism, nor a statement
of isolated facts dissevered from their historical connec-
tions. For this we must study the connection of the facts
to be demonstrated with the whole life and work of Muham-
mad, as well as with those events of his time, which either

^ JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

determiBed his actions or were determined by him. And
so this treatise falls into two divisionsj of which the first
has to answer the following questions : —

Did Muhammad wish to borrow from .Judaism ? Could
Muhammad borrow from Judaism ? and if so, how was such
borrowing possible for him ? Was it compatible with his
plan to borrow from Judaism ? The second division must
bring forward the facts to prove the borrowing, which has
been stated on general grounds to have taken place. Only
in this way can an individual proof of the kind referred to
acquire scientific value, partly as throwing light upon the
nature of Muhammad's plan, and partly as showing the
intrinsic necessity of the fact and its actual importance by
virtue of its connection with other facts of Muhammad's
life and age. To this an appendix will be added, in which
will be given a collection of those passages in which
Muhammad seems not so much to have borrowed from
Judaism, as to have reviewed it and that too in a hostile
spirit.

EBLATION OP JUDAISM TO ISLAM.

FIRST DIVISION.

Did Muhammad wish to borrow from Judaism ? Could Muham-
mad borrow from Judaism ? and if so, how was such
borrowing possible for him ? Was it compatible with
Muhammad's plan to borrow from Judaism ?

It is not enough for us to give a dry meagre summary
of the passages which appear to have some connection
with .Judaism, in order to shew that Muhammad really
possessed a certain knowledge of it, and used it in the
establishment of his new religion, and that, further, a
comparison with it makes clear many passages in the
Quran. Rather is it our task to shew how it was bound up
with the spirit, the striving and the aims of Muhammad, with
the mind of his time and the constitution of his surround-
ings, and thus to demonstrate the fact that, even were we
deprived of all proofs which undeniably shew Judaism to
be a source of the Qur^n, the conjecture that a borrowing
from Judaism had taken place would still have great
probability. Thus it is necessary for us first to account
for this as the philosophical development of a process,
afterwards to be confirmed by historical evidence.
Three questions come prominently forward here : —

First : Did Muhammad really think he would gain
any object by borrowing from Judaism ? or, in other words,
Did'Muhammad of set purpose borrow from .Judaism ?

Second : Had Muhammad means, and what means had
he, of attaining to a knowledge of Judaism ? ^. e., Could he
thus borrow ? and if so, how was it possible for him ?

Third : Were there not other circumstances which
militated against, or at all events limited such a borrowing ?

JODAISU AND ISLAM.

Was it compatible with the rest of his plan so to borrow ?
Was it permissible for him^ and if so on what grounds ?

These three enquiries form the different Sections of the
first division.

FiBST Section.
Did Muhammad wish to borrow from Judaism ?

Although we may by no means ascribe to Muhammad a
special liking for the Jews and for Judaism and indeed in his
life, as well as in the writings which he left behind him as
laws for posterity, there are traces of hatred against
both ; — still it is evident that, on the one hand, the power
which the Jews had obtained in Arabia was important
enough for him to wish to have them as adherents and, on
the other, that they were, though themselves ignorant, far
in advance of other religious bodies * in that knowledge
which Muhammad professed to have received by Divine
revelation,^ as indeed he liked to assert of all his knowledge.
The Jews, moreover, gave him so much trouble with witty
and perplexing remarks that the wish to propitiate them
must certainly have arisen in him.

That the Jews in Arabia at the time of Muhammad posses-
sed considerable power is shown by the free life of many
quite independent tribes, which sometimes met him in open
battle. This fact is known especially of the Banu Qainuqa' '
in the second or third year of the Hijra, also of the Banu
Nadhir* in the 4th year. The latter are spoken of by

'See Jost's Gesohiohte dea israelitisohen Volkes, Vol. II. pp. 207. li.

' Sura XXIX. 47 uii-*!? ^^ Sj >_.bS' ^ iLi ^ ^ i^ \^ J

' ThoD didst not read any book before this, neither couldest thou write
it with thy right hand." (i. b., the Word of God). Sale's Translation.

'gU^i yu Abulfeda (Vita Moljammedis ed. Gagnier, p. 67).

^ «Ja> y^ In Pooooke (Specimen Historiae Arabum p. 11) y:^ See

also Commentators on Sura lix. and also Vita Mojjammedis p. 71.

POWER OP THE JEWS. O

Janab as a great family of the Jews, l This fact is further
kaown of the Jews in Khaibar 2 with whom he fought in
the 7th year. The Banu Nadhir are supposed to be referred
to in Quran lix. 2. They are there described as so powerful
that the Muslims despaired of their conquest, and the
fastnesses which they possessed would have banished
thoughts of a capture, if as Muhammad with probable exag-
geration expresses it, they themselves had not destroyed
their houses with their own hands, or if, as Abulf eda with
greater historical probability asserts, they, fearing a long
siege, had not withdrawn themselves and turned to quieter
regions. The want of settled civil life, which continued in
Arabia till the rule of Muhammad, was very favourable to the
Jews, who had fled to that country in large numbers after the
Destruction of Jerusalem, inasmuch as it enabled them to
gather together and to maintain their independence. A
century before Muhammad, this independence had reached
such a pitch that among the Himyarites the Jewish ruler
actually had jurisdiction over those who were not Jews ; and
it was only the mistaken zeal of the last Jewish Governor,
Dhu Nawis,^ which led him to a cruel attempt to suppress
other creeds (which attempt is pictured for us with the
very colours of a martyrologist), that brought about
the fall of the Jewish throne by the coming of the
Christian Abyssinian King.* Although it seems to me
altogether improbable that the passage in Quran Ixxxv.
4 refers to this event, partly because of the indefin-
iteness of the allusion and partly because on this supposition
the Christians are called " the believers," 5 which is never
the case elsewhere, though as a rule Muhammad's treatment

•Jjfl-c^^ (J'" '/i'^

' j*^ Pco. Spea p. 11.

* Comp. Assemani Bibliotheca Orientalis I. 361 pp. and Michaelis
Syrisohe Clirestomathie p. 19 fl.
5 Qurdn LXXXV. 7. oy>^^

6 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

of the Christians was iadulgent ; and altliougK I give an
entirely different interpretation to this passage — an interpre-
tation borne out by every word, 1 nevertheless this very
mistake of the commentators shews the importance which
the Arabs attached to this conquest of the Jewish ruler,
a,nd is a proof of the greatness of his former power. That
the remains of such a power, even when shattered continued
to be of importance is plain in itself, and is moreover
clearly shown in a passage soon to be quoted,^ where
the Himyarites are depicted as particularly unbelieving.
An Arabian author 3 mentions other tribes beside the
Himyarites as adherents of Judaism, viz., the Banu Kindna
Banu Hareth ben Kab, and Kinda. *

While this physical power of the Jews inspired partly
fear, partly respect in Muhammad's mind, he was no less
afraid of their mental superiority and of appearing to them
as ignorant ; and so his first object must have been to
conciliate them by an apparent yielding to their views.
That the Jewish system of belief was even then a fully
developed one, which penetrated the life of each member of
the community, is proved both by its antiquity and by the
fact that the Talmud had already been completed. Though
the Jews of that region were among the most, ignorant, as is
shown by the silence of the Talmud concerning them, and
also by that which was borrowed from them and incorporated

' See Division II, Section II, Chapter II, Part IV.

* Baidh4wi on Quran II. 91.
' Vide Pooooke Spec. p. 136.

* A good voucher for the importance to whicli 8ome Jewish families had
attained might be found in a poem of Hamasa (ed. Freytag p. 49), which
is full of the spirit of chivalry and self reliance, if only the evidence that
the family referred to was a, Jewish one were sufficiently certain. The

only thing for it is the name of the author Jo..»-J\ which, as a commen-
tator cited by Blpherar remarks, is a Hebrew name(Joj.« — !\oHa3\ ^\ J^ J>
^jo (_/«>Jj o*V<* (***^) ''°'' ^^^"'i might easily have come into use
among the Arabs. Even in the verae VS^ifc page 52, where the pure and
unmixed descent of the family is praised, and where one might expect a
Baontion of its Jewish origin, no such allusion is found.

INTELLIGENCE OF THE JEWS. 7

in the Quran, yet very many traditions and pithy sayings
survived in the mouth of the people, which doubtless gave
to the Jews an appearance of intellectual superiority in
those dark times and regions of ignorance, and so gained
for them honour in the sight of others. Thus it came
about naturally that Muhammad wanted to learn their
views and to include them in his community. It was not
only the idea of swelling his society with these numbers
of adherents ' that produced this wish in him, but also
the way in which they defended their own cause and their
mode of dealing with him. The fact that Muhammad
very often came off second best in religious disputes is
evident from several sayings, and particularly from the
following very decided one : — " When thou seest those
who busy themselves with cavilling at Our signs, depart
from them until they busy themselves in some other
subject; and if Satan cause thee to forget this precept, 2
do not sit with the ungodly people after recollection."
This remarkably strong statement, in which he makes God
declare it to be a work of the devil to be present at
controversies about the truth of his mission, shews how
much Muhammad had to fear from argument. Intercourse
with the Jews appeared to him to be dangerous for his
Muslims also, and he warns them against too frequent
communication or too close intimacy with the Jews. 3 He
naturally puts this forward on grounds, other than the
right ones ; but the real reason for the warning is obvi-
ously that Muhammad feared the power of the Jews to
shake the faith of others in the religion revealed to him.4

" An inheritance for the aasembly of Jacob." Deut. xxxiii. 4,
' yluliT i3l,£Lv^ C\^ Sura VI. 67.

* Sura LX. 13, On this Elpherar remarks :

8 JDDAISM AND ISLAM.

Most characteristically, and doubtless quite in accordance
with the intellectual manner of the Jews, this is shown in
a witty and satirical play of question and answer, about
which Muhammad complains bitterly, and which often
gave him apparent weapons against the Jews, in that he
regarded their utterances as bona fide expressions of
opinion and not as mere teasing mockeries.

Thus, in order to gain reputation, and also because
he was under the impression that, if some (he says ten)
of the Jews would join him, all the rest would become
his adherents,! he made the attempt with some, who either
did not have the courage to withstand him, or else did not
wish to enter upon a long dispute with him. They either
got rid of hitn with an answer which he could not gainsay, or
they mixed up the words which he required from them with
others of similar sound, but of different and even contrary
meaning. Thus they said to him once : — " we can do nothing
for our unbelief, for our hearts are uncircumcised." 2 On
another occasion they advised him to go to Syria, as the
only place where prophetic revelations were possible, accor-
ding to the Jewish saying : 3 " Prophecy is not found out
side the Holy Land." This is given by some expositors
as the cause for the revelation in Sura XVII. 78'^, but
others assign a different reason for the verse. Further the

" This (was revealed) because some of the poor Muslims instructed the
Jews in the doctrine of the Muslims, so that there was unity between
them and the former received of the fruits of the latter."
^ Comp. Suuna iib, Pundgruben des Orients, Vol. I. p. 286.

» Sura II. 82 waic Uj^ =13n3« 37 "OnV Comp. Deut. x. 16.
" Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart and be no more
stiffneoked."

• V T T T ; T T : " • -•

* JaUlu'd-din (Maracoi in loco),

" This verse was revealed when the Jews said ; If thou art a Prophet,
then go to Syria, for Syria alone is the land of prophets." So Elpheraretal.

GiDEIEL AND MICHAEL. 9

commentators cheerily relate many anecdotes by way of
explaining the reason for certain passages, which appear to
the unprejudiced quite in the same light. As the occasion of
Quran II. 91, Baidhawi relates the following tale:* " It is
said that Omar went once into a school 2 of the Jews and
asked them about Gabriel. They replied : ' He is our enemy,
he reveals our secrets toMuhammad, he is also the messenger
of wrath and punishment ; Michael on the contrary brings
us prosperity and plenty.' Then Omar said : ' What is
their position with regard to God ?' and the Jews replied :
' Gabriel on His right and Michael on His left, but
between these two there is enmity.' But he said : ' God
forbid that it should be as you say ; they are not enemies,
but you are more unbelieving than the Himyariks.3
Whosoever is the enemy of either angel, he is the enemy of
God.' Then Omar went away and found that Gabriel
had preceded him with a revelation, and Muhammad said
to him, ' Thy Lord has already agreed with thee, O

Omar.' "

Although what is here brought forward is to some
extent what is really held by the Jews, as e.g. that
Gabriel is the messenger of punishment,^ and although
accordingly there is much of truth in this narrative ; ■

._ftli Ji' ^^-^U, Sj\ ^ \ij\j~.\ Jlc \Ji*ay jlW. UjAc ieUo \^\ai

&13\ ^^ Ua^ji^ Uj JVai fX~i\ ^ w_~a^\ ^,-^\- ^}^ } ^^-^ )

* j*c U ueXjj i£\£i\ J JuiJ f,'i~^\ p 'iX^\ &-U; JUi

T ; •

' These are the words referred to above, p. 5.

*R. Salomo Ben Adereth on Tract Baba Bathra 74. 2.

y^_r\ n-ia Qpa bs? ^33 n3-;5b nainsi ^a^nan

10 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

nevertlieless even the quoted saying is perverted, for
Gabriel is regarded as the messenger of God for the
punishment of sinners only, and in another passage of the
Talmud ^ it is actually said of him that he is called the 2
one who stops up, because he stops up the sins of Israel i.e.,
wipes them away, and therefore he could never be
represented to the Israelites as their enemy.

Further, Muhammad's intentional misrepresentations is
shown by his changing the order assigned by the Jews to
the Angels. The Jews assert that Michael stands at
God's right hand and Gabriel on His left.* This position
is reversed by Muhammad, in order to give the highest rank
to Gabriel 5 to whom he attributes all his revelations. This

'niDq'^ N3 bw'^-iaa 3?|?-i|"5? I^^ni bw'^-iaa wa c-iasi? b^nsab

" Onr sages, blessed be their memory, attributed the execution of God's
punitive judgments to Gabriel, as, for instance, Gabriel came and over-
threw them in the earth (Sanhedrin 19. 1), and Gabriel came to destroy
Sodom." Comp. also Sanh. 21. 26. 95, 2. 96.

' Sanhedrin 44.

* These words must be taken in the sense explained at the end of the
8rd Section of the 1st Division,

* Comp. the evening prayer of the Jews.

Also the prayer on the Day of Atonement.

bban bsa'tsa b^n^i bbnia T^a^n bs^ia

'Comp. also Midrash Tanchuma Sect. tl?a^1 f. 21. c. 2. Venetian Ed.
1545, where it is written iriSJ bN^'^Q HT bttJan "iXSr inDJ bt»an

vai-'as nibtt; nwv na's ■<in n.v nw

" The verse Job, xxv. 2, ' Dominion and fear are with Him,' refers to
Michael and Gabriel, in that the former is made out of water, and the
latter out of fire ; still they do not hurt each other, because ' He maketh
peace in His high places.' " Here all the facts which we sought out
separately are given briefly. Michael is the milder, Gabriel the more
terrible, but they are nevertheless in perpetual harmony.

GABRIEL AND MICHAEL. 11

is in spite of tlie fact that tile other view is so fully in accord
with the spirit of the doctrine about angels as accepted by
the Jews, according to which the positions " on the right"
and " on the left " mean only the decision to adopt either
merciful or punitive measures. There can of course be
no question of enmity between Gabriel and the Jews, or
between Gabriel and Michael, and the speech is nothing
but a repartee, which however to Muhammad's thinking
justified him in making an accusacion against the Jews.
This is even more clearly shown in the following narrative
related by a commentator on the words " God is poor " l :
" Thus spoke the Jews when they had heard : — ' Who is he
that will lend unto God a goodly loan ?' Quran II. 246.
It is related that Muhammad with Abu Bakr had written to
the Jews of the Banu Qainuqa' calling them to Islam, to
faithful observance of prayer, to offer free will offerings
and to give God a good loan. Then Phineas the son of
Azariah 2 said : ' Then God is poor, that he desires a loan' ?
Abu Bakr boxed his ears and said : ' If there were not a

' Baidhawi on Qurfn III. 117.

l^i aBT y\ " God is poor."
-a tj

^jcJo, gValJ ^ J^ ^J\ &'C <sl3\^j ji} ^\ ^ '—^ (.l~!\j SS.a!\
J\,si \j-~=. U,yi m \yijSi tj\j£\9^ A:^\) £U^^U\j f.Ui\ J\

isii\ ^j ^^\ i*Ui ,J>jSi\ JU y-^ ^ Al3\ (j\ A)}^^ (^ i_/=W.U
j»*lo iii\ J^j ^^\ iSK^i d^^ uw_^ ^\ i^ UiJ U Sj3 .Uc

* Phineas the Bon of Azariah f n^"lV3? 13 DniD)> ^■^^ ^'^^^ *° whom
the utterance that Ezra is the son of God (ix. 30) is attributed by some.
i*-.\ J^\ t>- ^\, J=?-j iiWJ\ S.ii. ^\i US\ p^ (^ A^ ^\i

" ' Abid ben ' Umr says : Only one Jew used this expression, and that
was Phineas the son of Azariah, the same man who said : God is poor and
we are rich." (BIpherar on ix. 30.)

12 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

truce between us, I would Have broken your neck.' He
then took him bound to Muhammad, and Phineas denied
having made the speech. Then came this revelation."
The same thing is found in another passage 1 : " The Jews
say the hand of God is tied up." The meaningless character
of the sentence shews in itself that the Jews were not in
earnest ; and if we take into consideration the occasion of
the remark, and the way in which it was made, we shall see
clearly the teasing and scoflBng tendency of the Jews in
their dealings with Muhammad. It was an answer to
an expression, which in its simple meaning " To lend to
God" must have seemed to them ridiculous, and which
might easily give rise to the retort, " if God now needs
money. He must be poor." It was only by a certain amount
of distortion and mutilation that Muhammad could twist
this speech into an accusation against the Jews. A good
story is preserved for us in Sunna 608 which runs as
follows : " After the conquest of Khaibar the Jews set a
poisoned lamb before Muhammad. When he discovered
this, he had them called together, and putting them on
oath to tell him the truth, he asked if they had poisoned
the lamb. They confessed, and he then enquired, ' For
what reason ? ' 'To rid ourselves of you, if you are a
deceiver,' was their reply ; ' for if you are a prophet, poison
will do you no harm.' " Who can fail to see in this answer
a desire to free themselves from the importunity of
M uhammad by biting repartee ?

At other times they changed his words, or used words of
double meaning. In the prescribed salutation they said
indeed " Ea'ina," 2 but not in the sense intended by
Muhammad, viz., " look on us" ; but either in the sense of
" count us guilty, or with a play on the Hebrew " ra" in

1 Qurdn V, 69. 1&^\jJ, iSJiJT J* ij'^"! uiZiU}

» <Js.\l

COMPLAINT AGAINST THE JEWS. 13

the sense of the evil one." l So that he was obliged to
substitute " andhurna/' which also means " look on us."2
Further instead of hittat^, "forgiveness", they said
probably " Khatiat" *, " Sin." Jalalu'd-din 5 gives ano-
ther variation and says that instead of the required word
"hubbat", love, the Jews said " habbat fi sh'airat " i.e.,
" A grain in an ear of barley." Then they changed the
salutation "As-salam 'alaika" ^ i.e., " Peace be upon thee",
into " As-sam ''alaika" 7 which means " Mischief on thee,"^
and this is the ground of Muhammad's complaint in Surah
Iviii. 9. Such occurrences, though they led later to a
great hatred on his part towards the Jews, must at first,
while he still had a hope of converting them, have induced
him to try all possible means to conciliate them ; for they

ri "ro."

Jalilu'd -din says (ilaracoi in loco) :

&jy!j\ y« «_.^^ 0)6<!^^ ^i*l} }* ! " ^"^^ '''^'^ ^^ among the Jews a
word of reproach meaning folly."

2 \yfi^ Qiirin II. 98, IV. 48. 49.

3 E^ VII. 161, 162, II. 55, 56.

^SlLi

' Jalilu'd-din (Maracoj.)
i^ "habbat" i.e. love.

ij^jtJii L-» ili> " Ijabbat fi sh'airat " i.e. a grain in an ear of barley.

^ On this Elpherar commenta aa follows :

* iSXUc |«!LJ\ y^J^sj ^\ <yj*aji cL3^\jai |»UJ^^

The meaning "death" which Elpherar here aasigna to the word (.\_

ia quite foreign to it, as is also " contempt ", which is more appropriate fox

f^. The commentators appear, therefore, to have had in mind the Hebrew

word DD, which with niaU understood would mean " poison."

14 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

were not only important politically, but were also able
to hold bim up to derision by their intellect and wit.
He was anxious therefore to persuade them that his views
were on the whole the same as theirs with some few
differences.

We have given sufficient reasons for Muhammad's
treating the Jews with consideration, and we shall now
give proofs that he actually made great efforts to win them
over to his way of thinking. Besides the frequent religious
controversies already alluded to, there are many passages
in the Quran specially addressed to the Jews, in all of
which they are admonished in a very friendly way that the
Quran would serve as an arbitrator in their own disputes.
Not only did he address them with gentleness and
consideration, he actually did many things on purpose to
please them. At first simply and solely on account of the
Jews the Qibla, or place towards which prayer was to be
made, was changed by Muhammad to Jerusalem, from
Mecca the spot which the ancient Arabs had always
regarded as holy ; and it was only when he recognised the
fruitlessness of attempting to conciliate the Israelites that
he changed back to the former direction.

The first change is not, it is true, stated in so many words
in the Quran, only a complaint about the second alteration
is given, but some commentators maintain that the allusion
is to the former change.^ In disputes between Muslims
and Jews he shewed himself at times perhaps too lenient.
This is said to have given occasion to some believers to

& _ C J fl - .-

• Qiir^n TI. 136. Vgllc \^\S ^\ ,»a^ (^c ^j C
JaUlu'd-dia (Maraooi in looo) has as follows :

" After his Flight he ordered his followers to turn to the Temple at
Jerasalem (tiJlpIpn JT'Sl) > this however, which was done to conciliate
the Jews, held good for six or seven months only, and then he changed it
again."

MILDNESS OF CONTROVEESY. 15

refuse to submit to his judgmentj of which he complains in
Surah IV. 63. In another passage 1 he guards himself
against the accusation of giving wrong judgment by saying
that he judges only according to the right ; and again in
another passage 2 he asksj if they are afraid that God and
His apostle will do them wrong, though the commentators
relate another event as the occasion for this utterance.
He advises his Muslims also to go gently in disputes with
the Jews/'' as e.g. in the f ollo'wing passage : " Dispute not
against those who have received the Scriptures, unless in
the mildest manner ; except against such of them as
behave injuriously towards you : and say, ' We believe in the
revelation which hath been sent down unto us, and unto
you ; our God and your God is one, and unto Him are we
resigned' "A A strong proof that Muhammad held the Jews

» Surah IV. 106. U--i (^^ y.'? Sj

" Dispute not for those who deceive one another."
' Surah XXIY. 49. iJ^JJ ^U^ iii\ <-a^. u^ yptsJ f,\

" Or do they fear lest God and His Apostle act unjustly towards them ?"
3 Surah XXIX. 45, j^l ^_^ ^W Sj y^ ^\ ^y J>^ S j

G$u "Jax jyi; ^\ a;? ^^^^ ^-\ \/y; ^^^ ^^ ^.^h

a a ' B-— - — -O

"* »

' In the opinion of Arabic commentators this passage is more a proof
of fear of the Jews than a recommendation to mild dealing. Elpherar in
a long chain of traditions beginning with ^^^^^ Jy=^'\<^\ .i-c and ending
with 'j>y* )i\ s^ys :

* Jy^ Uj &UU

" The possessors of the Scriptures (the Jews) read the Law in Hebrew
and explained it to the Muslims in Arabic; so Muhammad said: 'Neither
agree with the possessors of the Scriptures, nor call them liars, and say
we believe, etc' " Further, there is another similar narrative first related
by AbdSa'id, ^/sUiSl A^\ (j) iii\ J^c Ju*^ ^\ but which can be traced
back to Abu Namlatu'l-Ans4ri jjjU2\ iUi ^\ , which reads as follows :

IG JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

in great respect lies in the fact that in passages enumerating
the different creeds l, he mentions the Jews immediately
after the Maslims.

In two of these passages he even promises Godfearing
Jews absolute equality with Muslims; and though in the
third and last he is not so lenient^ and threatens that a
distinction between them will be made, yet even in this
passage it is very plain that precedence over other religious
bodies is given to the Jews. In Muslim traditions it is
said that the sinful among the Muslims will go into the first,
the mildest of the seven hells,2 the Jews into the second.
Christians 3 into the third, and so on.4

In addition to all this, which produced in Muhammad the
wish to adopt much from Judaism into his religious system,
we must consider the fantastic development which the

•^ ^ >^^9^^ oy* A^\ fioW- aaLs &li\ Jy*) '^■^^ u**^ ' i^ ^^^-^ ^^

1^ Vas. (j\S fj\t *Ji«5Jua aJ !ikL.U y\i (jVi ()jL.jj ii^ } iJiiJXtj aJJU

"While he was sitting by Muhammad, a Jew who had just passed by
a corpse came up and said : ' 0 Muhammad, does this corpse speat ? ' He
said : ' Neither agree with the possessors of the Scriptures, nor call them
liars, but say : We believe in God, His angels, His word and His Apostles.
It what the Jews say is vain, do not confirm them ; if it is true, do not
give them the lie,' " i.e. preserve a strictly negative attitude, so as on
no account to expose yourselves j thus the meaning here seems to be
almost identical with that of the word \^yS 3 referred to above.

I Surahs II. 59, V. 73, XXII. 17.
\yX>»'\ ^^\ii\ the Muslims.

\.^\£> i^ii^\ the Jews.
^ See Division I. Section II. Chap. i. Part II A,

' D'Herbelot in his Bibliotheque orientale (under " Jahond " page 441,)
asserts on the contrary that the Muslims give the Jews a lower place in
hell than the Christians, but this is probably the opinion of a later age.

■• Pococke notaj miscellanse, Cap. 7 p. 289.

INTEECOUESE WITH JEWS. 17

Jewish traditions and history had reached in the mouth
of the people, as certain to appeal powerfully to the poetic
genius of the prophet ; and so we cannot doubt that, in so
far as he had the means to borrow from Judaism, and so
long as the Jewish views were not in direct opposition to
his own, Muhammad was anxious to incorporate much
borrowed from Judaism into his Quran. Whether he had
any such means will be discussed in the second section.

Second Section.

Could Muhammad borrow from Judaism ? and if so, how was
such borrowing possible for him ?

The possibility of borrowing from Judaism lay for
Muhammad, partly in the knowledge which might be
imparted to him by word of mouth through intercourse
with the Jews, and partly in personal knowledge of
their Scriptures ; while allowing him the first source of
information, we must deny him the second.

Prom passages already quoted — to which we might add
many others — we gather that there must have been great
intimacy between Muhammad and the Jews, leading at
times even to mutual discussion of views ; but this is still
more clearly shown in a passage in the second Sura,l
where the Jews are represented as double faced, professing
belief when they were with him and his followers, and then
when they were alone saying : " Will ye acquaint them
with what God has revealed unto you, that they may
dispute with you ? " This shows that the Muslims learned
the Jewish views from conversation only. We shall speak
later of Muhammad's intimacy with ' Abdu'llih ibn Salam,
and with Waraka, the cousin of Khadija, who was for some
time a Jew, a learned man and acquainted with the Hebrew

C J C — XP ■« C j_ J »*, _ j»

' Si'ira II. 71. ii ^^li.13 ,*^Ji£ iU] j-a Uj ^'jjA«i\

18 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

language and scriptures ; 1 so also was Habib ben Malik, a
powerful Arabian prince,^ who for some time professed tlie
Jewisli religion. These all afterwards became followers of
the Prophet. Thus Muhammad had ample opportunity
of becoming acquainted with Judaism. That his knowledge
thereof was not obtained from the Scriptures is clear,
from the matter actually adopted, since there are mistakes,
which cannot be regarded as intentional alterations,
and which would certainly have been avoided by anyone
who had the very slightest acquaintance with the sources.^
It is evident also from the low level of culture to which
Muhammad himself and the Jews of his time and country
had attained. The contempt in which the compilers of the
Talmud held the Arabian Jews, in spite of their political
power, can be attributed only to the ignorance of the latter.
Though we must not conclude from this that the Jews
knew nothing of the Scriptures and, though we hear of
schools among them 4 and even of their reading the sacred
writings in the original,^ still we must doubt, if there was
any widely diffused critical knowledge of the Scriptures, and
we may be quite certain that Muhammad himself possessed
none. Many passages testify to this. First, we may take
a passage already quoted,^ where he says he had formerly no
knowledge of reading and writing, and then Sura XLII.
52,7 where he denies any previous acquaintance with " the
Book" or the " Faith." Even if these are mere figures of
speech to prove the divine character of his mission, still it

' Vid. Blbeoar in Maraoo. Prodomi I. p, 44 j and Wahl, EinleituDg zur
Uebersetzung des Koran XXX.

2 WaU, Binleitung XXXV.

•" This will be explained in detail later.

* Comp. the passage quoted above from Baidhdwi in the 1st Section.

' Comp. the passage quoted above from Elpherar in the First Section
(foot note).

6 Sura XXIX. 47.

' " Thou didst not understand before this what the book of the
Qurdn was, nor what the faith was, etc." — (Sale),

THE JEWISH PEOPHETS. 19

is evident from them that he never enjoyed any reputation
for learning, such as would necessarily have been accorded
to him, had he really known anything of the Jewish
writings, and possessing which knowledge he would have
lived in fear of being proved to be an impostor.

The order in which he gives the prophets is interesting,
for immediately after the patriarchs he places first Jesus,
then Job, Jonah, Aaron, Solomon, and last of all David. l
In another passage^ the order is still more ridiculous, for
here we have David, Solomon, Job, Joseph, Moses, Aaron,
Zacharias, John, Jesus, Elijah, Ismael, Elisha, Jonah, and
Lot ! The incorrect spelling of the names of these prophets,
as well as the parts which he assigns to them in history,
proves that he had never even looked into the Hebrew
Scriptures. He actually asserts that before John the Baptist
no one had borne the name of John. Had he known
anything of Jewish history he would have been aware that,
apart from some historically unimportant people of the
name mentioned in Chronicles, the father and the son of the
celebrated Maccabean high priest, Mattathias, were both
called John. This mistake must have been obvious to the
Arabic commentators, for they try to give another meaning
to the clear and unmistakable words. Muhammad himself
was aware of his ignorance, and defends himself very neatly
against the possible charge. For instance in two passages 3
he asserts that God said to him : " We have not spoken to
thee about all the former prophets, only about some of
them, of others we said nothing to thee ;" thus cleverly
defending himself against the accusation of having over-
looked some of the prophets. We have quite enough
proofs in these passages, apart from those which will
come before us fully in the second part, that Muhammad
was singularly ignorant of the Jewish writings, and so we

Qmdn IV. IGl. ^ QnrSn VI. 84 ff.

5 SAra IV. 162 j XL. 78.

20 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

can afford to give up one thing whicli is generally
brought forward as specially proving our point. THs is
the fact that in certain passages Muhammad calls himself
an " ummiyun," 1 a word which is usually translated
" unlearned " " ignorant." Wahl takes it so, and mentions
it as a proof of Muhammad's ignorance. But this word has
here the same meaning that is expressed by it in other
passages, viz., belonging to the Arabs. It is used, like the
word " iahiliyat,"2 of the Arabs in their former ignorance
of IsMm, and Muhammad, having risen from among them,
thus designates himself ^ without reference to his own
individual knowledge.4 But, as already stated, even
without this proof our conclusion holds good, viz., that
because of his own ignorance especially, but also on
account of that of the Jews around him, Muhammad could

' Sdra XII. 156.

2 ^Cs- Sdra III. 148, III. 69.

" ^**/»3\ yio mina'l-ummlyfna or (j-^l ummiyun.

* The derivation of the word seems to me to support this view. Many
different derivations have been suggested, but all are unsatisfactory. Some

commentators, quoted by BIpherar, derive it from &/s\ nmmat, and give

a _ s

as examples of a similar formation (_j^ makiyun, and jJJm madaniyun

Oca- g-

from &SJ» makka and &j^s>t madina (see Ewald's Critical Grammar

of the Arabic language, I. §261. 2); but then they do not explain the
connection between the meanings of two words. This becomes clear,
however, when we consider the development in the meaning of the
similar Rabbinical word ''12 goi. This word, meaning in the Hebrew
" people," later on came to mean a " non-Jew; " because the Jews became
conscious that they themselves were a little community among the other
inhabitants of the laud, who were the " people " proper (compare the
expression V"lKn QV)- So at first the Muslims also must have looked
upon themselves as a small community in the midst of the populace,
the La, each man who was not counted among themselves, being
to them one of the M, or an ^^\, and so the word came to be used of
all those who did not believe ia revealed religion past and present.

RELATION OP ISlIm TO EARLIER RELIGIONS. 21

attain to no knowledge of tlie Hebrew Scriptures, though
on the other hand he had abundant opportunity to study
Judaism with its wealth of tradition and legend as it lived
in the mouth of the people.

In the first section we have shown that Muhammad had
good reasons for incorporating much taken from Judaism
in his Quran. By so doing he hoped to strengthen the
opinion that he was taught by direct revelation from God j
he had also a strong wish to win over the Jews to his
kingdom of the faithful upon earth, and then, too, the
legends and fanciful sayings of the Jews harmonised with
his poetic nature. In the second section we have shown
that he had abundant opportunities of acquainting himself
with Judaism j and now in the third section, before finally
determining that a borrowing from .Judaism really took
place, we have to consider and answer the question :
Would such a borrowing have been consistent with the
other views and opinions hold by Muhammad ?

Third Section.

Was it compatible with Muhammad's plan to horrow from
Judaism ?

Wo must consider this question from two sides.

First, it might have appeared to Muhammad as inadvisable
to borrow from the system of any other religious body lest
he should be accused of want of individuality ; and secondly,
there might have been something in the very fact of
adopting from Judaism which would militate against his
other plans. On closer examination, however, we find that
neither was the case. In general he was in favour of
borrowing from earlier religions. He desired no peculiarity,
no new religion which should oppose all that had gone
before ; he sought rather to establish one founded on the
ancient creeds purified from later changes and additions,
one which should adopt this or that new idea, and which

22 JUDAISM AND ISlIM.

sTiould above all things acknowledge him as a divinely
commissioned prophet. He let all that was already estab-
lished stand good, as is seen from the lists of the prophets
quoted above ; and he counts it as a point in favour of his
Qur^n that it isl in accord with the earlier writings
recognised by him as revelations. Another time he even
says that the Qur4n is similar to the earlier religious
writings, that it is only a repetition of them, i.e., if I am
not mistaken in forsaking the general interpretation and
translating the passage Sura XXXIX, 24 2 as follows :
" Grod hath sent down the most excellent tidings, 3 a
writing like unto others, a repetition." If this is not the
meaning, it is incomprehensible how Muhammad could try to
prove the superiority of his Qurdn by pointing to its continual
and almost wearisome repetitions. But if his assertion were
true, he might gain some advantage by being in accord
with earlier revealed writings, and by restoring to their
proper position those of them which had been spoiled by
additions and perversions, and those which had been too
little accounted of. He claims for himself only the same
honour which is paid to the other givers of revealed law ; 4
with this distinction however that he, as the last of the

Cj- , - pu.- ^

1 Sura XL VI. 11. ^gii Cj ^1^

^ On the word ^J\iJ» masini which is omitted by Elpherar see below

Second Division, Third Section, First Chapter, First Part,

* He seems to distinguish between lawgivers and prophets; for while
he gives the names of the latter in utter confusion, he mentions the
former in their right order, viz., Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesns (Suraa
XXXIII. 7. XLII. 11.) Arabic commentators recognise this difference ; thus
Elpherar on Sura XXXIII. 7: *9j3 (j-rt?!-J\ ^y y^ii^ & »*iJ\ S^i ^os.

He distinguishes these five viz., the four given above and Muhammad,
naming them alone of the prophets, because they were the compilers of
writings and laws revealed to them, and were men of strong character
among the apostles.

THE QUEAN A PINAL REVELATION. 28

prophets, is to be considered as the seal of the prophets/
and therefore as the most perfect among them, because his
book is so clear 2 that no disputes or misunderstandings
can arise about it, and, therefore, no apostle would be needed
after himself. Thus it is clear that a borrowing from other
religions was quite compatible with Muhammad's general
aim. Consideration for his Arab followers, i.e., the fear of
being called a mere compiler, a reproach which he did not
altogether escape, did not hinder him, from such borrowing,
partly, because he believed that he might rely on their
ignorance; partly, because he had only to prove the
harmony which must necessarily exist between the various
revelations of the same God. Muhammad maintained that
it was all revelation, that he derived nothing from Jew
or Christian, but that Grod Himself revealed to him the
contents of earlier Scriptures, and the historical facts
concerning them. "With regard to Judaism in particular
'Muhammad found no special difficulty. We have already
observed that much in it accorded with the Prophet's poetic
spirit, and who can now assert that any objection to an
agreement with Judaism would have been raised by
Muhammad's contemporaries ? In those days people had
not reached such a pitch of so-called enlightenment, as to
consider the followers of one creed only as in the right,
and to regard everything belonging to another belief as
worthless ; to restrict to Christians the elements common to
humanity, and to condemn Judaism as crafty and lifeless.
Thus it was possible for Muhammad to lay before the Jews
the points of union between his religion and their own,
carefully avoiding the while those points in his doctrine
which would be unacceptable to them.

It is clear in itself that he could not adopt the whole of

a.-ji ^-. -

» j3--rt^^ ^U. Sura XXXIII. 40.

9 ._

' l^y.^yfj« \mf>\^

24 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

Judaism into his systenij but parts only and even these he
was obliged to alter and rearrange. In bringing the Jews to
his opinion he had to be careful not to alienate others ; he
could not, therefore, adopt from them such points as stood
in complete contradiction to the views of other religious
bodies ; and so, while he totally excluded some things, he
was obliged to elaborate and alter other things with which
he could not dispense, in order that they might still more
strengthen his own position. Of this he either became
aware himself, or others reproached him with it, so that he
was forced to assert 1 that the Qur£n is not a new invented
fiction. He could not maintain with the Jews that their
Law was immutable, for that would have been fatal to his
system of religious syncretism; nor could he with them
expect a Messiah, because if there were another prophet
yet to come, he Muhammad could no longer claim to be
the seal of the prophets. This last point was carried so
far that the Arabs later on confounded the doctrine of a
Dajjalj or deceiver, which they had borrowed from the
Christians, with the doctrine of the expected Messiah of
the later Jews; and the saying existed :2 "The name of
Dajjal among the Jews is Messiah the son of David."
Much in confirmation of what has been stated above will
be brought forward in the Second Section of the Second
Division, and also in the Appendix.

While this investigation has for the most part consisted
in enquiring into what was, or might well have been, in
Muhammad's mind, it is by no means to be imagined that
we regard him as a deceiver who deceived intentionally,
and with a well-weighed consideration of each step as to
whether or no it would help him towards his aim of
deluding others. Wahl regards him in this light. On the

&J s _ _ _ _

' Sura XII. iii. j^j^i ^As. yU' \m

' j.\j 1^. c*~*" ■^ii^^ ''•^ JWjJ^ (»-^ Pocooke NotEe MiBoellanese,
appendix to Porta Moaia, cap. 7, page 260.

MUHAMMAD AN ENTHUSIAST. , 25

contrary, we mast guard ourselves carefully against such
an opinion, and look upon it as a sign of persistent
prejudice and total misunderstanding of the human heart.
Muhammad seems rather to have been a genuine enthusiast,
who was himself convinced of his divine mission, and to
whom the union of all religions appeared necessary to the
welfare of mankind. He so fully worked himself into this
idea in thought, in feeling and in action, that every event
seemed to him a divine inspiration. Every thing necessary
to the attainment of his aim stood out clearly before him,
just because this one idea ruled him. He could think of
nothing but what fitted in with it, could feel nothing but
what harmonised with it, could do nothing but what was
demanded by it. There is no question here of design, for
this one idea so possessed his spirit, heart and will as to
become the sole thought of his mind, so that every thing
which entered his mind was shaped by this idea. Of course,
in the most fanatical minds there are occasional lucid
intervals, and during these Muhammad certainly deceived
himself and others ; it is also undeniable that at times
ambition and love of power were the incentives to his
actions, but even so the harsh judgment generally passed
upon him is unjustifiable.

We may say, as a result of this investigation, that it
would be very remarkable if there were not much to be
found in the Quran which is clearly in harmony with
Judaism. It is evident that Muhammad sought to gain
the Jews to his side, and this could best be done by
approximating to their religious views ; it is also evident
that he had ample means of acquainting himself with these
views ; and lastly, that other considerations favoured rather
than hindered such a borrowing from Judaism. And now
the chief work remains to be done, and that is, to
demonstrate by careful reference to the Qurdn that
borrowing from Judaism has actually taken place.

26 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

SECOND DIVISION.

Did Muhammad borrow from Judaism ? If so, what did he
borrow ?

Before we pass to tlie consideration of individual pas-
sages as instances of borrowing from Judaism, we must
show some general historical grounds for the opinion that
a borrowing from that source has taken place ; and thus
this division falls again into two sections, a general and
a particular.

FiEST Section.

Did Muhammad borrow from Judaism ?

For the answer to this question we are thrown back
entirely on the Qurd.n, ^ as we have no other literature

' The following story, is related by Kazuin— (Poo. Spec. p. 309) :

j^\ — i \^^\a t)y*y^- ^•'^)* •^} ^^.-^^ (•'^ W dU\ J^j y\ ^2JJ

(^j (j-i" o^J *"^J <:>ff **• •3/ <J^^ ^^ V^ ^■^ t>^

jjj \jjiVc ^yoj y\i i»^i^ <j-'J*J (3^^ ^^ J^ <^*"

" It ia said that when the Apostle of God came to Madfna, he found the

Jews fasting on 'Ashtira. He asked them their reason for so doing, and

they answered : ' Beoanse on this day Pharaoh and his people were

drowned, bat Moses and his followers were saved ' ; on which Muhammad

said : ' I stand in closer connection with Moses than they do ', and then he

commanded the fast day 'Ashiira. The cause of the institution of the fast

day ' Ashura, which like "'Ti'?} the tenth day of the seventh month,

(Leviticus XXIII, 27) clearly means the day of atonement, is very

uncertain. Elpherar is not more exact, for he assigns an equally erroneous

cause. On Sura XI. 46 he says :

" And they went out (of the ark) on the day 'Ashdra, and Noah fasted
and commanded all with him to fast out of gratitude to God." In any
case, however, the important fact remains, that Muhammad adopted one
of the fast days of the Jews, which was afterwards abolished like the
Jewish Qibla. See also D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque Orientale, under the
word Aschonr, page 127.

ARAB COMPLAINT AGAINST MUHAMMAD. 27

of the same date whicli treats of the matter in question.
Still there are plenty of passages there preserved to us,
which in a general way sufficiently prove our point ; and
indeed they all contain either the blame expressed by
Muhammad's contemporaries at his borrowing from
Judaism, or else an appeal from him to the Jews, as
witnesses of the truth of his assertions. He complains
bitterly in many passages that the Arabs said his words
were not original,! and even called them antiquated lies.2
Sometimes they said still more definitely that a certain
man taught him, 3 and the addition of the words : ■*
" The tongue of the person unto whom they incline
is a foreign tongue, but this is the perspicuous Arabic
tongue," shows plainly that this man was a Jew.
Commentators take this view, and indeed think that it
was 'Abdu'Udh Ibn SaMm, a learned Eabbi, with whom
Muhammad was in constant and close intercourse, and who
is frequently mentioned in the commentaries.^ Another
rather more general statement is as follows : ^ "' Other
people have assisted him therein ; " on which Elpherar
remarks ^ : " Mujdhid says, by this he means the Jews."
Could any one desire a clearer historical witness than this
accusation, which was so often brought against Muhammad,

^K-^jC — b

1 j^jS\jiL.\ Comp. Suras VIII. 31, XVI. 26, XXIII. 85, XXV. 6,
XXVII. 70, XL VI. 16, LXVIII. 15, LXXXIII. }3.

' 1 ji Jii\ Sura XLVI^ 10.
' - a

3 liJ iiUj" Ui\ Sura XVI. 105.

"^ ' - " a

* 0f^^ ^jC yLJ \iJi>j (_j«<ssc\ &iJ\ (^AaJi ^Jii\ yLJ

* Abnlfeda aanales Moslemlfcioi I. 283.
6 Sura XXV. 5. (^^yi.'S fji ««lc ii\c\

28 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

and wliich appeared to him so important that he constantly
referred to it in the hope of refuting the charge ? He
himself confesses, however, that much related by him is to
be found in the earlier Scriptures. To the embarrassing
question, as to why he never worked a miracle, he constantly
answered that he who was called to be a preacher only,
not a wonder-worker, had yet told them plainly of the
miracles which are mentioned in the earlier writings, l
and which the learned .Jews knew well.2 They could
testify to the truth of these narratives,^ and among them
one man 4 especially, the aforesaid 'Abdu'llah Ibn Salam,5
to whom the laudatory passage in Sura III. 68 is said to
refer. Not only were they to corroborate his words to
others, but also to remove any doubt from Muhammad's
own mind as to the truth of his Mission. Thus we have
in one place the injunction given to him : ^ "If thou art in
doubt concerning that which we have sent down unto thee,

1 Suras XX. 133. JjS\ ^b<&<J\ ^ XXTI. 196. t>*^jS\ jij ^J

2 Sura XXVI. 197. Jf\p\ ^ StSi^ i^M

- » -

On whicli Elpherar : . ^'^^ ^^ &1J\ X^ ^L*.*^ \j\^ d>Jac /^s\ JU

3 Sdra XYII. 103. 3^j^\ ^. jC U

" a -

* Sura XLYI. 9. ^^\^^ ^J>i y-« a&ls. JigAi
- g - - '

' Elpherar in the name of several commentators, says :

^»iiL> Ji*ja-» j_5i!M*!^ l<f^ ^Jji J^4i (.i_ (^ ()il3\ juc |.!L..»ys

" This is , who testified to the prophetic mission of

Mn^amraad, the chosen one, and believed in him ; bnt the Jews were
arrogant and woujd not believe in him."

^ Sura X. 94. v»V;^M yjySj. ^^.^\ JU.U udJ\ ij}y\ U/. csU ^ ci^jlT ^\i
' ' a - i.- = -■ a

WHAT WAS BOEEOWED PEOM JUDAISM. 29

ask them who have read the book before thee."^ If he
then, howerer cunningly, acknowledges the Jews as to a
certain extent witnesses to his revelations, we are justified
in expressing our opinion that Judaism was one source of
the utterances in the Qur4n, and in this certainty we may
proceed at once to discuss the actually borrowed passages.

Second Section.

What did Muhammad borrow from Judaism ?

In the case of any single instance of borrowing, the
proof that the passage is really of Jewish origin must rest
on two grounds. First, it must be shown to exist in .Judaism,
and to prove this we have every facility. Secondly, in
order to attain to certainty we must prove that it is
really borrowed, i.e., that it is not founded on anything
in old Arabian tradition, which Muhammad used largely
as a foundation though he disputed some points. Then
again we must shew that it had its origin in Judaism
and not in Christianity. For the complete discussion of
the last two points it would be necessary to write two
treatises similar to the one on which I am now engaged,
of which the respective subjects would be — (1) the points
of contact between IsMm and the ancient tradition of the
Arabs, and (2) the points of contact between Isldm and
Christianity ; and only in this way could certainty on these
points be attained. But these investigations would, on the
one hand, lead us too far away from our particular subject.

' On this Elpherar Bays : J^^ tJ^/SJ^ (_ji«J O

" By that which we have sent down to thee, the Qnrin is meant ; those
who have read before thee may instruct thee, that then art foretold in
the Law which they have ; " and again : v_jU;5il\ Ja\ y,^ ^m\ y,« ^^
iAa-A J (•!»-> (^ <Sl3\ Jtf«i^ " He means the believers among the possessors
of the Scriptures, e.g., 'Abdu'llih ben SalAm and hia fellows."

30 JUDAISM AND ISLIm.

andj on the other, they would require a much more exact
treatment than could be given while handling our main
subject. Then, too, they are made unnecessary by the
means which we use in each individual case, and which
will be shown in the different divisions of the work ; so
that on most points we can without them attain to a high
degree of probability, practically sufficient for all scientific
purposes. For the sake of clearness, it may be well to
divide the material borrowed from Judaism into thoughts
belonging to it, and narratives taken from it, and later we
shall have to subdivide again.

Second Section.
Chapter I.
Thoughts helonging to Judaism which have passed over into
the Quran ?

The new thoughts borrowed by one religion from another
are of a twofold nature. Either they are radically new,
there being hitherto in the borrowing religion not even
a foreshadowing of them, so that the very conceptions
are new, and require accordingly new words for their
expression ; or else the component parts of these thoughts
have long been in existence but not in this combination, the
form in which these conceptions are blended being a novel
one, and the view, therefore, which arises from this unusual
presentation being new. We must therefore divide this
chapter according to these distinctions.

First Chaptee.
First Part.
Conceptions harrowed from Judaism ?
As the ushering in of hitherto unknown religious con-
ceptions is always marked by the introduction of new
words for their expression, and as the Jews in Arabia,

HEBEEW WORDS IN THE QUEAN. 31

even when able to speak Arabic, kept to the Eabbinical
Hebrew names for their religious conceptions ; so words
which from their derivation are shown to be not Arabic but
Hebrew, or better still Eabbinic, must be held to prove the
Jewish origin of the conceptions expressed. The passage
already quoted about the foreign language spoken by those
who were accused of helping Muhammad in writing the
Quran seems to point to the use among the Jews of a
language other than Arabic. The object of this chapter
is to enumerate the words which have passed from
Eabbinical Hebrew into the Quran, and so into the Arabic
language.

Tdbut, 1 Ark. The termination nt is a fairly certain
evidence that the word is not of Arabic but of Eabbinical
Hebrew origin ; 2 for this dialect of Hebrew has adopted in
the place of other endings this termination, which is very
common also in Chaldaic and Syriac ; and I venture to
assert that no pure Arabic word ends in this way.3 Our
word appears in two different passages with two different
meanings : first, where the mother of Moses is told to put
her son into an ark,4 the signification being here purely
Hebrew ; but from this it arose that the ark of the
covenant 5 was also called by this name. It is used thus
especially ^ in the sense of coming before the ark in prayer.
In the second Sura^ we find it mentioned as a sign of the

1 cyjiis -rrn^Pi

' Rabbinical Hebrew •Mj'n^3''jri

* Comp. uLsJ^Us and cujSX*

♦ Sura XX. 39. Comp. «aa n^n Ex. II. 3.
5 ]inM in the Bible.

' •n3"'rirr lasb nns Comp. Mislma Beraohoth V. 4.

' The Arabians sometimea use fc.j.C.3\ «"»(.> also in the meaning of
"ark of the covenant" (D'Herbelot Bibliotheqae Orientate ander
" Aschmonil.")

32 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

rightful ruler that through him the ark of the covenant l
should return. 2

Taurdt, the Law. 3 This word like the Greek equivalent
in the New Testament is used only for the Jewish
revelation ; and although Muhammad, having only oral
tradition, was not able to distinguish so exactly, yet it is
obvious that he comprehended the Pentateuch alone under
this name ; 4 for among the Jewish prophets after the
patriarchs he counts Moses alone as a lawgiver. For
the most part the Law is mentioned in connection with the
G-ospel.5

Janndtu 'Adn, Paradise. 6 The word "'Adn" is not

1 Sura II. 249.

' The masculine gender here given to this word, as indicated by the
fact that &*s refers to it, would appear strange, were it not that perhaps

the old word ^inS was in mind; and the termination >^J being foreign
to Arabic is in that language no sure indication of gender.

3 |\j^ nnin o i/6/ao?.

* Later Arabians maintained just the opposite. Ahmad ben 'Abdu'l-
Halim (Maraco. Prod. I. p. 5.) says :

\ *s\_,y ^j*_5 Vflir^

" If one says : Instrnot me about the allusions to the Apostle of God in
the Tor4h, one understands by that expression all revealed scriptures,
since they are all called Tordh; and further:

v>ViS3\ Ja\ \b\jk ^_^\ y-j.!,. j\ji wuS3^ i>,\ Jys aS ^^^\ tiS ^

" It is acknowledged that by the word Torah are meant revealed
writings, particularly those which the possessors of the scriptures (Jews
and Christians) alike read ; therefore it includes the Psalms, the prophecy
of Isaiah and other prophecies, but not the Gospel."

However this does not alter the conviction which we have already

* J-<sJS( Oomp. Siiras III. 2, 43, 58, 86, V. 70, VII. 157, IX. 112,

LXI. 6, LXII. 5.

6 yl^^w r7.y 13

GARDEN OP EDEN. , 33

known in the Arabic language in the sense of pleasure or
happiness, but this is the meaning which suits the word in
this connection.! In Hebrew this is the radical meaning ;
still this expression, viz.. Garden of Eden, which occurs
often in the Bible, is never to be explained out and out as
Paradise ; but rather Eden 2 is there the proper name of
a region which was inhabited by our first parents in their
innocence, and the part in which they actually lived was a
garden of trees. It is only natural that this earthly region
of the golden age should by degrees have come to be
regarded as Paradise, in that the word itself ^ no longer
stands for the name of a place but is applied to a state of
bliss ; 4 though the Jews still held to Eden as a locality
also. It is clear from the translation " gardens of
pleasure " that the Jews of that time not merely transferred
the name Eden into Arabic, but carried over its supposed
etymology as well. The more distinctively Christian name 5
occurs seldom in the Quran, though it also is not quite

' The Arabic commentators give widely difEerent meaniugs to the word,
but they know nothing of that given by ns just because it is foreign to the

2- - "
Arabic language. Blpherar seems to decide for the view that i\^\j\

as well as (0<^, means permanence, as the pious will remain there

for ever.

* Mnljammad uses it thus in Suras IX. 73, XIII. 23, XVI. 33,
XVIII. 30, XIX. 62, XX. 78, XXXT. 30, XXXVIII. 50, XL. 8, LXI. 12, and

in other places he translates it (»4?td\ «aU^ c. g. V. 70, X. 9, XXII. 65.

XXXI. 7, XXXVII. 42, LXVIII. 34. Sometimes also he uses it in the

singnlar ■».^».iS\ <U». XXVI. 85 ; and even without the article, A-«i iit^

liVI. 88, LXX. 38.

G^CC^

5 ,^^S^\ uuW 6 TrapaSeiao'!.

34 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

strange to later Judaism^ as is shown by the story of the
four who went alive to Paradise. 1

Jahannam, Hell. 2 This word also, like its opposite
Paradise, is of Jewish origin. According to its primary
meaning and Biblical usage it too is the name of a place,
though of a locality far less important than that which
gave its name to Paradise. The vale of Hinnom was
nothing more than a spot dedicated to idol worship ; and
it is remarkable that the horror of idolatry led to the use
of its name to designate hell. That this is the ordinary
name for it in the Talmud needs no proof, and from it is
derived the New Testament name Gehenna. Now, it might
be asserted that Muhammad got this word from the
Christians ; but, even setting aside the argument that, as
the name for Paradise is Jewish the probabilities are in
favour of a Jewish origin for the word for hell also, the
form of the word itself speaks for its derivation from
Judaism. We lay no stress on the fact that the aspirate
he, which is not expressed in the Greek, reappears in the
Arabic, because this aspirate though not always indicated
by grammarians in writing, appears to have been always
sounded in speech. This holds good of other Greek words
which have passed into Syriac. 3 The letter mim which
stands at the end of the Arabic (Jahannam), not being
found in the Syriac word, proves the derivation from the

1 D7."19 Paradise, Chagiga fol, 14. Compare Sdra, XVIII. 107.
XXIII. 11.

Among many wrong explanations Elpherar gives the following
correct one : ^^^ J^BJ* ^ E^)^^ J^ ) *4«j;5W fc)b'".;M jfe Jtal^,-* Jli

" Mni&hid says it means a, garden in Greek, and Zaj4j says it has passed
into Arabic."

3 E.g. (TVvoBo<;, i.e., Snnhadua and especially yeevva, which is
pronounced in Syriac, as Gfhano.

AHBAE AND hIbHEE. 35

Hebrew wordj (Gehinnom) . The word is found in many
places in the Quran. 1

Ahhdr^. This word is found in several places in the
Qurdn in the sense of teacher. Now the real Hebrew
word 3 " hibher, " companion, has acquired in the Mishna
a meaning similar to that of " p£rush ; " 4 only that the
latter was the name of a sect, and the former the name of
a party within a sect. The word p^rush means, properly
speaking, one separated, i.e., one who withdraws himself
out of motives of piety, a Pharisee, as distinguished from
one who grasps without scruple all the pleasures of this
life, a Sadducee. Among those who were thus separated
there grew up a difference from others not only in social
customs, but especially in that they adopted a different
doctrinal view, viz., a belief in oral tradition. They had
also some very strict principles for the guidance of their
lives. But the matter was no longer merely one of great
carefulness in life and conduct, it became one of special
learning and knowledge, which naturally could not be
imparted in equal measure to all members of this sect.
Hence these learned men, each of whom possessed some
special knowledge, became greatly reverenced ; and in this
way again a community was formed in centra-distinction
to which the remaining people of the country were called
the laity. ^ The individual members of this community
however were called habherim,^ " fellows;" and thus, though
the meaning 'teacher' is not, properly speaking, in the

> S^ras II. 201, III. 10, 196, IV. 58, 95, 99, 115, 120, etc.

s ju^\ Qnan v. 48, 68, ix. si, 34.

^ VlSfl D^' 'KaiKo<: from Xao<;.

36 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

word itself, yet the peculiar development of this com-
munity is the cause of tlie new meaning of the word.

The excessive veneration paid to these " fellows " by
the Jews gives rise to Muhammad's reproof in the two
passages last alluded to. He reproaches the Christians
too in both places ^ on account of the esteem in which
they held the ruhbdn. This word ruhbdn is probably not
derived from rahiba,2 to fear (thus god-fearing) ; but, like
qissisun 3 the word which accompanies it in Sura V. 85, is
to be derived from the Syriac, which language maintained
its preeminence among the Christians in those regions ;
thus ruhbdn is derived from the Syriac word rabhoye, and
qissisun from the 'Syriac q^shlshoye.

So then ruhbin does not really mean the ordinary
monks, who are called daire, but the clergy; whereas
qissis stands for the presbyter, the elder, who is called
qdshisho in Syriac.

JDarasa 4 =to reach the deep meaning of the Scripture
by exact and careful research. Such a diligent enquiry
is mentioned in several passages. 5 But this kind of
interpretation, which is not content to accept the obvious
and generally accepted meaning of a passage, but which
seeks out remote allusions— this (though it may bring much
of importance and value to light, if used with tact and
knowledge of the limits of the profitable in such study)

• Sura IX. 31. 34, yWJ»j ruhban.

(J}""-'"*

* Suras III. 73, XXXIV. 43, LXVIII. 37, VII. 168. On the last passage
Elpherar says : ^^y^^ J*> ^y *;«»'*» ) ^\;* vV^\ yjJ,}

The y-jO of a writing means, to read it and arrange it over and

over again.

DAEASA. 37

is very apt to degenerate and to become a mere laying
of stress on the unimportant, a searching for meanings
where there are none, and for allusions which are purely
accidental. And so the word acquired a secondary mean-
ing, viz., to trifle, to invent a meaning and force it into
a passage. Compare the standing expression 1 current
among many who seek 2 the simple primary meaning.
The word in this usage occurs in the Quran, particularly
in the mouth of Muhammad's opponents ; though until now
this fact has not been recognised. The obviously misunder-
stood passage in Sura VI. 105 3 is thus explained, also that
in VI. 157.4 The former may be thus translated : "And
when we variously explain our signs, they may say if they
like : Thy explanations are far fetched, we will expound it
to people of understanding " ; and the latter as follows :
" Lest ye should say : the Scriptures were only sent down
unto two peoples before us, but we turn away from their
system of forced explanation " ; i.e., they have left the
Scriptures to us so overlaid and distorted that we cannot
follow them. It is remarkable that this word, which is not
a usual one in the Qur£n, appears in this sense only in the
sixth Sura where it occurs twice ; and this is evidence that
just at the time of the composition of this Sura the word
in its secondary meaning was used by some persons as
a reproach to Muhammad. This observation furthermore
might well serve to indicate the unity of this Sura.

Babbdni^ teacher. This Eabbinical word is probably

38 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

formed by the addition of the suffix an 1 (like nn) to the
word " rab, " thus, our lord or teacher, Tor though the
termination " an " is. common in later Hebrew,^ yet the
weaker word " rabbi " shows that people did not hesitate
to append a suffix fco the word rab, and then to treat the
whole as a new word. However that may be, rabban is a
word of itself now, and is only conferred as a title on the
most distinguished teachers. The Eabbinical rule runs
thus 3 " (rreater than rabbi is rabbin. " It appears as a
title of honour in Suras III. 73, V. 48, 68. Eabb^ni is
evidently a word of narrower meaning than the word
ahbir explained above ; and this explains why rabbdni is
put before ahhir in the two passages last mentioned,
where they both appear, and also the striking omission of
cur word in the other two places where ahb£r occurs, and
where Muhammad finds fault with the divine reverence
paid to teachers, describing them with the more general
word. The case is the same with qissls and ruhb£n. Both
classes are mentioned with praise in Sura V. 85, and with
blame in Sura IX. 31, 34, the latter class however only in
connection with, ahb£r, in that ruhb£n (like ahbir) is
of wider meaning : and further, on account of the combina-
tion in one passage of two different classes among the
Jews and Christians, viz., the ahb^r and the ruhb£n,
{Cf. other similar combinations) no special differentiation
was to be attempted.

Salt 4 day of rest, Saturday. This name continued to
be applied to Saturday throughout the Bast by Christians
as well as Muslims, though it had ceased to be a day of

1 Snffix ]— like ^^

' Suffix ] — Syriao. ono, Arabic t)^

3 1'sn •'ana biia

nit»

SABT, AND SAKINAT. 39

rest. 1 In one place 2 Muhammad seems rather to protest
against its being kept holy. The well-known Ben Ezra
remarks on this in his commentary on Exodus xvi. 1,^ where
he says : " In Arabic five days are named according to
number^ first day, second day, etc. But the sixth flay is
called the day of assembly/ for it is the holy day of the
week ; the Sabbath however is called by the Arabs saht,
because the Shin 5 and the Samech, {i.e., the Arabic sin
which is pronounced like the Hebrew Samech) interchange
in their writings. They have taken the word from Israel."
Sahinat ^ the Presence of God. In the development
of Judaism in order to guard against forming too human
an idea of the Godhead, it was customary to attribute
the speaking of God, when it is mentioned in the Scripture,
to a personified word of God,7 'as it were embodying that
emanation from the Deity which came in Christianity to a
veritable Incarnation. In like manner also when in the
Scriptures the remaining stationary, or the resting of God is
mentioned, something sensible proceeding from Him is to
be thought of. This is especially so in the case of God's
dwelling in the Temple ; ^ and this ' emanation of the

' S<irasII. 61,VII. 163.
' Sura XVI. 125.

3 Di'^i -lapan T]-)-!, bv niaj ni^an -iN-ii? •'any. p'tjJba
v^'D.ws. I3?3n nvn nnb «!in >^ an^an nw bv raiabs •»t^tj;
nna^in^a n''D'?ni-ia T^pJsm, pt^n >2 nao inis sn-]|T ri2t» oi-'i

^ipb bM-;c?7;a nbsi

* W Shin.

' Jl? VQ'a'^P \6yo^ rov 6eov.

" D3in2 in:?25i Kx. xxv. s, cf. ceut. xxxni. 12, 16.

40 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

Godhead ' to adopt the speech of the Gnostics, was Called
on this account the Shekinah, the resting. From this
derivation Shekinah came to be the word for that side of
Divine Providence which, as it were, dwells among men
and exerts an unseen influence among them. In the
original meaning, viz. that of the Presence in the Temple
over the Ark of the Covenant between the Cherubim,! the
word is found in Sura II. 249. In the sense of active
interposition and visible effectual rendering of aid it occurs
in Sura IX. 26, 40 ; 2 in the sense of supplying peace of
mind and at the same time giving spiritual aid it is found
in Sura XL VIII. 4, 18, 26.3 It is remarkable that the
word appears in three Suras only, (but several times in
the two last mentioned,) and with a somewhat different
meaning in each ; and it seems here again, as we remarked
above on the word darasa, as though outside influence had
been at work, i.e., that the use of this word by other people
seems to have influenced Muhammad at the time of the
composition of these Suras.

Tagh'it * error. Though this mild word for idolatry is

' Ex. XXV. 22.

^ Arabic commentators do not seem willing to recognise this mean-
ing. Elpherar on Sura IX. 26 says the word means ii*jUi=5\ ^ (^S\,
security and rest j and on Sura XL VIII. 4 he says distinctly j

" Ben 'Abb4s says this word SaVinat in the Qnr&n always means rest
except in the second Sura." But even if &ijUi> does mean inward peace
of mind, still the meaning of outward security need not be excluded.

' Elpherar uses the expression jVi^^ j ii<iUy\ to explain verse 4, and
ViJ\ , 5i»jUlj5\ to explain verse 18. In the same way D'Herbelot (Biblio-
theque Orientale under Thalout, page 862) gives in the name of the
commentators the explanation jt\a!5\ t>«i~-* ie., tranquillity of the
mind.

4 i^u=, nwK)

FURQAN.

not found in the Uabbinical Writings,! gtiH the Jews in
Arabia seem to have used it to denote the worship of false
gods, for it appears in the Quran 2 in this sense. ^

Furqdn,'^ deliverance,-'' redemption. This is a very
important word, and it is one which in my opinion has till
now been quite misunderstood. In the primary meaning
it occurs in the 8th Sura : " 0 true believers ! if ye fear
Grod, He will grant you a deliverance ^ and will expiate
your sins, etc." Elpherar gives five different explanations
to this verse, each as unsuitable as Wahl's translation, and
the passage seems to me truly classical for the primary
meaning of the word. This meaning appears also in Sura
VIII. 42, where the day of the Victory of Badr is called
the day of deliverance, ^ and in Sura II. 181 where this
name is given to the month Ramadhan as the month of
redemption and deliverance from sin. Muhammad entirely
diverging from Jewish ideas, intended to establish his
religion as that of the world in general ; further he
condemned the earlier times altogether calling them
times of ignorance. ^ He declared his creed to have been
revealed through Grod's Apostles from the earliest times,
and to have been only renewed and put into a clearer and

• It is to be observed however that the Targnms frequently use this
word in the plural N"^'!!?^ ^""^ ^^^ ''J''!^ themselves, but not for idolatry.

» Suras II. 257, 259, IV. 63, XVI. 38, XXXlX. 19.
3 ^W.U\ as Elpherar explains it.

* Ibn Said according to Elpherar explains this word as follows :

" Furqan is help against the enemy." Sura XXI. 49.
« Sdra VIII. 29. G\iy ^si' ji^

42 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

more convincing form by himself. Hence the condition
of any one outside his belief must have seemed to him
a sinful one, and the divine revelation granted to himself
and his predecessors appeared to him in the light of
deliverance from that sinful life which could only lead to
punishment; and therefore he calls revelation itself in
many places Furqd.n, as in many he calls it rahmat, l mercy.
In some passages he applies the term to the Quran, 2 and
in others to the Mosaic revelation. 3

In this way all the passages fit in under the primary
signification of the word, and there is no need to guess at a
different meaning for each.

Md'un, 4 refuge. This word bears a very foreign impress,
and is explained by the Arabic Commentators in a variety
of ways. Grolius following them, forces the most diverse
meanings into it. It appears in Sura CVII. 7, and seems
to me to mean a refuge — ",they refuse refuge," i.e., they
give no shelter to those asking for help. Later on the word
seems to have been regarded as derived from 'ana 5
(certainly not from ma'ana to which Golius refers it),
and thence it acquired the meaning of support, alms.

Masdni, 6 repetition. There has been much perplexity
about this word, mainly because it has been considered as
an Arabic word and has not been traced back to its source.
As by degrees other teaching viz., tradition, 7 grew up by
the side of that contained in Holy Writ, the whole law

' Suras III. 2, XXV. title and verse 1.
' Sdras II. 50, XXI. 49.

ffCj.-

' From y\i not from j^jw
* Compare under A-^]

"iTxaiNi. . 43

was divided into two parts, 1 the written teaching, that is
the Bible, and the teaching by word of mouth or tradition.
To occupy oneself with the former was called " to read ;" 2
to occupy oneself with the latter was called " to say." 3
In the Chaldaic Gremara the latter word means to speak
after, to repeat the teacher's words after him. In like
manner the word tinnah* was used almost exclusively of
choral music, in which the choir repeated verses after the
precentor. Thus teaching by word of mouth was called
mishnah, 5 and so also the collection of oral teaching — the
whole tradition ; and afterwards when this was all written
down the book received the same name. Now, however, an
etymological error crept in and derived this word from
shanah in its true Hebrew meaning " to repeat," and then
applied it to the repetition of the written teaching. ^ The
error of this explanation is shown both in the use of the
word and in its inflection.^ Still it seems to have been
accepted by the Eoman Jews, and thus it came about that
in Justinian's Novels the Mishna is called secunda editio. ^
The same thing happened in the case of the Arabian Jews,
and so we get our word masani. Muhammad putting his
book in the place of the whole Jewish teaching calls it not
only Qurin (miqri) but also mascLni. 9

1 2n32t» n-iin and ns b^atr min

T : * V T V - : :• IT

t't

' n3tD connected with the poetic TMH and the Syriac tano,

* nan

T ■

T : •

« min natra

T •■ : ■

' nWTZ in construct, not n^Wn

' SevTepcoati;.

' Suraa XV. 87, XXXIX. 24.

The Arabian commentators on Siira XV. 87 differ much in their
explaaation of this word, but one among them gives what seems to an

4t JUDATSM AND ISLAM.

MalakUt, 1 government. This word is nsed only of God's
rule, in whicb connexion it invariably appears also in
Eabbinioal writings. 2 It occurs in several passages in the
Quran. 3 From this narrow use of the word, and from a
false derivation from mald,k or roalak^ (a word which
comes from quite a different root, and which in Arabic has
only the meaning of a messenger of God) it came to be
used for the realm of spirits. ^

These fourteen words, which are clearly derived from the
later, or Rabbinical Hebrew, shew what very important
religious conceptions passed from Judaism into Isldm, —
namely, the idea of the Divine guidance, sakinat, malakut ;^

the true meaning. Elpherar has ; j_s»^ i^ d^}^^ (^j^\ JVi^ " Tavus
says the whole Quran is called Maekni." At the same time also a
reference is made to the other passage cited by us, viz., Sura XXXIX. 24.
The word Vatj..« in Sura XV. 87, seems to me to mean either that this
Sura was really the seventh (the order of the Suras was afterwards much
changed, and we may safely assert that Sura II is of later date than those

following it), or else **«• bears the meaning jj_ and g*t~> the

seventh part, as fifteen Suras make up about one-seventh of the Qur&n.
Elpherar omits the word l5'V;>» in the latter passage, a. fact not satis-
factorily accounted for by the supposition that he relied on an earlier
explanation, for the Arabic writers always give the unexplained passages
in full in their commentaries ; and thus it seems that this word must
have been altogether missing from Elpherar's text.

° D';nK5 n^l^pa ■^ ^aa-iXeia Twv ovpavav.
3 Sdra VI. 75, VII. 184, XXIII. 90, XXXVI. 83.

< JjX.' or iivU {'^^''^)

* Compare the words ul>^XUJ\ |»3lc in Professor Freitag's work, Fakiha
Elcholafa 85. 3.

^ Ajuiw, t^*xl*# God's guiding Presence.

^UIj j is'*^" Revelation,

^A£i K.:t^Uif- , j*-^^ Judgment after death,

VIEWS BORROWED FROM JUDAISM. 45

of revelation, furqdn, masani ; of judgment after deatli,
jannatu ' adn and jahannanij besides others which will be
brought forward as peculiar to Judaism.

Second Part.

Views borrowed from Judaism.

While in the foregoing section we were content to
consider it certain that a conception was derived from
Judaism, if the word expressing that conception could be
shown to be of Jewish origin, we must now pass on from
this method of judging and adopt a new test. We must
prove first in detail that the idea in question springs from
a Jewish root ; then to attain to greater certainty we must
farther shew that the idea is in harmony with the spirit of
Judaism, that apart from Judaism the conception would
lose in importance and value, that it is in fact ouly an off-
shoot of a great tree. To this argument may be added the
opposition, alluded to in the Quran itself, which this foreign
graft met with from both Arabs and Christians. For tlie
better arrangement of these views we must divide them
into three groups : A. Matters of Creed or Doctrinal views,
B. Moral and legal rules, and G. Views of Life.

A. Doctrinal Views.

We must here set a distinct limit for ourselves, in order
on the one hand that we may not drift away into an endless
undertaking and attempt to expound the whole Quran ;
and on the other that we may not go off into another
subject altogether and try to set forth the theology of the
Quran ; an undertaking which was begun with considerable
success in the Tubingen Zeitschrift fiir Evang. Theol. 1831,
3tes Heft. Furthermore, certain general points of belief
are so common to all mankind that the existence of any
one of them in one religion must not be considered as

46 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

proving a borrowing from another. Other views again
are so well-known and so fully worked out that we need
not discuss them in detail, but shall find a mere mention
of them sufficient. Of this kind is that of the idea of the
unity of God, the fundamental doctrine of Israel and Islam.
At the time of the rise of the latter, this view was to be
found in Judaism alone, 1 and therefore Muhammad must
have borrowed it from that religion. This may be consi-
dered as proved without any unnecessary display of learning
on the point. The idea of future reward and punishment
is common to all religions, but it is held in so many
different ways that we shall be obliged to consider it in
our argument. Cardinal points of faith have also passed
from Judaism into Christianity. To decide whether these
points as adopted in the Quran have come from the Jews
or from the Christians, we must direct our special attention
to a comparison between the forms in which the beliefs are
held in both those religions, and the form in which they
are presented to us by Muhammad. This is to answer the
objection, that in the following discussion so little is to be
found about the cardinal dogmas, for even the enumeration
of them is foreign to our purpose.

Every religion which conceives God as an active work-
ing providence must have some distinct teaching on the
creation, and this Muhammad gives in accordance with the
Bible, viz., that God created heaven and earth and all that
therein is in six days ; 2 although in another place he
diverges somewhat and says that the earth was created in
two days, the mountains and the green herbs in four days,
and the heavens with all their divisions in two days more.^
Though this passage is nothing but a flight of poetic fancy,
still it shews how little Muhammad knew of the Bible,
inasmuch as he is aware of nothing but the general fact

' Christianity also teaohea the Unity of God/ Ed.

« S^lras X. 3, XI. 9, L, 37, LVII. 4. ' Sura XLI. 8—11.

THE SEVEN HEAVENS. 47

that tbe creation took place in six days, and that he has not
ally knowledge of each day's separate work. We have
already remarked that he calls the seventh day saht, but
does not recognise its sanctity. It remains here to be
added that Muhammad appears to allude to and reject the
Jewish belief that God rested on the seventh day. l He
evidently thought that a necessity for rest after hard
labour was implied, for after mentioning the creation as
having taken place in six days, he adds " and no weariness
affected TJs." On this Jalalu'd-din comments as follows :2
" This was revealed as an answer to the Jews who said
that God had rested thoroughly on the sabbath and there-
fore weariness left Him." The same thing is to be found
in Blpherar's commentary but not so clearly expressed.

The idea of several heavens, which is indicated by the
Biblical expression " heaven of heavens, " 3 came to Muham-
mad probably from the Jews, also the notion that they
were seven in number, a notion due to the different
names applied to heaven. In Chagiga * we find the assertion
that there are seven heavens, and then the names are
given. All these names occur in the Scripture except the
first, viz. vilon, from the Latin velum. 5 This name in which
heaven is compared to a curtain, which veils the glory of &
God, is a very important one in the Talmud. Muhammad
speaks often of the seven heavens, ^ and in one passage he

* Sura L. 37.

* Maraoci. ut«-«J\ |.^ cW^ '^'^ O^ f^^ tS* '^^^ iJ* ^^i Jy

* Chagiga 9. 2. b^l^t tt'^p!!?? S'^pT I'iVm ]!! TTPT^. nS5t£7

many. ^Saio ]ii>a

' Cf. Midrash on the Psalms at the end of Psalm xi.

' vi)^»*-J\ ^-— . or ^— J\ i^ft W

Suras II. 27, XVII. 46, XXIII.88, XLI.ll, LXV. 12, LXVII. 3, LXXI. 14.

48 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

calls the heavens the seven strongholds l and in another
the seven paths. 2 This last expression occurs also in the
Talmud. 3 During the creation, however, His throne was
upon the waters. "^ This idea also is borrowed from the
Jews, who say : 5 " The throne of glory then stood in the
air, and hovered over the waters by the command of God. "
This is somewhat more clearly expressed by Elpherar who
says : " And this water was in the middle of the air. " 6

A second pivot of every revealed religion is the belief
in a judgment after death ; for while the fact of the
creation sets forth the omnipotence of the Creator, the
doctrine of a final account teaches that it is God's will that
His revealed laws shall be obeyed. This, then, in Judaism
developed into a local Paradise and Hell, and both concep-
tions have passed, as we have already shown, into Islam.
These localities, although at first mere symbols, mere
embodiments of the spiritual idea of a state, afterwards
became crystallised, and suffered the fate of every symbol,
i.e., they were taken for the thing symbolised, and the
places were more definitely indicated. Thus the Jews

* J^JA jt-i Siira LXXVIII. 12.

* (J'l>^ e-^' s^"^* xxiri. 17.
3 T'n-n ''Y^p

. C^ - _ J J c.

* Sura XI. 9. eUJ\ Jic iA^c yl?

* Rashi on Gen. I. 2. bv ?in-1l5^ 11^3 laij niaS SD3

Sin •^1^3 ti?iii?n b^ va mna n':an ^a?

Cf. |iJiijrt>p5\ Sura XXIir. 88, XXVII. 26,
"l^ly^\ J.j^\, XXIII. 117, La,'^T J'j'S'^ LXXXV. 15.
with 1133 N33

* CV'^ O^" 'J'^ °^*'^ "^'"^ <J^)

THE SEVEN HELLS. 49

have a saying :l " The world is the sixtieth part of the
garden, the garden is the sixtieth part of Eden ; " 2 and in
the Qurin we find a similar expression, viz., " paradise
whose breadth equalleth the heavens and the earth : ^
Generally speaking, fear is stronger than hope, and the
dread of a terrible condemnation appeals far more
powerfully than the hope of eternal happiness to a nature
which pure religious feeling does not impel to piety of
life. This is probably the reason for describing hell in a
more detailed and particular manner than Paradise.

Seven hells are pictured as forming different grades of
punishment, and these have been developed out of the
seven different names mentioned in the Talmud. * These
names with one exception ^ (Erets tahtith, subterranean
realm, which is clearly adopted from the Roman ideas at
the time of their ascendancy) are Biblical. Later on these
names came to be construed as seven hells, e. g. in
the Midrash on the Psalms at the end of the eleventh
Psalm where ^ it is said, " there are seven abodes of the
wicked in hell, " after which the above mentioned names
are cited with a few variations. It is also said that David
by a sevenfold reiterated cry of " my son " 0??) rescued
Absalom from the seven habitations of hell ; ^ furthermore
hell is said to have seven portals. 8 Muhammad is not

» ]i5a D''t£7t»a -inw yi 73? D'^tpt^p ins r^rs

' Taanith 10. Pesachim 94.

3 Sftia III. 127. i>jS^j kiu\ji-J\ \^fi

♦ niabs"! ivn q^'Ei'i lists -lia^ nnt» -)sa^ li'=i?Mi bistr

See Erubin 19. 1. rT^Wnri VT^N"!
7 2 Sam, xix. 1-5. (Sota 10.) D'3n''2 "'1^1X5 ny2tl7

' Q'sn^ab ■ i^ss I'nne to3£» Zohar 11. iso-

50' JUDAISM AND ISLIm.

behind hand, for we read in one passage that 1 " it (hell)
hath seven gates, unto every gate a distinct company
of them shall be assigned. " According to the Jews,
a tree stands at the entrance to hell : 2 " Two date palms
grow in the valley of Ben Hinnom, smoke issues from
between them and this is the entrance to hell " j but
Muhammad knows a tree of hell called Al Zaqqdm 3 which
serves sinners for food, about which he has much to relate.
The step from such a definite idea of hell to the notion of a
personality connected with it is an easy one, and we find
such an individual mentioned by the Eabbis as the " prince
of Gehinnom ; " * he is called however in the Qur^n simply
Jahannam. In one Eabbinical book 5 we find the following :
" That the prince of hell says daily, Give me food to satisfy
me, comes from Isaiah, v. 14. " Muhammad says similarly: ^
" On that day We will say unto hell, ' Art thou full ? ' and
it shall say ' Are there more ' ? "

When the conceptions of Paradise and hell became so
definite, and their names were no longer general terms for
reward and punishment, a third destination had to be
provided for those whose conduct had n,ot been such as to

» Sdra XT. 44. ^^~J- ■ys- ^^ vV 0^_ vl^l ■»<- W

» sukkah 32. iwv n^'S] D'an p •'35 t».^ niiBO ^m

3 ^^^\ S^ SArns XXXTII. 60, XLIV. 43.

6 Othioth Derabbi Akiba, 8. 1. Q'Sn^J bt? nnfe^ ^^P

n-nn il^ P^ ''bab n^s nn^c^i nt»?3 bist? na^n^n

na Tbn nsiNtrn m^K:r^^

T ■• T : T . T

^ Sura L. 29. ^.y ^^a» Ja Jyi5 ^ ci>ft;>-\ Ja ^¥^6^ J^> f*^-

al-a'rap. 51

entitle them to the former uor condemn them to the latter
place. Thus while the righteous l found their place in
Paradise, and the sinners had their portion in hell, those
who belonged to neither class were placed in a space
between Paradise and Hell, of which it is said in th.e
Midrash on Ecclesiastes, vii. 14: 2 " How much room is there
between them ? Eabbi Jochanan says a wall ; R. Acha
says a span ; other teachers however hold that they are so
close together that people can see from one into the
other. " 3 The idea just touched upon in this passage is
most poetically worked out in Snra VII. 44,4 "And
between the blessed and the damned there shall be a veil ;

' □''p"''^? righteous, C^E?"! sinEers.
D''3i3''3 those who staad between.

' nas sns '^an bns -!»s ■j^ni"' "-a-i Dn'':"'a m-i nas

-T T - • - V - T 'tT • - ...-■• - V 1 T -

itb ira ni^'^^a ^^rt^w •'-ta n^^w lu^nw ^naw 7?2"l"! nsa

' Conceraing this intermediaie place S'adi cleverly remarks that it seems
to the blessed as hell, to the lost as paradise (D'Herbelot Bibliotheque
Orientale under A'rdf. page 115).

* Blpherar comments on this passage as follows :

^»9-o iU\ |jA(^ j_5ic. ^Ua ^)°^)' )^^ U* ^U~s. ^ \^^jj\jsJ )

" These are those whose good and evil deeds are so evenly balanced that
the latter preclude them from paradise, while the former save them from
hell, therefore they remain standing here until Gcd has declared His
pleasure concerning them." And later, when he gives our explanation of
verse 45 in a long chain of traditions, he says :

,_jlc \Jii^ <_i\jcS^ i^Vas^t (^ (^\S i;L_._j 4JU~i. ci>y:_o\ y^J
fX. \,j\i iisJ\ ^\ yj UVi jUJ^ Ji^ _, i;i,5J\ ^\ \,l^ 1^ l\j^\

jUJ\ v'W"^ 1^^ i*")^-^^ ^j*;" ^'^^ } 1*^^

" Those whose good and evil deeds are equal are the middle men and
stand on the road. Thence they can see at once the inhabitants of
paradise and those of hell ; if they turn to the former, they cry ' Peace be
unto you :' if to the latter " etc.

52 JUDATSM AND ISLAM.

and men sliall stand on Al-Arif who stall know tliem by
their marks ; and shall call unto the inhabitants of Paradise
saying, Peace be upon yoa ; yet they shall not enter therein,
though they earnestly desire it. And when they 1 shall
turn their eyes towards the companions of hell fire, they
rejoice that they are not among them, and shew them the
folly of their earthly walk and hopes. "

It is interesting to compare this view of a threefold
dealing with the dead with the very similar Platonic idea.2

The idea of the bliss of eternal life, as well as the
metaphor which expresses the difficulty of attaining it, is
common to the Qur^n and Judaism. There is a Rabbinical
saying 3 to the efiect that "one hour of rapture in that
world is better than a whole life-time in this." With this
we may compare the Quran : ■* " And what is this life in
comparison with the life to come except a passing amuse-
ment ? " Then for the difficulty of attaining Paradise we
may compare the Rabbinical picture ^ of the elephant
entering the needle's eye with the words in Snra VII. 38 6
" Neither shall they enter into paradise until a camel pass
through the eye of a needle. " This last metaphor seems
to be borrowed from Christianity, (partly because of the
similarity of the figure, in that " camel " is the metaphor
used in the Gospels, and partly because of the frequent
mention of the same by the Evangelists) ^ , and is only

* " They '' i e. the men between, not as Wahl and others explain it.
^ Phaedon, Chap. 62.

3 Miahna Aboth, IV, 17. m.ip bC? nV}^ n^tt? Tl^>

Ti-fp r2\yar\ •'"n baa wan o^iva r\>n

* S<lraa IX. 88, XIII. 26. gtw S\ S/.ST^ V;J^T ^^iTu^

' Sdra VII. 38. ^^T ^*- ^_ J*^ ^'
' Matt, xix. 24 ; Mark, i. 25 ; Luke, XTiii. 24.

TIJE FUTURE LIFE. 53

deserving of mention here, because the fact that ia the
Talmud elephant is used seems to confirm the ordinary
translation of the Greek word in the Gospels, and the Arabic
word in the Quran, and to remove the doubt as to whether
they might not be better rendered "cable."

Given the pure conception of immortality viz., that the
life of the soul never ceases, it becomes unnecessary to fix
a time at which the judgment shall take place; and so in
most Talmudic passages a future world is pictured ^ in
which every thing earthly is stripped away and pious souls
enjoy the brightness of God's Presence. 2 Echoes of this
teaching are to be found in the Qur^n. In one passage ^
we read of a soul gazing on its Lord, and in another 4
the condition of a perfectly peaceful soul is beautifully
described. But this entirely spiritual idea was not
thoroughly carried out. Rather by the side of the pure
conception of a continued life of the soul after the death
of the bocly,5 there existed that of the quickening of the
dead.6 Thus because the man cannot receive the requital

T • : - • * '•'.■: V

3 Sura LXXV. 23. IlG l^J J\
- - a

* Sura LXXXIX. 27 ff. ii£*U

' Take e. g. the Rabbinical saying :

Q>»ri D^^-I|7 nnn'^ag ^VCS D'^i^'^'^'j; " Even in their death the right-
eons are oa)led living; " and in Suras II. 149, III. 163, it is ordpred that
those who fall in holy vrar shall not be called uu\«/»^ dead, but bL=.\ living.

The view that by the expression Teohiyath Hammethim the future
world or the (spiritual) continued life of the (bodily) dead is meant, ia
given clearly in the explanation which a Baraitha adds to the quoted
utterance of the Mishna. To the words : " he who asserts that the belief
in Teohiyath Hammethim is no part of the Jewish religion baa no part in

54 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

of his deeds while he is still in a state of death, the time of
resurrection must be the time for the judgment.*

These two views of the resurrection and the judgment
day, though different in themselves, are both closely
connected in Judaism and more especially in Islam. 2 In
Judaism there is a third period the advent of a Messiah,
which it is not easy to separate from the other two.
Naturally this time, which is to bring forth two such
important events as judgment and resurrection, will be
ushered in by terrible signs. In Judaism statements to
this effect are to be found only about the third period, which
is generally connected with the other two, viz., the earth-
ly period of the Messiah ; in Isl^m on the contrary every-
thing is attributed to the last day. The utterance most in
accord with the Talmud is that in Sunnas 41 and 141, which
says that learning shall vanish, ignorance shall take root,
drunkenness and immorality shall increase. With this we
must compare the passage in Sanhedrin 97 : 3 " At the time
when David's son comes the learned diminish, and the
place of learned meetings serves for immorality." The
descriptions in the Qur£n refer more to the last day itself,
and remind us of many passages in Holy Scripture, where
it is also said of those days that the world will bow
itself before God, the heavens will be rolled together 4 and

the fature«rorld," he adds: "he denies the T. H., therefore he has no
more a portion in it." Here the expression CDan rCPin and
" f Qture, world" are taken as identical in meaning. Compare too the
Book Ikkarim, IV. 31.

2 Compare, e.g. Sura XXVI. 87. 88.

' i:s5n iT'an nitprnn!? D'^ajn •'I'-obri sa ti'^ ^ad -liT

* Siiras XXI. 104, XXXIX. 67.

Cf. D^atiJrr -1535 ^iVbal Isaiah XXXIV, -1.

aoa AND MAGOa. oo

vanish in smoke,! all cities will be destroyecl,^ and men
will be drunken and yet not drunken.3

Another very distinct sign of the advent of a Messiah,
which is remotely alluded to in the Bible but which
attained to an extraordinary development in the Talmud
and especially in later writings, is the battle of Gog, Prince
of Magog. 4 Grog and Magog are, however, named by the
Eabbis as two princes, and this view has taken root in the
Quran in the Eabbinical form ,5 since two persons, Gog
and Magog, are mentioned as dwellers in the uttermost
parts of the earth. 6

In the details of the idea of future retribution many
resemblances are to be found, which, by virtue of the unity
of the Jewish view and its derivation from the Scriptures,
shew themselves as borrowings from Judaism. Thus
according to the Talmud, a man's limbs themselves shall
give testimony against him ; 1 in one passage we find these
words : " The very members of 8 a man bear witness against
him, for it is said : ' Ye yourselves are my witnesses saith the
Lord.'" With this we may compare Sura XXIV. 24:9
" Their own tongues, and hands, and feet, shall one day be
witness against them of their own doings. 10 The judgment

' Sura XLIV. 9 ff.

2 Sura XVII. 60.

3 Sijra XXII. 2. Comp. Suras XXVII. 89, XXXIX. G8, LXIX. 13 ff.
Bzekiel, xxxviii. and xxziz.

'Sura XXI. 96. ^^U.^ g^^T

* Sura XVIII. 93.

' Chagiga 16, Taanith 11.

"n nN3 ny ortsi. '3t» 'la w^T^'a d^h be? V";2'«n fin

^ Ifiaiah, xliii, 12.

'" Cf. also Suras XXXVI. 65, XLI. 19.

56 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

day gains also a greater importance from the fact that not
only individuals and nations appear at it, but also those
beings who have been honoured as gods by the nations,
and they too receive punishment with their worshippers.
In Sukkah XXIX we find this statement : 1 "As often as a
nation (on account of idolatry) receives its punishment,
those beings honoured by it as gods shall also be punished ;
for, it is written : 2 "■ Against all the gods of Egypt I will
execute judgment.' " That this general sentence admits of
a reference to the punishment of the last day is not expressly
stated, but it is worthy of acceptation. Muhammad
expresses himself still more clearly about it:^ " Yerily
both ye and the idols which ye worship besides God shall
be cast as fuel into hell fire."

A view closely interwoven with Judaism and Islam
is that retributive punishment is entirely confined to the
state after death, and that any single merit which a sinner
has gained will be rewarded in this world, to the end that
nothing may impede the course of judgment in the next.
The same view, only reversed, holds good in the case of the
righteous. It is a view which was thought to explain the
course of destiny upon earth, which so often seems to run
contrary to the merits and demerits of men.

The Rabbinical view is expressed in the following
passage : 4 " Whereunto are the pious in this world to be

' ri?"!^ ^^U^^. r^'? ^\f^ *^''nt» nasi nas) bb r]b ^''w

D'>t?Qt» Tibv)^ D^l"a '^nbN b^?^ 'zw nai?

' Bxodns, xii. 12.

' Sura XXI. 98. ^.^ 4--^ ^ 0)^ CT* yj-^ '^ J "f^^

* -iris ib?t» "iVsib 'n-m obisa □''bttJa? ty^';)>'^-$ nab
ibs s'^aa iQi: v^P? '^*?*??> t:ipab n^b iQiai n-fni^ cipa?
Q^'iT'^a b3? tsn.^is"; N''3a n '2 "^ti •^^3 -lina dipas ip5

RABBINICAL VIEW OV THE FCIUEB LIPE. 57

compared ? To a tree wbicli stands entirely in a clean
place ; and when a brancli bends to an unclean place, it is
cat off and the tree itself stands there quite clean. Thus
Grod sends afflictions in this world to the righteous, that
they may possess that which is to come, as it is written :
' Though thy beginning was small, yet thy latter end
should greatly increase.' l Sinners are like a tree which
stands in an altogether unclean place ; if a branch bends
over to a clean place, it is cut off and the tree itself stands
there quite unclean. Thus God allows the ungodly to
prosper, in order to plunge them into the lowest depth of
hell, as it is written : ' There is a way which seemeth right
unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.' " 2
Muhammad expresses this same view in several passages,
but restricts himself to the latter part which refers to the
prosperity C'f sinners, partly because his own ideas were too
unspiritual for him to be able to imagine the righteous as
truly happy without earthly goods, partly because in so
doing his teaching would have lost in acceptability to
his very degraded contemporaries. Thus in one passage 3
we read : " We grant them long and prosperous lives only

ibsB? iVsb ?niJ2 D'^oii Q'^vwi, nab^i Ysa sab"*, ^n'^-insi"!
•ib3 iQi: v^pa nnnc nipob ni^^b •isi:'! nsiat? m'piaa lai?
Tn3J2 nnia onb VQtoa n"2 "jjn ?f3 nsiaia oiptts iris?
U7."; '5?? D3n>2 b^ n;innnri ranixsb ^ajninb^i 111^^ ""l?
mia •<3-ii HiT^-inMi e?''n >iQh ~iw> -j-ii

V T ■• : - T • -; - : ■ •• : • t t ' vv

1 Job, viii. 7.

' Proverbs, xiv. 12. Kiddnshin, 40. 2. Compare Dereoh Ereta j Sutta
end of Chap. II ; Aboth of Rabbi Nathan, end of Chap. IX ; Erubin 26. 2 j
also the Targams and their Commentators on Deuteronomy, vii. 10,

' Sdra III. 172. tj\ y\jp )^ JUi Cj\

a ' ' a

58 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

that their iniquity may be increased," l still the second
view is to be found among the Arabians also, e.g., Blpherar
in his comments on Qurd.n XII. 42 2 says : " It is said that
the righteous are punished and tried, in order that the day
of resurrection may be perfect in light and power, as the
contumacy of the righteous has been already expiated."
Muhammad naturally avoided specifying any time at
which the judgment should take place, though he was
much pressed to do so. He excused himself with the
•Jewish saying that with God a thousand years are as
one day, 3 which was divested of its poetic adornment
and taken by the Eabbis in a purely literal sense. *
Muhammad says ^ : " Verily one day with thy Lord is as a
thousand years of those which ye compute" ; and again ^ :
" On the day whose length shall be a thousand years
of those which ye compute."

As has been already shown, with the establishment of

1 Compare Sura IX. 55, 86, XXXI. 23. In IX. 55, 86, the worda
UijJ\ (6j<ka»5\) j_si are evidently to be connected with *aijS,T and not
with what immediately precedes.

Thus Elpherar Bays on IX. 55 : aJJ^oj i^'i\ ^i Sjba , A4.Va-»J\ JU

Mujihid and Ketadd Bay that this verse has been transposed, it should
ran . " Let not therefore their riches or their children in this world cause
thee to marvel. Verily God intendeth only to punish them by these
things in that world. "

' Psalm, xo. 4.

♦ Sanhedrin 96. 2. See also Preface to Ben Ezra's Commentary on the
Pentateuch where he opposes this view.

5 S^ra XXII. 46. yjSi? C. ^ .-A^tf S^j 1^ C^' ^\
« Sura XXXII. 4. ' ' ' ' ' *

THB KESUEEECTION OP THE BODY. 59

tlie doctrine of the day of iudgment, the view of
the resurrection and of the quickening of the dead was
also formed ; and this the more readily, because it found
support in expressions in the Scripture, as e.g. those in
Ezekiel, xxxvii. 1 : " I have opened your graves, and caused

you to come up out of your graves, ye shall

live," etc. ; and those in other passages referring partly to
the metaphorical quickening of the dead land of Israel.
Of this doctrine it is said that it is such a fundamental
teaching of the Jewish faith that the declaration that
it did not belong to the law entailed the exclusion of him
who thus spoke from eternal life. 2 The Quran is, so
to speak, founded upon this doctrine along with that
of the unity of God, and there is scarcely a page in it
where this doctrine is not mentioned. To adduce proofs
here would be as easy as it would be useless; and indeed
it is not required by our purpose, since Christianity also
has inherited this view from Judaism, as is shown in the
argument of Jesus in refutation of the Sadducees. Only
one point deserves particular mention, because on the one
hand it contains a detail adopted from Judaism, and on
the other it shows the low level of thought at that time.

As soon as it becomes a question not merely of the
immortality of the soul, but also of the resurrection of the
body, then the soul without its body is no longer regarded
as the same person, and the question naturally presents
itself to the ordinary understanding : " How can this body
which we have seen decay rise again, so that the same
personality shall reappear ?" Neither the soul alone nor
the body alone is the person, but the union of the two.
Now one part of this union is dissolved ; another body can
indeed be given to this soul, but by this means he who died

' Ezekiel, xxxvii. 13. D?"'rn-l5p-n.M "'11035

Sura C. 9. j^\^jiC.yi«}
' Misbna Sanbedrin X, 1

60 JUDAISM mo ISI(i.M,

d,oes not reappear, but a new man, another personality,
another Qonsciousnesa comes into l?eing. This question dimly
anticipated obtrudes itself, and can only be set at rest by,
proving that the v^ry, same personality can, appear again.
Instead of showing this Muhammad contents himself with
the parable, used also occasionally in the Talmud, of the
renewal of the dried up earth by fertilising rain. He found
however, that he could not silence the common convictions
of men thereby, l and sp he was compelled to come back
to it again and again. The Jews also sought to give
prominence to this resemblance, and they put the eulo-
gium 2 "Who sendeth dpwn the rain " into the second
benediption which treats of the resurrection. ^ The fact
that the righteous, rise actually in their clothes^ (which
after, all is not more woi^derful than in their hodies) is
explained by the parable of the grain of wheat, which
is laid in the earth without covering, but springs up again
with many coverings. The passage in Qurdn VI. 96
contains a similar statement. This vieWi isnqt strange to
Islam, for, a saying \7hich is attributed to Muhammad runs
thus: 5, "The dead, man shall be raised in the clothes in
which he died. "

That from the standpoint of, revealed, religion the belief
in the possibility, of revelation is fundamental need^^ of
course no proof, and in this the views, of all revealed
religions are alike ; yet difEerencps can be found in the
manner of conceiving pfi the revelation, and here, we
recognise again that Muhammad derived his view of. it
from Judaism, of course with some n^pdificatipn,

1 SuraB VI. 95, XXX. 49, XXXVI. 33, XLI. 39, XLIII. 10, etc,

> amr; f^nin

^ Taanith at the beginniiig.

* Sanhedrin 90. 2, and Kethtibhoth III, 2.

(Poo. notra miso, cap. 7, p, 271.)

Muhammad's view o5 inspiration. 61

The Jew^ have a saying that "all the prophets saw
through a dark glass, but Moses through a clear one, " i and
Muhammad says : 2 It was not granted to a man that God
should speak unto him otherwise than in a vision or from
behind a veil ; 3 and then he adds : 4 " or by the sending of
a messenger to reveal by His permission that which He
pleaseth. " This messenger is the Holy Spirit, 5 or simply
the spirit, 6 like the spirit in the story of Micaiah's vision. 7
The Arabic commentators take this holy spirit to mean
(rabriel, a view which is not unknown to the Jews, fur

' Jebamoth 49. n-J'^ND n^'^Sti? Ni-lbpQDH2 -IM-l n">N''22n bs

" Sura XLII. 50. ^V^ 7\-j y« J\ Ll^ \ -^^ Ij^ ^^ ^ ^^ V^^

* Commentators cite this verse as one in which the superiority of Moses
is disputed ; thus Elpherar says :

,j-iy» 1^ w i\j>, Sj i"S^ ix*—^^, s->^s=- o\)j (^ j\ c'^^^k j\ (•W!\

" The Jews said to Muljammad; 'By God! if thou art a prophet, dost
thou speak with God and see Ilim as Moses spoke with Him and saw Him i' '
Then he said : ' Moses did not see God. ' And then came this verse :
' It was not granted to a man that God should speak to him, except in
a vision, in a dream or through supemat;ural inspiration, or from behind
a curtain, so that man hears His Voice, but does not see Him ; He spoke
thus to Moses also. ' "

, J— - _ C J- = ..- J Cj ex

— a- -

* y-^ Cjj tt?ipn n^l, TO TTvev/ia ayiov
« Cjy Suraa LXXVIII. 38, XCYII. 4.

' rynj^ ns.*i i Kings, xxii. 2,1.

62 JDDAISM AND ISLAM.

the Jewish commentators understand the words 1 " the
definitely speaking Spirit" to refer to Gabriel. One of
Muhammad's own utterances, one which is fully explained
only by the o2nd Sunna, is much more striking : ^ " And
they will ask thee of the spirit, say : the spirit (proceedeth)
at my Lord's command. "

With this the teaching about angels is closely connected,
and it also had its beginning in Scripture, but appears to
have been developed in later days especially through
Parseeism. Muhammad is unwearied in his descriptions
of angels ; so too are the later .Jews in their many prayers
on the day of atonement, but these are of rather late
origin. 3 The angel of death 4 is specially mentioned in
Sura XXXII. 11.

While angels were regarded as purely spiritual beings
who execute God's commands, a class of beings was
imagined who stood between man and the purest spirits ;
these were mixed spirits, who were made out of fire, ^ who
possessed superior mental powers, but who were mostly
inclined to evil, they were called ^ demons, but there are
numerous other names for them in Arabic. The Talmud
has the following statement about them : ^ " Demons

' rr'apDQ mn Santedrini*.

■'t : "

2 Siira XTII. 87. Jj j^l ^ ij)\ Ji cjJT (^ csUyU;

M—CBC joJ-o J a-ts - ^-jSC

3 Compare Suras XXXV. 1, XXXVII. 1, XL. 7, LXXVII. 1 ff.
LXXIX. 11 ff.

< S<ira XXXII. 11. ^^.^, p^j^j^ ^yi,^
5 SAra XV. 27.

' nn.t^n •'ssbas r\dbw Dnt^a Dnnw nnnn nwvi
D\Q^'3 Dnb t£?;. nn^ii •'aN.bn? ndbw oi^ \a?3 naJbtpi

DEMONS.

are declared to possess six qualities, three of whicli are
angelic and three human. The three which pertain to
angels are that they have wings, that they can fly from one
end of the earth to the other {i. e. they are bound by no
space), and that they know the future beforehand. They
know the future beforehand ? No ! but they listen behind
the curtain. The three human qualities are that they eat
and drink, increase and multiply, ^ and die. " ^ Muslim
tradition cannot do enough in their description, but there
is but little about them in the Qur£n. The fact that they
listened at the canopy of heaven gained for them in the
Qurdn the nickname of the stoned, 3 for, say the commen-
tators, the angels threw stones to drive them away when
they found them listening. 4 Thus it is said expressly : 5
" We have appointed them (the lamps of heaven) to be
darted at the devils. " The seventy-second Sira treats of
them in detail, and seeks especially to set forth their assent
to the new doctrine. The Talmud also states that they
are present at the giving of instruction. The following

l^v'^v nrnb i^nvw na T'i?"Ti^i ^)p\^D lv^ obijyn ?i"iD!a rpt;!
Di« •'323 naJbtiJ^ liansn i-iinsa vvaw sbw Trnri wpbo

Ti •' : • T : - - "• -: •■ • • : t v '-.■;- 't : t

" The genii are supposed to be a species of angels, and the devil is their
father j he has thns a posterity, which is mentioned with him ; the
(remaining) angels however have no posterity." JalAlu'ddin in Maracc
Prodr. II. 15.

' Chagiga 16. 1.

3 Suras XV. 17, 34, XXXVIII. 78, LXXXI. 24. ^J

' The Muslim explanation of falling stars.

» 0^-\'A^ UjLj UUii} Sura LXVII. 5 ; compare Stxia, XXXVII. 7.

64 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

passage from the Berachoth shows this : " The press in the
school is caused by them, the demons. " 1 With this we
may compare the Qurin : " When the servant of God stood
up to invoke Him, it wanted little but that the genii had
pressed on him in crowds. " 2 It cannot be maintained that
the greater part of the teaching about genii was adopted
from Judaism, it must rather be said to have come from
the same dark source whence the Jews of those times drew
these conceptions, viz., Parseeism.

Still here, as in the case of any point which is of
inaccessible origin, a reference to a mere similarity is not
without use.

Under these four heads then, viz., (]) Creation, (2)
Retribution including the Last Judgment and the Resur-
rection, (3) Mode of Revelation, and (4) Doctrine of Spirits,
details are found, the adoption of which from Judaism we
may regard as sufficiently proved. The precaution against
representing, out of love for our theme, that which is
common either to the general religious feelings of
mankind, or to all revealed religions, or at least that which
belonged to other known religious parties in Muhammad's
time as peculiar only to Judaism, compels us to fix these
limits. We have found much of interest especially under
the second head, so that the demands of our theme might
seem to be fairly well satisfied.

B. Moral and Legal Rules.

It is obvious that in a revealed religion all individual
commands form part of the religion, and therefore one
cannot draw any sharp line of distinction between the
" religious " and the " moral. " We have accordingly

>s>in >in^3a nba n''51 ^PJ^'^.. ^^^

2 Sdra LXXII. 19, 'fjJJ *5c a/^ h^^

MOKAL AND LEGAL RULES. 65

considered nofhing whicTi has to do with conduct under
the heading A, even though it might be immediately con-
nected with the points of belief under discussion and so we
are able to bring together here all commands as to conduct.
From the fact that every individual command is DivinCj a
conflict of duties may easily arise, which cannot be readily
decided by private judgment, seeing that all the command-
ments are equal, l so far as their Author is concerned.
Rules for such cases must therefore be laid down. For
instance, we find the following statement in the Eabbinical
writings : 2 " If a father saith (to his son if he is a priest),
' defile thyself ' ; or if he saith, ' Make not restitution (of the
thing found to the owner) ', shall he obey him ? Therefore,
it is written: 3 'Let e very 1 man reverence his father and
mother, but keep my Sabbaths all of you, ye are all bound
to honour me. ' " And Muhammad says -. i " We have
commanded man to show kindness towards his parents,
but if they endeavour to prevail with thee to associate
with me that concerning which thou hast no knowledge,
obey them not. "

' Fakihat Elcholefa, 94, proves that thia is really the Arabic view :

i^ y-Isr J JV» ^ST v»W J^ j^^. u^jj S^/*S\ uiJW*

" A meritorious man says that in the sins of men there is nothing
small, bat whatever is done contrary to the Commandment is great
with respect to Him who commands, who is exalted and holy."

» Jebamoth 6. bsi ib "IHS i« SStsn V2N ib -ISN

^s-i"'ri V3W1 iaw a'''« la^^b ^ii^'^n ib raip"; bio; innn

5 Levitiona, xix. 3.

* Sura XXIX. 7. cs),Ai5 usJ^AfcW y\ ) U_=. ii'ii\ji yL-jS\ Wojj

- - * - - - g

60 JUDAISM ANT) ISLAM.

Judaism is knowu to be very rich in single precepts, and
Muhammad has borrowed from it much that seemed to him
suitable.

1. Prayer. Muhammad like the Eabbis prescribes the
standing position 1 for prayer. Thus : " Stand obedient to
the Lord ; but if ye fear any danger, then pray while walk-
ing or riding" ; 2 and also : " Who standing, and sitting,
and reclining, bear God in mind." 3

These three positions are mentioned again in Sura X.
13 : 4 " When evil befalleth a man he prayeth unto us,
lying on his side or sitting or standing, " where with a true
perception of the right order, the least worthy position is
the first spoken of. 5

BaidhAwi comments thus on Sura III. 188, the passage
alluded to above : " The meaning is that the man may take
any of the three positions according to his strength, as
Muhammad said to Amr£n Ibn Husain : ' Pray standing if
thou art able ; if not, sitting ; and if thou canst not sit up,
then leaning on the side. " ^ The Jews were not so strict in
this matter, yet they too have the rule that prayer should
be offered standing j 7 and in Eabbinical writings it is also

' Note the technical expression iXi^ lt»\

comp. Eabb. nbsna la^

» Sura II. 240. \il^j"\ SWji ^»j^ y\i ^\J a5 \^^J
3 Sura III. 188. ^^ ^J^j Wyuj UU5

' Cf. also Sura IV. 46.

' SU\ Mc dJjSJ ^tt, .,..>.^ ^hi\ uyUa5\ Js, y^ 6U*^
gk! — ; ^ yU WVoi (i=x — 5 ^ yU \^\i j^ (^^^^ ^^ y\j^ ^ — )]j

' f&VI^ Tl'h^rr\ Cf. Beraohoth X.

PRAYER. 67

said that he who rides on an ass is to dismount, but the
addition is made that, if he cannot dismount he is to turn
his face (towards Jerusalem) . ^ As the bodily position may
be altered ia urgent cases, so the prayer itself may be
shortened on similar occasions. 2 So we find the permission
to shorten prayer in time of war : " When ye march to
war in the earth, 3 it shall be no crime in you if ye shorten
your prayers." The Jews also were permitted to pray a
short prayer when in a dangerous place. * Muhammad is
quite opposed to senseless chattering, for he counts it a
merit in believers to " eschew all vain discourse. 5 There-
fore because attention and . pious concentration of thought
are to be aimed at, he enjoins ^ on believers not to draw
near to prayer when they are drunk. This is in accord-
ance with the Talmudic rule : " Prayer is forbidden to
the drunken. " ■^ It is also forbidden to those who have
touched women. ^ These persons may not engage in

» Mishna Berachoth IV. 5. Ti"< nicnn bi? niii n'<n

■ ' " TT

V3Q -inn^ -ii^b biD; ia^N cni

s Sura IT. 102. \jj-« ft}\ cW f^^ y-is LfjS\ ^ ^j^ \'j\ J

' Compare the similar expresBion in Hebrew ^'HMS H-ltzJ

« Mishna Berachoth IV. 4. bbsriQ n33p Dipaa tjbnian

n-;^|7 nb5;p

* Sura XXIII. 3. y^j** ytS\ (j£ ^ y^JJ^J

Compare Eoclesiastes, v. 1. D"'l35?a ^"'I^T ITI^ ]?bv

« Sura TV. 46. ^j\^ ^^ j i\^X \^^'i
1 bbgnnb I^DM list?? Berachoth 31. 2. Erubin 64.
8 Siiras IV. 46. V. 9. »U-J^ ^■;l-...j.S Cf. Mishna Berachoth III. 4.

np bra

68 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

prayer before wasliing witli water, wHicli cleansing is
recommended as a general rule before prayer both in the
Qurl-n 1 and in the Talmud. Instead of water, purification
with sand may take place. 2 So in the Talmud : " He
cleanses himself with sand and has then done enough."
As concentrated thought is urged as a duty, it follows that
prayer though audible must not be noisy, 3 and so Muham-
mad says : " Pronounce not thy prayer aloud, neither
pronounce it with too low a voice, but follow a middle way
between these ; " and in the Talmud we find : 4 " From the
behaviour of Hannah who in prayer moved her lipa we
learn that he who prays must pronounce the words, and
also as her voice was not heard we learn that he must
not raise his voice loudly. " But because our mood does
not at all times move us to fervency of prayer, outward
ceremony is necessary, and indeed prayer in a great
congregation, whose devotion will stir up our own. ^
" The prayer in the congregation " ^ is greatly praised
also by the Jews. Daybreak, which is mentioned in the
Talmud in connection with the Shema prayer, as the time
when " one can distinguish between a blue and a white
thread, " ' is not mentioned in this connection in the

' Sura V. 8. Berachoth 46.

» 1^ Siiras IV. 46, V. 9. Cf . the Talmudio phrase

3 Sura XVII. 110. lb-1. c3Ji ^*> ^k\ / 1« ut-iVis Sj Ss^. j^ 3
* 1 Samuel, i. 13. Beraohoth 31. 2.

s Cf . Sunna 86. 87. 88. 89.

• : T • :

' Mishna Beraohoth I. 2. )5bb nbSfl ]"'3 l^'S^^Q

MAEEIAflE. 69

Quran it ia true, for tlie Quraa knows nothing of a Shema
prayer, but it appears in connection with the beginning of
the Fast Day : " ^ Until ye can discern a white thread
from a black thread by the daybreak. "

2. Some rulings in respect of women tally with Judaism ;
e.g., the waiting of divorced woman for three months before
they may marry again. 2 The time of suckling is given
in both as two years : ^ " Mothers shall give suck unto
their children two full years. " Similarly in Snra XL VI.
14 we find : " His bearing and his weaning is thirty
months, " which is explained by Blpherar as follows : ^
" He takes the shortest duration of pregnancy, viz., six
months, and the shortest of suckling, viz., twenty-four
months." Compare the Talmudic saying : 5 "A woman ia
to suckle her child two years, after that it is as though
a worm sucked. " That those relatives to whom inter-
marriage is forbidden in the Scripture are precisely those
whom Muhammad permits 6 to see their near relations
unveiled has been already noticed by Michaelis in the
Mosaic system, and he has shewn the connection between
these two laws.

1 Sura II. 183. JjIJT !=-jsJ\ y- cArf^^ '^e^^ (^ l:>«^ <j^

Compare the note in the first section (p. 26) for remarks on the Fast
Day, ' Ashura.

2 Sura II. 228. Cf . Mishna Jabhamoth IV. 10.

3 Sura II. 233. yS-S" i^f- ^oSj\ ^^^ liQiyT^
Cf. XXXI. 13.

* \fr-^ <;}}r^) ^J^ g^y^ '-^ Ji^ ; jS-A^ i;^— J<<lJ\ SX. Ji\ Jbjj
5 Kethuboth 60. 1.

Vi7.t» par? tib'^Ni ]3»3 Q"'?:^ ^!?^ r\y^ n^ n,'?"'?''?? nt»N

Compare Josephus Ant, 2. 9.
' Sura XXIV. 31.

70 JUDAISM AND ISLIm.

As Muliammad had very little intention of imposing a
new code of individual laws, since his aim was much more
tlie spread of new purified religious opinions, and as in the
matter of practice he was far too much of an Arab to
deviate from inherited usages, unless they came directly
into opposition to these higher religious views, it is easily
to be explained how so few borrowings are to be found in
this part and much even of what is adduced might perhaps
be claimed to be general oriental custom. We shall find
moreover in the Appendix that Muhammad mentions many
Jewish laws which were known to him ; he alludes to these
sometimes as binding on the Jews, sometimes merely for
the sake of disputing them, and hence we see that it was
not want of knowledge of them that kept him back from
using them, but his totally different purpose. This remark
must apply also to our third heading, under which isolated
instances of adaptation only will be found, except in cases
where the view is directly connected with the higher
articles of Faith adopted from Judaism, which have been
already mentioned.

0. Views of Life.

In putting together these single fragmentary utterances,
it is scarcely worth while to arrange them according to
any new system, and we will therefore follow the order of
the Qur^n.

Death with the righteous is to be prized, hence the
request in the Qur4n : " Make us to die with the right-
eous, " 1 which corresponds with that of Balaam, " Let me
die the death of the righteous. "

» Stira III. 191. jl^^e^ ^/
Cf. Numbers, xxiii. 10. Qnp.'' flia ''tt?93 nbn

VIEWS OF LIFE. 71

" Say not of any matter, ' I will, surely do this to-
morrow,' unless thou add, ' If God please. ' " 1 Full under-
standing is first imputed to a man when he is forty years
old, 2 and it is said in the Mishna : " At forty years of
age a man comes to intelligence. " So the hunting for
some particular persons, to whom this sentence of the
Quran shall apply, as the Arabic Commentators do, appears
altogether unnecessary ; it is also rendered very dubious
by the wide differences between the various opinions.

In the Qurdn a comparison is found between those who
bear a burden without understanding the nature of it and
who thus carry without profit, and an ass carrying books. *

" He who intercedeth (between men) with a good inter-
cession shall have a portion thereof. " * This saying is very
similar to the Hebrew one : " He who asks for mercy for
another while he needs the same thing himself obtains help

» Sura XVIII. 23. <si3^ o\__£S y\ %\ \'ji i2U3 JcU ^\ o,_-iJ yji; SI

Cf. the Hebrew expression Dt^H n!J~!'; QS
» Sura XLVI. 14, I::—. ^^.^^ gl> Cf. Abotb V. 21.

T • • T : -| I V

That fun understanding lis not reached until the completion of th©
fortieth year is observed also by Philo (e/CTj; Se [e^Bo/MaSi)
o-Ki/ecreaj? dK^nrj) , who here takes the forty-second year, only because
he attaches particular virtue to the number 7, in which Solon also agrees
with him (Vi(}. Philo, de Opificio Mundi, P. 70-72, Ed. Pfeifer I)

3 Sura LXII. 5. f^^ J*.ir JU=^

Cf. the Hebrew n>'-l50 VW'l liaq
• Sura IV. 87. Ifll. '1^ ei ^ il-Ll- lc\i_i jL-sJ y^

Cf. BabaKamma92. Wn iian ^75 D'^^ni E?i7.5'?n V?^

72 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

first. " In Sunna 689 it is said : " Three things follow the
dead, but two of them turn back ; his family, his goods,
and his works follow him ; his family and his goods
forsake him again, and only his works remain with him. "
This is also found in great detail in Kabbinical Hebrew : 1
" Man has three friends in his life time, — his family, his
property, and his good works. At the time of his depar-
ture from earth he collects the members of his family, and
says to them, ' I beg you, come and free me from this evil
death. ' They answer : ' Hast thou not heard 2 that no one
has power over the day of death.' It is also written : 3 ' None
of them can by any means redeem his brother, even his

' Pirke Rabbi Eliezer 34.

Di23a w^in dVirn yo inT.''ta5 nptpn^ Q'^niian vbsa^ i:iat5^
"'3^b''^rn. ^i^3 nsa nt»i75? onb la'si. in"-? \:5b'i rsab
ririato ^bi. 'lb V"!*?*^"! 'i'"i'i'^ r?''tp» 101 nw s-nn ty))^r\ ]a
n?.?"; n'TQ t^b n« a^n? -n? rfbi. rmr\ dV5 I'l^ib!?; yviX^.
^n'; sbi '3.t» ni'^eb bis; '•i:''« 2ns timxa iahap ^bpNi t£i"'si
Dbisb ni -13'^a bin"! m»53 I'vi? -\\T■^ nab iiM d'^ribsb
Ypb Tyb-riib ^a^ni. ^5^t»a b^ n^ani D'ibtt?b ^ib sbw
D''2?a 1? nsib smm?^ obi^jn >iTpq Q? Tyf^brj Hn>ii D'^n'o
ntz7p3S ni^i nb^b Tfb^ innitt na-in ib las'! is'iaj; n^
n?at» ^bni ia"'t£;a s^m. ''ib'^an'i n:tn nian ]p i3i3 fjaa
lawT n"'3itsn vtora D""???? ■}? •'ins n-;??? oi'^a lin b'^vi'' '^bi.
•'DJin'^prn by"! "'Si? 'ipTHjTini. n:Tn ni^n ^a '';!)b'';jni ^it^a tirp^
,ni b?aN D« '^b^ nbnin D^b ti^.l T"."tP25 nVwrr ^a nssb
la-'ipa ^:m dibt»b tibn rfbcr; i? Dibt»b ^b ib rni^iM
TjQpN.^. 'n Ti2?si Tjpn? ff'psb 'nbn"! 'w '^'■I'l^

2 Ecolesiastes, viii. 8. ^ Psalm, xlix. 8.

STORIES BORROWED FROM JUDAISM. 73

wealtb which he loves avails not, he cannot give to God a
ransom for him, for the redemption of their soul is .costly
and must be let alone for ever ; but enter thou into peace,
rest in thy lot till the end of days.l May thy part be
with the righteous.' When the ' man sees this, he collects
his treasures and says to them : ' I have laboured for you day
and night, and I pray you redeem and deliver me from this
death ' ; but they answer : ' Hast thou not heard that riches
profit not in the day of wrath ? ' 2 So then he collects his
good works and says to them : * Then you come and deliver
me from this death, support me, let me not go out of this
world, for you still have hope in me if I am delivered.'
They answer : * Enter into peace ! but before thou departest
we will hasten before thee ; as it is written, Thy
righteousness shall go before thee, the glory of the Lord
shall be thy rearward. ' " 3

Second Section.

Chapter II.

Stories borrowed from Judaism.

This division will prove to be the largest, partly, because
these narratives, draped in the most marvellous garb of
fiction, lived mostly in the mouth of the people ; partly,
because this fairy-tale form appealed to the poetic fancy of
Muhammad, and suited the childish level of his contempo-
raries. In the case of the Old Testament narratives, which
are seldom related soberly, but are for the most part
embellished, it needs scarcely a question, or the most
cursory enquiry, as to whether or no they have passed from
the .Jews to Muhammad ; for the Christians, the only
other possible source to which they could be attributed,
bestowed very little attention in those days on the Old
Testament, but in their narratives kept to what is strictly

* Daniel, xii. 13. ' Proverbs, xi. 4. 3 isaiah, Iviii, 8.

74 JUDAI3M AND ISLAM.

Christian, viz., the events of the Life of Jesus, of His
disciples and His followers, and of the multitude of subse-
quent Saints and wonder-workers, which afforded them
abundant material for manifold embellishments. The
Christians, for all that they accepted the Old Testament
as a sacred writing, and although in those days no doubt
had arisen as to whether or no they were to put the Old
Testament on a level with the New in respect of holiness
and divine inspiration, a doubt which has been brought
forward for example by Schleiermacher in later times, — the
Christians of that period, I say, had nevertheless a more
lively interest in the New Testament, since it was the
expression of their separation and independence. The
Old Testament was common to them and the Jews, and
indeed they could not deny to the latter a greater right of
possession in it, for the Jews possessed it entirely, and were
versed in it even to the minutest details, an intimate
knowledge with which we cannot credit the Christians.
Further, just those points in the Old Testament which were
specially suited to the Christian teaching are found to be
scarcely touched upon in the Quran ; thus, for instance, the
narrative of the transgression of the first human pair is not
at all represented as a fall into sin, involving the entire
corruption of human nature which must afterwards be
redeemed, but rather Muhammad contents himself with the
plain, simple narration of the fact. This may be taken as
an instance to prove that the narratives about persons
mentioned in the Old Testament are almost all of Jewish
origin, and this will be more clearly shewn when we come
to details.

As we proceed to the enumeration of the individual
borrowed stories, the necessity is forced upon us of arrang-
ing them in some order. We have no reason for arranging
them according to their sources, (Bible, Mishna, Gemara,
Midrash, etc.) as Muhammad did not gain his knowledge of
these narratives from any of these sources, but was taught

PATEIAKCHS : FKOM ADAM TO NOAH. lb

them all verbally by those round him, and so they were all
of the same value for him, and were all called biblical ;
furthermore we must pay no attention to their contents,
for the narratives are not given as supporting any
doctrines of Islam, but are merely quoted as records of
historical facts ; and even in those cases where they are
intended to set forth a doctrine, it is almost always
either that of the unity of God, or that of the Eesur-
rection of the dead. It appears therefore advisable to
arrange them chronologically, by which means it will be
most easy to recognize the numerous anachronisms among
them. Either Muhammad did not know the history of
the .Jewish nation, which is very probable, or the n§,rration
of it did not suit his object, for only once is the
whole history summed up in brief,l and only the events
in the lives of a few persons are mentioned. In this
chronological arrangement we shall have to pay more
attention to the personal importance of individuals than to
any changes in the condition and circumstances of the
nation, and thus in this arrangement we shall have the
following Divisions : 1. Patriarchs; 2. Moses j 3. The three
Kings who reigned over the individed Kingdom, viz., Saul,
David and Solomon ; and 4. Holy men who lived after them.

Second Chapter.
First Part.
Patriarchs : A. — From Adam, to Noah.
The great event of the creation of the first man gave
occasion for much poetical embellishment. Before the
appearance of Adam, the jealousy of the angels, who had
counselled against his creation, was roused, and God shamed
them by endowing Adam more richly with knowledge than
any of them. In the Quran we have the following des-
cription :2\" When thy Lord said unto the angels, ' I am

• Siira XVII, 4-8. " Sura II. 28-32.

76 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

going to place a substitute on earth' ; they said, 'Wilt thou
place there one who will do evil therein and shed blood ?
but we celebrate thy praise and sanctify thee.' God
answered : ' Verily I know that which ye know not '; and He
taught Adam the names of all things, and then proposed
them to the angels, and said : ' Declare unto me the names
of these things, if ye say truth.' They answered : ' Praise
be unto thee, we have no knowledge but what thou
teachest us, for thou art knowing and wise.' God said :
' 0 Adam, tell them their names ; ' and when he had told
them their names, God said : ' Did I not tell you that I know
the secrets of heaven and earth, and know that which ye
discover, and that which ye conceal ? ' " The corresponding
Hebrew passage may be thus translated : l " When the
Holy One, blessed be He ! would create man, he took
counsel with the angels, and said to them : ' We will make
man in our image ; ' 2 tl^eQ ^}^qj g^id : ' What is man that
thou art mindful of him ? 3 What will be his peculiarity ? '
He said: 'His wisdom is greater than yours.' Then He
brought beasts, cattle, and birds before them, and asked for
their names, but they knew them not. But when He had

1 Midrash Kabbah on Numbers, para. 19.

vydh ma^ 1310^22 diss nJ??3 ]nb -las n-^wn \?b?'?a?
inapn ^nb las 'lata na nr nis ^3-i.?Tn '^s trJ'isi;! na
n^l'n^nrj nsi nan?n ntJi QrJ^^?b s'^an D^bt^a nan!?
d7^ s-;3t» 713 rVT' ''"'7 ^^l '""25? "9 ^l '^ V ni^n
nian nt nitr ni nas \m na n?. ib law v:?^ r;???:T
snj^nb ns2 ''2« ib las ^m ng njps^ ba^ n.n dto nr
ns: Tjb 'b 's laaj-na '^js^i naisin ^a \ns-!53t» Diw
'r|''ni''-!3 bab liis nriy?? ^;is n^ni^n^

Compare Midrash Kabbah on Genesis, para. 8 and 17, and also
Sanhediin 38.
' Genesis, i. 26. ^ Psalm, viii. 5.

ADAM AND THE ANGELS. 77

created man He caused tte animals to pass before him and
asked him for their nameSj and he replied : ' This is an ox,
that an ass, this a horse and that a camel/ ' But what art
thou called ? ' ' It is fitting that I should be called earthy,
for I am formed of the earth.' ' And I ? ' ' Thou art called
LoED, for thou rulest all Thy creatures.' "jFrom this arose
the other legend l that God, after the creation of man,
commanded the angels to fall down before him, which they
all did except Iblis,^ the devil. The legend bears
unmistakeable marks of Christian development, in that
Adam is represented in the beginning as the God-man,
worthy of adoration, which the Jews are far from
asserting.^ It is true that in Jewish writings great
honour is spoken of as shewn by the angels to Adam,
but this never went so far as adoration ; indeed when
this was once about to take place in error, God frustrated
the action. We find in Sanhedrin 29,4 " Adam sat in
the Garden of Eden, and the angels roasted flesh for him,
and prepared cooling wine "; and in another passage it
is said,5 " After God had created man, the angels went
astray in regard to him, and wanted to say before him.

* Suras Vir. 10-18, XV. 28-44, XVII. 63-68, XVIII. 48, XX. 115,
XXXVIII. 7i-86.

J o

U-«l5^ Oia/SoXo9.

- a

^ The legend of the devil's refusal to worship Adam, given by me as
a Christiaa one, was found by Zunz (" Die Gottesdienstlichen Vof
trage der Juden," page 291. Note.) in the MS. Midrash of Kabbi Moses
Haddarshan. who however lived in the'eleventh century.

* mwTi "'ps^a ^""ni n:^ri 775 12? 2pa ^itt's-in nis

]^^. lb ]''232s:n iba ib y^vi

* Midcash Uabbah on Genesis, para. 8.

••Dsbn in wq o-jwrr n^? s^n "n^na triij^n s-jatr nrtr;^
h-^Ti 'n '-> 'rn r^bv na triip VDsb -ibsb nBfp>i rntt>n
CIS s^n© bsn ^j?t,1 ns:--Tiri rba

78 JUDAISM AND ISLIm.

0 Holy one ! then God permitted sleep to fall on him, and
all knew that he was of earth." In favour of the Christian
origin of this narrative we must count the fact that the
name used by Christians for the devil is the one used in
all the passages referred to instead of the general Hebrew
name.l From this event according to Muhammad arises
the hatred of the Devil against the human race, because
on their account he became accursed of God ; and so his
first work was to counsel man in the Garden of Eden 2 to
eat of the tree of knowledge.^ In this narrative the
Devil is again given his Hebrew name,* and yet the first
explanation of the temptation through the snake as coming
from the Devil seems to be entirely Christian, as no such
reference is to be found in the older Jewish writings ; the
passage quoted below can only be regarded as a slight
allusion : ^ " From the beginning of the book up to this
point 6 no Samech is to be found ; as soon however as
woman is created, Satan (with the initial letter Sin w like
Samech d) is created also." Still we find in a book which,
though forged, is undoubtedly old,7 the following statement:
!__

' J-rA?^ (Sta/3o\o?) instead of ytL-lf^ (^tti»)

' This proper name is never used by Muhammad in this narrative ;
ft* -
he uses throughout simply 6j^, which shows that the Jews knew well the

distinction between the home of our first parents and Paradise.
' Siiras Vir. 18-25, XX. 115-127.

' Midrash Babbah on Genesis, para. 17.

T • ' T T

6 Genesis, ii. 21. nSD'l
' Pirke Rabbi Eliezer, xiii.

TT^I "i^t» nsn n?:? np;b t3^a£»at» bnan I'wn bwao rf)n
n^n N^S) ^5bi Kin rj-i-i^ wiipn s-;3t» ni^-i^n bs ns>-;"i

THE FALL OF MAN. 79

" Samael, tbe great prince in heaven, took his companions
and went down and inspected all God's creatures ; he
found none more maliciously wise than the serpent, so he
mounted it, and all that it said or did was at the instiga-
tion of Samael. " l Thus this legend, even if not entirely
Jewish, appears to have been derived by Muhammad from
the .Jews. In the details of this narrative some confusion
is found between the tree of knowledge and the tree
of life. The former only is mentioned in Scripture as
prohibited by Grod,2 and to the eating of that alone the
serpent incites Eve. After the transgression has taken
place, we find the fear mentioned lest men should eat of
the tree of life and live for ever.3 Muhammad confuses
the two. In one passage he puts into the devil's mouth
the statement that men through eating of this tree would
become " Angels," or " immortal," 4 but in another
passage he mentions only the tree of eternity .5 All the
rest of the history of the first human pair is omitted, and

rfb"! -I?.-? sb n-z^w ina? bai. I'^bsr 35-51. nbr EJnsa snnb

bsoD ba; inv'^ra wbs nbv

■• T - V : - • TV T T

' To the same effect Muhammad ben Kais (vide Elpherar on Til. 21) :

* ,j-Jj\ i_s>j-*^ J^ W/*^ (^ isaAi J^ A««J\ i^f^ ^^ itX*iiA ^ \^

" His Lord called to him : ' 0 Adam, why hast thou eaten of that, when
I had forbidden it to thee ?' He replied, ' Lord, Eve gave it tome.' Then
said He to Eve : ' Why didat thou give it to him ?' she replied, ' The snake
commanded me to do it.' Then said He to the snake : ' Why didat thou
command it f ' The devil ordered me to do it.' "

See also Abulfedae Historia Anteislamica, Fleischer's edition, page 12.

« Genesis, ii. 17, and iii. 5. (V^) ^itt \3?7i"' DVbsS Di'1''':n'l)

' Genesis, iii. 22. obivb ""nj

♦ Sura VII. 19. yVili or j^jj^\ (j^

' Sura XX. 118. JJ^\ Ca^'

80 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

only one event in tlie life of Cain and Abel is depicted.
This is depicted for us quite in its Jewisli colours. In this
passage, and indeed throughout the Quran, they are called
sons of Adam, but in later Arabic writings 1 their names
are given as Qabil and Habil, which are clearly chosen out
of love for the rhyming sounds. The one event mentioned is
their sacrifice and the murder which it led to.2 Muhammad
makes them hold a conversation before the murder, and
one is likewise given in the Jerusalem Targum 3 on the
strength of the words in Genesis, " Cain said unto Abel
his brother." Still, the matter of the conversation is
given so differently in each case that we do not consider
it worth while to compare the two passages more closely.
After the murder, according to the Qur£n, God sent a
raven which scratched the earth to shew Cain how to bury
Abel. What is here attributed to Cain is ascribed by the
Jews to his parents, and m a Rabbinical writing we find
the following passage : * V Adam and his companion sat
weeping and mourning for him (Abel) and did not know
what to do with him, as burial was unknown to them.
Then came a raven, whose companion was dead, took its

' See Abalfeda Historia Anteialamioa, Fleischer's Edition, page 12, for
Ai>\Ji , J.-jVi. D'Herbelot Bibliotheque Orientale under the heading
Cabil calls attention to the poaaibility that in the word Cabil the
derivation from ^j^ is kept to. Cf . Genesis, iv. 1.

» Genesis, iv. 3-9. Cf. Sura V. 30—36.

' Commonly called Pseudo-Jonathan.

* Pirke R. Eliezer, chapter xxi.

-vn t^bi vby D"ibaNna-i □"'aisi D^:im> inrs^i qin -vn

T : T T • : - : • • ■ ; ; v : t t t

n:ot2fl V"!*?? ""Ss^"! 'i'^'i^ npb v-rana iqs ib nac? iqw
bt» inb?: nj^b i»a nwv "<;« 2-1^3 cin -law Qn"':''?b

HDaM v^a ism ban

T T : » VT T - T ;

CAIN AND ABEL. 8t

body, scratched in the earth and hid it before their eyes ;
then said Adam, I shall do as this raven has done, and at
once he took Abel's corpse, dug in the earth and hid it."
In the Qur^n a verse follows 1 which, without knowledge
of the source from which it has come, seems to stand
in no connection with what has gone before, but which
will be made clear by the following explanation. The
verse according to my translation runs thus : " Wherefore
we commanded the children of Israel, that he who slayeth
a soul, without having slain a soul, or committed wicked-
ness in the earth, shall be as if he had slain all mankind ;
but he who saveth a soul alive, shall be as if he had saved
the lives of all mankind." One perceives here no connec-
tion at all, if one does not consider the following Hebrew
passage : 2 " VVe find it said in the case of Cain who
murdered his brother : The voice of thy brother's bloods
crieth.3 It is not said here blood in the singular, but
bloods in the plural, i.e., his own blood and the blood of
his seed. Man was created single in order to show that
to him who kills a single individual, it shall be reckoned
that he has slain the whole race ; but to him who preserves
the liEe of a single individual it is counted that he hath
preserved the whole race." By this comparison it is made
clear what led Muhammad to this general digression ; he
had evidently received this rule from his informants when
they related to him this particular event. Another

' Sura V. 35. ' Mishna Sanhedrin IV. 5.

D"'ps2 Tfn^ '■'■ai bip ia nay?, vrrs m rrnw ^.P? ^V2Ki

bs-ib»p nns m???. las^in bsjp TTiabb ■'Trf. q-jn m-i??

tt7M D^i^an b5i sba obiy ^SM ^bs? nwsn Ybv nbso

sba d^is n?.n >ibsi? a-insn r'bv nbsa bsi-).t?»»a no«

' Genesis, iv. 10, not Q1 (siDgular), but "'a'1 (plural). Compare the
translation of Oukelos.
li

82 JUDAISM Mm ISLAM.

allusion to Cain is found in the Qurin in a passage where
he is called the man " who has seduced among men." 1 No
one else is mentioned in this period excepting Idrls 2 who,
according to the commentators, is Enoch. This seems
probable from the words,^ " And we uplifted him to a
place on high," and also from a Jewish writing in which
he is counted among the nine who went to Paradise alive.
Jalalu'ddin brings this point even more prominently
forward : 4 " He lived in Paradise where he had been
brought after he had tasted death ; he was quickened
however, and departed not thence again." He appears to
have gained his name ^ on account of the knowledge of the
Divine Law attributed to him. Elpherar remarks : " He
was called Idris (searcher) on account of his earnest
search in the revealed Scriptures." It is remarkable that
in both these passages of the Qurdn^ he is mentioned
after Ishmael.

' Siira XLI. 92. (j^iffi^ Ji\ ^jJT

2 Jm5jj\ Suras XIX. 57, 58 ; XXI, 85, 86.

■" s

Elpherar on Sura XIX. 57 says : t)^ "' '^ j C)» i^^ -^ t^j

" He is the grandfather of the father of Noah, his name is Enoch ;"
which name Abulfeda (-Hist. Anteislamioa page 14) spells ^^is. and

expressly remarks : &*«,*- oU ^ j\j ; (jy j SX*^ oVasj " With an unpointed

ha, nnn, waw, and a pointed ha;" and later he adds (j««»)j\ ub. Cr^ ^^ i

a - = _ , _c

' Sura XIX. 58. Ulc U\X.. sUsu,^. Compare Genesis, v. 24 and the

Tract Dereoh Erez cited in Midrash Yalknt, chap. XLII.

* InMaraocio, j_3s=>\^ '.iJ^\ tjjj^ y\ Jkso laLij\ &i^\|_ji ^^i^ Ji

W B;^ (^;

S y«jjO\ is derived from ,j-,j Elpherar on XIX. 57. (j~>i4>\ « ,.

« Suras XIX. 55, 56 ; XXI. 85.

FEOM NOAH TO ABEAHAM. 83

B.—From Noah to Abraham.

The corruption vchicli' spread in the time of Noah is not
described with any details in the Quran, and one event
which is stated by the Rabbis to have taken place at this
period is transferred by Muhammad to Solomon's time,
to which he considered it better suited, as it treats of
angels and genii. The Rabbinical passage runs thus : ^
" Rabbi Joseph was asked by his scholars : ' What is Azael ? '
and he answered : When men at the time of the Flood
practised idolatry, God was grieved at it, and two angels,
Shamhazai and Azael, said to him : ' Lord of the world, did

' Midr. Ablikhir quoted in Midr. Yalknt Chap. XLIV.

^lartr 113 Dnb las bwy ^na no'i"' 2"^ris vi^abn ^bwcB

: T V 't- V t "t "t-; - ••• - v t • : - -: t

3!jrna -i-in Ti^naDiipn Ti^r[ mt m'lar •■nn's?"! b^aan -n>
■"laian vasb •■naw"! bNti?i nnaa? D'^ONba •^atr ^lai? i»a
toias na ^rabii; riK nn-istt's ^^3Qb :i3naM i^bn nbi:? bt»

T V T V T TT V : ' vT : :-T -: j t

: T T T •• ; - T : v t - t •■•::■

I. ; ._. - . _^._ -r; -r T T II.;-;. .T

' b ' N Di« "'saa ctrp □n-'V-n rin -is^i naa iDbtr n''H v-i'n-s.

TT •• : • ■ 't -.••:• TT V" V T " T T * V T T

Tfap T'tr'^pa ^3W 'n'-w nw-ini. ninan nv Tnai. n-itDi. ^2b in
rracj^ nnw nan nnat» hnt i^a cnaa •nmm ^ti ' b ' s

t: -- T*--;;- tt-- vt- t: :

nsato" ''i-'N ib niaH '^b •'sattJn saw na i^2^5J ina nneoN

-- ... t;t ■ 'IT- -t t t"'-t -;:•

n5?t»3 s^T-ib '"la nbr nnsaj to^ba Qt»n •'2nabnt» ir Ttb

t T : - (. TT V T - V T ; •• - •••:-;■.■ - '

"S^irf^ rrnbvi ct» iniw n-i^sTn uw inis mab ^mar nris©
n-iarn ia nass nt»-ien Vsin 'n 'a 'pn -law nbpbp t^b''

t---;t'* t;- t:-' • t 't~ ~t t';;!- :

Dbisb na ^aw??' ''I? ^bbn n-'aaia nratp ra n^rap") nab
sbi n'lD'' -vntt? msn niaa dv -ibpbp T^a na'^aa ni?ap3"i

; T TV TTT ; ■ '::'• ~* T'~ T;';;

s-in n-'ja ^T^bim g^wi nsccai niai? pi*^ riN tciaab sbai

T • ■ T '. : • T : T ; : r ■ t : • •.• ; - ; t

bc7 7"'t2"'t»an ''^'^a bi?! Q''3i57a5S --^^a by n-n bstri s^m

I . . ; - ... - ; . ; . ... - -f T •- T"; ' T ■ ;

Compare Yoma 67, 2. and Kashi, Zohar on Genesis, i. 26.

84 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

we not say unto Thee at tlie creation : ' What is man that
Thou art mindful of him ? ' i But He said: ' What shall
become of the world ? ' They answered : ' We would have
made use of it.' ' But it is well-known to Me that, if you
lived on the earth, lust would overcome you, and you would
become even worse than man.' ' Then give us permission
to live with men, and Thou wilt see how we shall sanctify
Thy name.' ' Go and live with them.' Then Shamhazai
saw a maiden by name Istahar. He cast his eyes on her
and said : ' Listen to me ; ' to which she replied : ' I will not
listen to thee until thou teachest me the explicit name
of God, through the mention of which thou risest to
heaven.' He taught her this name which she then uttered
and rose unspotted to heaven. Then God said : ' Because
she turned herself from sin, well! fasten her between
the seven stars, that ye may enjoy her for ever ' ; and so
she was fastened into the Pleiades. But they lived in
immorality with the daughters of men, for these wore
beautiful, and they could not tame their lusts. Then they
took wives and begat sons, Hiwwa and Hiyya. Azael was
master of the meritricious arts and trinkets of women
which beguile men to immoral thoughts." It is evident
that this story is alluded to in the passage in the Quran,2
where the two angels Hardt and Mdrnt are said to have
taught men a charm by which they might cause division
between a man and his wife.3 During this state of

• Psalm, viii. 5.

' Siira II. 96. ^^^^ j ci^jjVa

' This connection and comparison whioli might well appear very doubt-
ful, and which seemed even to me at first nothing more than a conjecture,
receives full corroboration from that which later Arabian authors, quite
in harmony with the Mid. Talkut, say about the ftngels. We find in
Maraooius Prodromi iv, 82, the following :

JUi J-,j3\ ^8»"»W Juij r-^^ tr* r»^ (:>- ^"^^ «'-^** '«'V* J^Ji )
uy^jU J isjjjU UUCi y4jS\ ^ yUXisJ y*4y\ t>«-^'^ f^"^ \;jta.\ ^jjj ^

FKOM NOAH TO ABRAHAM. OO

corruption o£ morals Noah appears, teacliing men and
seeking by exhortation to turn them from their evil
ways. He builds himself the Ark and is saved, while the rest
of the people perish. l His whole appearance as an admon-
isher and seer is not Biblical but Eabbinioal, and serves
Muhammad's ends perfectly, as Noah in this way is a type
of himself. According to rabbinical writings, 2 Job, xii. 5
refers to Noah, " who rebuked them and spake to them
words as severe as flames, but they scorned him and said :
' Old man, for what purpose is this ark ?' He, however, said:
' God is going to bring a flood upon you.' " Other particulars

UjuiVi W^53 z*^^^ i\j^\ 6)*^ (j» (;>*-=^^ V^y^ ^StA^ ct^K* (T^^ 3iX« \_4is^

>V.».a.-'» Jii ts^j^ci-js. u:.Ji=.y SjJJ>j!\ uiJjUaJ \^ — ai |_jLc \j\j\ . ^j

* LjjJ\ Jii\ (j^ ij:^\i \^ Uisi\ ,_jsj\ ti\j*i\ (^\ Jjfci.ay» j-£ f^ j_jj.aj jij jCi.

" Mujahid says : The angels wondered at the wickedness of the sons
of Adam, for Apostles had already been sent to them ; then their Lord
(God) said to them : ' Choose out two of you, and I will send them that
they may judge upon earth.' Then Earut and Marut were chosen, and
they judged righteously, till Zahrah (the star Venus, just like the
Talkutish "intaDW. like "li^DN the Persian »)^ and the Greek
darrjp) , In Job xxxi. 26 the Targum puts nPiriDN for the Hebrew lis)
came in the form of a most beautiful woman and complained abont her
husband. They were led astray by her and lusted after her, but she fled
and went back to where she was before .... Muhammad says : ' Tahya
states on another authority than that of Mujahid, that the woman through
whom they were led astray was a human woman.' The union of these
two views is to be found in the passages quoted from Midrash Yalkut.

' Suras VII. 57—63, X. 72—75, XT. 27—60, XXII. 43, XXIII. 23—82.
XXV. 39, XXVI. 105-121, XXIX. 13. 14, XXXVII. 73-81, LIV. 9—18,
LXXI. 1— end.

' Sanhedrin 108. (Comp. Midrash Eabbah on Genesis, paras. 80 and
83, also on Ecclesiastes, ix. 14.)

D>i^Qb3 D^tpi7 Qna-:? nnb -iomi Dni« n^-pia p'^•^_^^r\ nb n;nt»
' i?rt cnb -las nab it nn>n ]pT ib -iian '"iniM p-t^a ^•'rn

biaan ni^ DD^b? N'<2ia 'n 'a

86 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

also accord with Rabbinical tradition, e.g., " The people
laughed at the ark," l accords with " They mocked and
laughed at him in their words." " The waters of the
Flood were hot," 2 with " The generation of the deluge
was punished with hot water." Still many inaccuracies
and perversions are to be found j for instance, Muhammad
makes Noah to have lived 950 years before the Flood,^
whereas this is really the whole term of his life j and he
represents one of Noah's sons as disobedient to him,
and states that this same son did not follow him into the
Ark, but believed himself safe on a mountain peak.4 This
idea probably arose from a misunderstanding of Ham's
evil conduct after the Deluge. ^ Muhammad also makes
out Noah's wife to have been unbelieving, ^ although he
is silent as to wherein her unbelief consisted ; and I can
find no reason for this statement, which is not men-
tioned either in the Bible or in the Eabbinical writings.

1 Sura XI. 40 Cf. Midr. Tanohuma, Section Noah.

* Sura Xr. 42. and XXIII. 27. j^ jCi^

Cf. Rosh Haahanah 16. 2. and Sanhedrin 108,

The Arabic Commentators seem to me to have quite misunderstood
these paaaages, since they assume fabulous references. Our explanation,
which is jnatified by a, figurative interpretation of the words ' And the
oven glows,' appears to me sufficiently confirmed by a comparison with
the Talmudic utterance. Also D'Herbelot (Bib. Orient. Noah, page 671,)
understands ,4j;ja\,U. in this way.

3 Sura XXIX. 13. Cf, Genesis, ix, 29.

* Sura XI. 44, 45, 48.
5 Genesis, ix. 22 ff.

The commentators actually call this son Canaan, m^**^ (compare
Genesis, ix. 25 ff ) although they, like the Bible, do not reckon any son
of this name in their enumeration of the sons, but count these three
only, viz, li-^i^. f*^ > (*^

* Sura LX VI, 10.

reOM NOAH TO ABBAIJAM. 87

•

Perhaps Muhammad was misled by the analogy of the
wife of Lot, who is mentioned in the same context. While
these variations are due to errors and to the confusion cf
different times and events, others are to be ascribed to
deliberate^ alteration and elaboration. And of this kind
are those details not mentioned in Jewish History, which
represent Noah as one occupying the same position as
Muhammad and speaking in his spirit. This applies partic-
ularly to that which is put into his mouth as admonisher.
This is the case not only with Noah, but with all who
appear in the character of the righteous in any evil age.
Thus he puts into the mouth of Luqm^n, as a wise man
known to the Arabs,2 words suitable to his own circum-
stances and opinions, and the same thing happens in the
case of Noah and the other preachers of Jewish history
to whom he alludes. Noah although he worked no miracle,
was saved in a miraculous way, and so Muhammad cannot
put into his mouth the same words which houses of himself,
as well as ascribes to other forerunners of himself after
Noah's time, viz., that he is a mere preacher ; yet he makes
him say everything which is not clearly contrary to the
historical facts related about him. He was only an unim-
portant man,3and did not pretend to be any one wonderful
or supernatural.4 But he was divinely commissioned to
warn the people, and for this he asked no reward. 5 0
sancta simplicitas ! one would exclaim in considering this
last point, if Muhammad had written it down with full
consideration of Noah's position as one threatening the
world with punishment, and if it had not been rather
that he saw everything from his own distorted point of

' The word "deliberate" is to be understood in the sense already
sufficiently explained in the First Division, Third Section, so that we may
use it from now on without further explanatory comment.

» Siira, XXXI. 11 ff. 3 gura VII. 61. « Sura XI. 33.

* Sura XI. 31. and XXVI, 109.

88 JUDAISM AND ISLIm.

view, and was determined to make every thing accord with
his ideas. In another place he goes so far as to interpolate
a verse into Noah's discourse, which is entirely character-
istic of his own, and in which the little word (translated
"speak")! actually occurs, which is always regarded
as a word of address to Muhammad from God (or Gabriel).
The same thing will be noted further on in the case of
Abraham.

After Noah the next mentioned is Hud 2 who is evidently
the Biblical Eber.3 This seems a striking example of the
ignorance of Muhammad, or, as it appears to me more
probable here, of the Jews round about him. According
to the Eabbinical opinion 4 the name Hebrew is derived
from Eber, but in later times this name was almost
entirely forgotten and the name Jew 5 -was commonly used.
The Jews, to whom it was known that their name was
derived from an ancestor, believed that the name in
question was that in use at the time, and that the ancestor
therefore was this patriarch Hud. 6 His time is that in
which a second punitive judgment from God on account
of bold, insolent behaviour is mentioned in the Scripture,

» ji XI. 37. Of. XXIX. 19' 2 oys

3 -153; « >-l5r from -)53

Compare Mid. Kabbah on Genesis, para. 42.

" Abram was called the Hebrew because he was descended from fiber."
(Genesis, xiv. 13.).
J >-^!in'< Yahtidi. Among the Arabs sometimes J^ Tahud, more

often oyfc Hud.

s Blpherar (on Sura VII. 63) gives along with an incorrect genealogy
the following correct one, jy j^ *L. ^^ xSu£^j\ ^^ jJL, ^^^ and
the author of the book ^_sJ^\ f>ic\ says directly " Hud is yW."

(Mar. Prod. iv. 92.)

TOWEE or BABEL.

and this is treated of in several chapters of the Quran. l
In order to have the right to refer what is said about Hud
to the time of the confusion of tongues, or, as the Eabbis
call it, the Dispersion,^ we must adduce some particulars
which point to this reference, for the statements are very
general in their tenour and might be referred to other
occurrences. The following verse ^ possibly refers to the
building of the Tower : " And ye erect magnificent works,
hoping that ye may continue for ever." The Arabic com-
mentators take it that the buildings would afford them a
perpetual dwelling-place, but the verse might also mean,
" make by building it an everlasting name for yourselves."
The neighbourhood is called in the Qur£n the " Possessor
of Pillars.4 In one passage^ there appears to be a reference
to Nimrod, who lived at this time and in this region, since
the children of Ad are here reproached for obeying the
command of every contumacious hero.^ The idea that
they were idolaters, which is brought up against them in
all the passages in the Quran, agrees perfectly with the
Eabbinical view expressed as follows : ^ " And it came to

* Suras YII. 63—71, XI. 52—64, XXII. 43, XXIII. 33—44, XXV. 40,
XXVI. 123— 141, XXIX. 37, XXXVIII. 11, XL. 32, XLI. 12-16, XLVI.
20—26, L. 13, LI, 41, 42, LIII. 50, LIV. 18—22, LXIX, 4 -9, LXXXIX.
6—9.

TT : -
3 Sura XXVI. 129. yjji&J ^^^ g>\^ (j^^^ j

* Sura LXXXIX. 6. jU«3\ ■^\'c> Cf. Genesis xi. 4.

* Sura XL 62. JuJiCjCi J^ ^'^ '^f^'i

Compare Genesis, x. 8, 9, where Nimrod's surname is always "1123

* D'Herbelot, under the heading Nimrod, asserts that the Arabians
connect Nimrod with the building of the Tower.

' Midr. Rabbah on Genesis, xi. 2, par, 38.
M

90 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

pass when they journeyed from the beginning (East),
that is to say, when they withdrew themselves from Him
Who is the beginning of the world." Muhammad says
of these people ^ that they built an (idolatrous) symbol on
every high place in order to play there (i.e. to practice
idolatry). And the Rabbis tell us 2 that the race of the
dispersion contemplated building a tower and putting an
idol on its summit. Resemblances are also to be found
with reference to the punishment which overtook them.
Muhammad tells us 3 they were followed in this world by a
curse, and that they shall be followed by the same on the
day of resurrection, and the Rabbis say 4 that the race
of the dispersion had no part in the next world, for the
twice-mentioned dispersion applies to this world and the
other. In Muhammad's treatment the essential point of
the punishment is lost sight of, for instead of describing
it as a simple dispersion and confusion of tongues, he
speaks of an absolute annihilation of the sinners by a
poisonous wind.5 One sees at once the mistaken source
from which this change is derived. We recognize partly
from our knowledge of Muhammad's motives in making
the alteration, and partly from the minuteness with which

1 Sura XXVI, 128. y^^^ %^ g»j Jio yy^"f Compare pHSb.
to play, Exodus, xxxii. 6,

ia7M'-i2 mr

: TT

' Siira XI. 63, fciUiiST ^y'^ £«! Ujji! ili ^_^ ^f^^')

* Mishna Sanhedrin X. 3. Genesis, xi. 8, 9.

Tiin nbisa cnis 'n v?*! Vl^n-bj ■'3Q bp ct^is Dnis

N3n Dbirs 'n □^"'sn nt»a^

* Suras XLI. 16, XLVI. 23 ff. LI. 41, LIV. 19, LXIX. 6 11.

TOWEE OF BABEL. 91

the new punishment is described, which would not have
been accorded to a fiction. It appears therefore that the
history reached this development in the mouth of tho
people, who delight in minute descriptions of punishment.
The remaining deviations and additions, particularly the
latter, are caused, as we have already remarked in the case
of Noah, by confusion with Muhammad's own time and
person. This is the case when he transfers unbelief in
the resurrection to the time of Hnd and counts it among
the sins of that time which were worthy of punishment, l
This is seen too especially in the great importance assigned
to Eber and to his desire to turn the people from their evil
ways. Decided traces of this are certainly to be found in
Jewish writings,^ where we are told that Eber was a great
prophet, who by the Holy Spirit called his son Pelag,
because in his days the earth was divided 3 (which Eber
had known beforehand). Much also is said of the school
of Eber, and Eebekah is said to have gone there j for
it is written : " She went to enquire of the Lord," ■! and
Jacob is supposed to have stayed there for fourteen years.
But of the fact that Eber preached to the people, he being
their brother (on which Muhammad places great stress,
because he himself was sent as an Arab to the Arabs) ,
not a trace is to be found, still less of the fact that he took
no reward from them.5 One point still remains to be
cleared up, why the race under discussion is called in the

> Sura XXIII, 87.

' Seder 'Olam quoted in Midrash Yalkut, Chap. 62.

ajipn n^-l^2 abe 122 DE^-ns vnnw inv n^n biia n^33

P._. - -.- V : ■■ V T'tV V" TT T -T

VT?^? ™V9? "'"'o;? ^3 'iw

' Genesis, x. 26.

* Genesis, xxv. 22. Midr. Kabbah on Genesis, par. 63. Also par. 68. for
Jacob's sojonrn in the home of Eber.

* Sura XI, 63, XXVI. 127,

92 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

Qur&n the people of Ad.^ The commentatorB state that Ad
was the son of Uz, the son of Aram, the son of Shem, the
son of Noah ; and Muhammad seems also to have been of
this opinion, whence it comes that he transfers the events
to the land of Aram or Iram.2 Nevertheless it seems to
have come about chiefly from the fact that all these occur-
rences are described with an Arabian colouring, and so
they were attributed to Arab tribes, amongst which an
ancient extinct one had the name of Ad ; 3 perhaps in it
there is also an etymological reference to a " return" to
the early evil conduct of the generation of the Deluge. In
another passage there is an allusion to this occurrence,*
where the fact itself is brought forward much more in
accordance with the Biblical account, but quite without
specification of time or persons : " Their predecessors
devised plots heretofore, but God came into their building
to overthrow it from the foundation, and the roof fell on
them from above and a punishment came upon them which
they did not expect." On this Blpherar remarks : 5 " These
are Nimrod, the son of Canaan, who built a tower in Babel
in order that he might mount to heaven" ; and further :
" And when the tower fell the language of men became
confused, and so they could not finish it ; then they spoke
seventy-three languages, on this account the city was
called Babel (confusion), before this the language of men
was Syriac." The Eabbis, too, assert that before this

2 Sui'a LXXXIX. 6, ^^

a
' Poc. Spec, p. 3,

♦ Sura XVI. 28.

' oU i\ ^J\ •J*-aJ J^Wj C;-=i^ tS^ y^**^ tH •^))*^ f**;

y^Otf.^. ^'IXij \j»Kr> iS^ji ^yi!\ (^ ^J^i\^^ (J^ CiJJLjJ Cj J\ Sao- U3 f

TOWEE OF BABBL. 93

men spoke in Hebrew, but afterwards in seventy languages.
Jalalu'd-din says the same thing,l and adds that Nimrod
built the Tower " in order that he might mount out of it
into heaven to wage war with the inhabitants thereof." 2
But the identity of this narrative with that of Hnd and Ad
is no more accepted by Abulf eda 3 than it is by Elpherar
and Jalfi,lu'd-din, even on the view that Hud is the same
as Eber. Although the colouring of this narrative as
given in the Qurin differs much from that of the
Biblical account, yet the identity of the two can be
shown by putting this and that together, and by ex-
plaining the way in which the individual differences
arose. But in the case of another narrative which
follows this one in almost all the passages of the Qurdn,*
it is very diflBcult to find out the subject of which it treats
and the Bible characters to which it refers. This narrative
is about Samud,^ which like Ad is an ancient extinct Arab
tribe,6 to whom their brother Salih was sent when they fell
into sin.'' Salih is said to have exhorted the Samndites
to righteousness and to have commended to them a
certain she-camel as especially under divine protection ;

I Maraco. on the passage.

* \^\ JjUJ !.U--J\ fj\ /Um J*-»s3

^ Hist. Anteial4mica, pp. 18 and 20.

* Except in Suras L. 12, and LXIX. 4, where it precedes. In the former
of these two passages it precedes the story of the Midianites also, and
thus no chronological order is followed. In Suras LI. 43 and LIII. 51, it
actaally precedes the story of the Deluge, and in Sura LXXXV. 18,
Pharoah is placed before Samud on account of the rhyme,

^ Jk*» Samud, ^La Silih.

' Poc. Spec, p. 8.

' The passages which treat of this are the following : — Suras VII.
71—78, XI. 64—72, XXII. 43, XXV. 40, XXVI. 141—160, XXVII. 46—55,
XXIX. 37, XXXVIII. 12, XL. 32, XLI, 12—18, L, 12, LI. 43—46, LIII.
51, LTV, 23—33, LXIX. 4-6, LXXXV. 18, LXXXIX. 8, XCI. 11—16.

94 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

he even bade them share water with her.' But the unbe-
lievers of his time (according to one passage 2 only nine in
number) hamstrung her^ and so divine punishment over-
took them. I find no similar occurrence in Jewish writings,
but the likeness of the name points to Shelah 3 who how-
ever, as the father of Bber, would have deserved mention
before him.4 On the whole, the word is so general in its
meaning of " a pious man " that we cannot treat it here
with certainty as having been originally a proper name.5
Perhaps the story of the houghing is founded on the
words in Jacob's blessing of his sons,'' and the sharing
of the water on the etymology of the name Samnd.?
Moreover Samrid was, according to the commentators,
the son of Gether the son of Aram, the son of Shem,
the son of Noah, which fits in fairly well with the date
already assigned to Shelah. 8 It is however impossible

' Sura LIV 28, XCI. 12.
2 Sura XXVir. 49.

' riytiJ See Genesis, x. 24. This is also D'Hei'belot's view. See his
Bib. Orient, under S41ih.

* IsmA'fl ben 'Ali asserts however that SAlih lived after Hud. (Maracc,
Prodr,, iv. 93).

* Later Arabians call Shelah also gJL. as in the passage quoted above
from Elpherar, who gives however a different genealogy for SAlih in his
comment on Sura VII. 11. Still, in a copy of the Samaritan Arabic
translation of the Pentateuch nbtt?) is translated by c'"'. (Compare
De Saoy in Eichhorn's Bihliothelc der BiU. titer., X, pp. 47, 110, 111.)

« Genesis, xlix. 6. "litiJ !nj717 D3!£-l3!|
' From U '< to demand water."

° The y^,aJ^ s^^^fe^^ mentioned in Sura XV. 80 are supposed to be the

same as the Samtidites, as Elpherar also says j but this opinion has no
foundation and appears improbable, because in this passage where chrono-
logical order seems to be observed, the stories of Abram and the Angels,
of Lot in connection with Abram, and of the Midianites are given earlier.

ABRAHAM TO MOSES. 95

for me to give any more exact explanation from Jewish
writings.

C- — Abraham to Moses.

Though the saints mentioned earlier bore some likeness
to Muhammad, and though their condition, so similar to
his own, encouraged him as well as verified his statements,
yet Abraham 1 was his great prototype, the man of whom
he thought most highly, and the one with whom he liked
best to compare himself and to make out as one with him-
self in opinion. Abraham's faith 2 is that which is preached
in the Qur£n.3 He was a believer in the unity of Grod.4
He was neither Jew nor Christian for it is written : ^
" Abraham was not a Jew, nor a Christian, but he was a
believer in the unity of God, given up to God (a Muslim) ." ^

* ^\^\ * E. ' S<ira XVI. 124.

* ^°n.t: Sura II. 129, III. 60, VI. 79, XVI. 121, 124.

* Sura II. 134. it^ U~^ 'Ji f^ ] ^]j^ S^ Uj^' ^V^^ ,^U^U

* On this BaidhAwi has the following :

" The Jews and the Christians disputed about Abraham, and each
party believed they could count him on their side. They appealed to
Muhammad and thereupon came this revelation. The meaning is, that
Judaism and Christianity first came into existence by the sending of the
Law through Moses and the Gospel through Jesus." That this is the
Jewish view is shown by the following passage : —

-1H7S spy -lawa? Pibs n-iinn bs nt<[ na^ns Qn-i:?N D»p

"bipa an-ias vovj

• ' : T T ; - - T

" Our forefather Abraham observed the whole Law, for it is written
(Genesis, xxvi. 5.): "Because Abraham obeyed My voice, and kept
My charge, My commandments, My statutes and My laws." (yoma,.
xxviii. 2).

96 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

He is represented as the friend of God,l and this is

his name throughout the Bast.2 Abraham's importance

and the rich legendary material concerning him, which

Judaism offered, lead us to expect much about him in

the Qurin, and our expectation is not disappointed. It is

to him that the founding of the Ka'bah is traced back.3

He is supposed to have lived in the Temple,* and to have

composed books.5 This opinion is also held by the Eabbis,

many of whom attribute to Abraham the well-known

cabalistic and undoubtedly very ancient Sepher Jazirah.

Passing to the events of his life, we first come across the

beautiful legend of his attaining to the true knowledge of

God. We are told also how he tried to persuade his

father and his people thereto. A special instance of this

was when he destroyed the idols, and, putting the staff into

the hand of the largest, attributed the action to him. He

sought thus to convince the people, who quite perceived

the impossibility of the idols having done it, since they

could not move, but they were not thereby persuaded. ^

Abraham is represented as praying in vain that his father

might be released from the punishment of hell.^ We are

told too that the people, embittered by Abraham's conduct

towards the idols, wanted to have him burnt alive, but that

he was rescued from that fate by divine intervention.^

The whole story is taken from the Rabbinical writings,

where we read as follows. 9 " Terah was an idolater : once

> m JjLs. ' Sdra 17. 124. Iji f^^\j>\ m j«j\ .

3 Sura II. 119 ff. * Silra XIV. 40. * lxXXVII. 19.

° Siiraa VI, 74-82, XIX. 42—51, XXI. 52—69, XXII. 43, XXVI. 69-
105, XXIX. 16—23, XXXVII. 81—95, XLIII. 25-28, LX. 4—6.
"> SuraB IX. 115, XXVI. 86—104, LX. 4. Sunna 395.
" Suraa II. 260, XXI. 69-74, XXIX. 23—27, XXXVII. 95—99.
' Midrash Rabba on Genesis, para. 38,

nnn^N^ a^trin -inwb pea ^qt in n\r\ Q'^ab^b i?^ m.n

ABRAHAM TO MOSES . 97

he went away and left Abraham to sell his idols. When-
ever a buyer came^ Abraham asked him his age. If ho
replied, I am fifty, or sixty years old, Abraham said : ' Woe
to the man of sixty who desires to worship the work of a
day, so that the buyer went away ashamed.' l Once a woman
came, with a dish of wheat and said, ' Here, put this before
them ; ' but Abraham took a stick and beat down all the

rrb -laH mni i5r.'![ ^V'^ ^^^ i5 ''0« ^}U vnnri -15b
npi rritr is ptrnn -12 nb -lasi njqi ns 1^2^ nias ns
i3Dab •'sni rnti? 12 mm Miaa s:innb nb •'i nb -««

- ; ■ : - T I • • - T -: - t; - : - •• - t

snriM sin nns lat m ib Tibrn u??3na ^l\Tl^ •'ai-* inb

^~>Xl 'iJ^ «0 ^^. ^l»y. ^^°'^: '=13''? ^lU "^T? i^p^rt?
s^b-ips ^inb^b limnsn"! pit? sd^hs no? di? Vin'^aiiT
N-i^2S sns5. 753 i'in"'3''3 niqi «2-ii sts SD^ipa nn^ii
sin nns Trsa -iq33 na 'b 's ins tinb "r5S 7a rrb i^^j
^lil 'frb wn ''b nnasi nbb'^ trr? Niq rrb s^-'S'^ snns
VII "'aiP bD'-s S3y laN VI "P: TifT'»"!i?^ riani-j pn^aii?
spbpa np? ]in''3;3 niqi sai ^in d,? •'aii? bs^s s:y las
^b"! 'b 's i^3S r^lV "'? n^?5 "^*^ '^? '^ V Visiani.
nap? 'b 's ibaab nipa^ nnp: -las r\>BW na fyits nrj^tp;!
nbb3 b 's s-fl2 rs^^l *<t^^ "'?^?1 ^^'J^y '^ '^^ ^"P^V
12P3 'b 's s;a ]>v^^ '^??5?^ "'?.9? 1? °^ ''^ '¥ ^t'5^ i|.^?
13D3 'b 's S33S -iinai sn^-ib lao: 's 's 'b 's sjjx^b
ns i"<ba ns sn^i bnp'^ str;^ -13b ispai. 'b 's snmb
oina 'TT5''bt»a 13s nn -I'isb sbs niqrit?7a •'a'^s •'ay ""sntpa
nn-ias it' ^laaa Tib-^a"-! ib mnntsa nnsa? nbs sa-'i

T T ; •* "T V • ' : • " ; V . . • T . T v: t :

biaa"! trsn lEJnpb

' Abnlfeda (Hist. Anteisldmica, page 20) says :

" Azar the father of Abraham made idols and served them and bade
Abraham sell them, bat Abraham, said : ' Who would buy that which
harms him and does him no good ?' "

98 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

idols, and put the stick into the hands of the largest idol.
When his father returned, he said, ' Who has done this ?'
On which Abraham replied, ' Why should I deny it ? ' A
woman came with a dish of wheat and bade me set it in
front of them. I had scarcely done so when each wanted
to eat before the other, and the greatest beat them all
down with the stick which he had in his hand. Terah
said : ' What art thou inventing for me ? Have they then
understanding ? ' Abraham replied. ' Do thine ears not
hear what thy mouth says ? ' Then Terah took him and
gave him over to Nimrod, who said : ' We will worship
fire.' Abraham said : ' Rather water, which extinguishes
fire.' Nimrod replied : ' Water then.' 'Rather the cloud
which carries water.' ' The cloud then.' ' Rather the wind
which scatters the cloud.' ' The wind then.' ' Rather
men, who endure the wind.' Nimrod at this became angry
and said : ' Thou art only making a speech. I worship
fire and will throw thee into it. The God whom thou dost
worship may come and save thee out of it.' Abraham
was then thrown into a glowing furnace, but was saved
from it." The intercession for his father is not men-
tioned in Jewish writings ; and that this was fruitless,
yea that Abraham, arriving at a clearer understanding,
desisted from his attempt,! seems to directly contradict
the Jewish view as expressed in the following passage. 2
" By the words, thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace, it was
shown to Abraham that his father was a partaker in eter-
nal life." Further, a Rabbinical saying 3 declares as a
general rule that " the son makes the father clean, but not
the father the sou." But Muhammad very often combats

' Sura IX. 115. ^ Midraeh Rabba on Genesis, para. 38.

pbn V3Hb t£7.';t^ i-it»3 Dibt»3 ^''jninfe? bit. sinri nj^ss"]

See Genesis, xv. IB. «an nVwb
3 Sanhedrin 104. WIS •'3JJ3 «b W3S N2N i3Tt5 Sna

ABRAHAM TO M03ES. 99

this view and the similar one that the merits of ancestors
count for good to their posterity.^ For example he says :
" That people (the Patriarchs) are now passed away ; they
have what they gained and ye shall have what ye gain, and
ye shall not be questioned concerning that which they have
done." 2 That Muhammad brings forward a dialogue be-
tween Abraham and the people, where the Midrash has one
with his father only, is explained by the fact that Abraham
is intended to be a type of Muhammad, and so it is neces-
sary that he should be represented as a public preacher.
Another circumstance which is mentioned in the Qurdn,
viz., that Lot became a believer with and through Abraham,^
may possibly have arisen from a passage in the Midrash
immediately following that quoted above, which says that
Haran the father of Lot was at first irresolute, but turned
to Abraham's opinion after the deliverance of the latter.
Haran however failed in the ordeal of fire to which he was
then subjected. The idea of Lot's conversion, however, is
chiefly derived from the account given of his subsequent
life, in which he shows himself to be a pious man ; and
it is probably for this reason that Muhammad connects
him with the event just related. Muhammad appears
sometimes to have so confounded himself with Abraham
that, in the middle of speeches ascribed to the latter, he
indulges in digressions unsuitable to any but himself, and
thus falls from the part of narrator into that of admonisher.
In one passage 4 a long description of Hell and Paradise is
found, and in another ,5 the declaration that those who came
before had also been charged with imposture. No doubt
Abraham might have said this with reference to Noah,
Hud and S41ih; still the words here seem rather forced
into his speech, and indeed in one verse we find the word
" say " which is to be regarded in the Qur^n as the stand-

' mas mat ' Sura II, 128, 135. ^ g^^as XXI. 71, XXIX. 26.
'* Sura XXVI. 88—104. * Sura XXIX. 17—23.

100 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

ing address of God (or Gabriel) to Muhammad.l Thia
view renders it unnecessary to adopt the desperate expedi-
ent of Walil, who supposes a transposition of verses, or an
interpolation. The true explanation is rather Muhammad's
entire identification of Abraham with himself. Further,
he is not content with making Abraham preach against
idolatry, he represents him also as teaching the doctrine
of the Eesurrection of the dead.2 The lack however of full
certainty about this doctrine 3 caused Abraham, according
to the Muhammadan view, to pray for a tangible proof of
it, and then was vouchsafed to him what the Rabbis call 4
the " covenant between the divided pieces." 5

He was convinced through the fact that the divided
birds came together again and became living,^ a view
which is foreign to Judaism. How Muhammad came to
call Abraham's father, (whose name is given in the Bible as
Terah,^ Azar 8 is at first sight not clear, but is completely
explained when we consider the source ^ of his informa-
tion, namely Eusebius. In his Church History, Eusebius
calls him Athar 10 which is an easy transition from Thara,

I Compare above on Noah. ^ S<iras II. 260, XXVI. 81.

^ Baidhawi says on Sura II. 262 :

" It is said that, after Nimrod had said : ' I make alive and I kill,
(II. 260), Abraham answered : ' Quickening is brought about by the return
of the spirit to the body.' Nimrod replied : ' Hast thou then seen that ? '
Abraham could not answer in the aflSrmative and had to pass over to
another argument. On this he prayed to the Lord tor some revelation,
in order that his mind might bo easy about an answer to this question, if
it were put to him again."

* D''-in3n ^"iSl re-;? ' Genesis, xv. 9. £f. * Siira II. 262.

' ni^n Siira VI. 74. _jj\ 9 Pointed out by Maraoc Prodr., iv. 90.

'A.dap from ^apa, hence Aiabio. jj*

ABRAHAM TO MOSES. 101

and then the Greek Athar was easily converted into the
Arabic Azar.l The reason which is given by some Arabic
commentators 2 is ridiculous. They maintain that Azar is
like Y4zzar,3 and that this means : 4 "0, perverted one,
O, erring one ; " and Abraham is supposed to have thus
addressed his idolatrous father.5 We now pass on to the
more mature married life of Abraham and come to his
meeting with the angels,^ whom he receives as guests.'^
Abraham took them for Arabs, was much surprised that
they did not eat and stepped back in fear, whereupon they
announced to him that he would have a son and told him
also of the coming destruction of Sodom. In one passage
of the Talmud 8 we read : " They appeared to him nothing
else but Arabs ; " and in another passage 9 it ia said

' According to the Tirikh Muntakhab, Azar was the father of Tharah
(D'Herbelot Bib. Orient, under Abraham, page 11).

' Vide Maraoo. on the passage, 'jjU * JU U gj** \i

' But later Arabs know the right name 5)\j , too, though strange to
say whenever they speak of Abraham they use the name jj\ ; but when
on other occasions they mention Abraham's father, they call him by
the other name. Thus Elpherar on Sura VII. 78 : jjjij y^ t)\)^ (:>* ^^
A*ei^j\ (-i\ (^\ The last (^\ here refers again to Lot, (which is
shown by the manner of writing ^^\ with an alif) just as later Abraham
is called the ^c ^ uncle of Lot. Also on Sura XXI. 71. Elpherar hag
the following : UgJ yVS" j ,«*fc\j}\ ^\ y» t)\)^ ) Cj^ t>* (:j\)^ t)< ^^ fy

Attention is more rarely called to the fact that both names are
the same. See Elpherar on Sura XXXI. 11 wherein giving the genealogy
of Luqmin. He says jj'^ ysi. cjVj. See also Abulfeda Hist. Anteisldmica,
pp. 18 and 20.

^ Sura XI. 72. Uuj , on which Elpherar remarks : &SJW< J-jSW 'i^j\
" By messengers he means Angels."

' Genesis, xviii. Suras XI. 72-79, XV. 51-61, XXIX, 30-.32, LI. 24-88.

8 Qiddnshin 62. I3^''::-^l?b sbs ib !1013 t^b

8 BabaMezia,86. 2. -ibaMi HKiab ^ni; n-i.^n •<?Mba

>iritt5i >ib3S!^ nn? r^ii-^^ sa^s n^!:? trnyi Wi'ib? 'ib5M onb

102 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

" The angels descended and ate. They ate ? No, but it
appeared as though they ate and drank." There is only
one error to be found in the account as given in the Qur^n.
The doubt as to whether in the advanced age of the pair
a son could come into the world (which in other passages
and in the Bible is put into the mouth of Sarah) is. here
uttered by Abraham, but in very mild words. l It is true
that in the other Biblical account of the promise to
Abraham, he himself is represented as doubting God's
word.2 In other passages the position of words and
clauses might give rise to many errors, if we did not know
the story better beforehand from the Bible. Thus in one
passage ^ the laughter of Abraham's wife is given before
the announcement is made, which leads the Arabic com-
mentators to manifold absurd guesses. Blpherar by the
side of these explanations (many of them quite wanting in
truth) gives the right one in the following words : * " Bin
'Abb^s and "W^hib say : ' she laughed from astonishment
that she should have a child, for both she and her husband
were of a great age.' Then the verse was transposed, but
it ought to run thus : ' And his wife stood while We
promised him Isaac, and after Isaac, Jacob, and then she
laughed.' " It might seem that this son who was promised
to Abraham was with deliberate forgery identified with
Ishmael, because he is regarded as the ancestor of the
Arabs ; and so too the ensuing temptation 5 connected
with the sacrifice of his son is made to refer to Ishmael.

1 Sura XV. 54 fE. " Genesis, xv!i. 17. ' Sira XI. 74.

B^JkfS j-iW\j ^Aa»!^ ^Jt!■ &i^\ Q}}^ J^\ \^ (jicj Ig^^j (^j \^ — ,
' This is referred to in general terms in Sura II. 118, thus :
Cf. Mishna Aboth. v, 8.

^:^2H nm2N nsana ni:T'D3 nnws

■T tt:~ t":- ;• tT~;

ABRAHAM TO MOSES. 103

G-round for this acceptation is given in another passage^l
when after the dispute about the idols has been related,
we read from v. 99 as follows : " Wherefore We acquainted
him that he should have a son who should be a meek
youthj and when he had attained to years of discre-
tion Abraham said unto him : ' 0, my son ! I saw

in a dream that I should offer thee in sacrifice.' " He
declared himself ready, on which Abraham heard a voice
telling him that he had already verified the vision ; and a
noble victim ransomed him. And then the passage con-
tinues : 2 " And We rejoiced him with the promise of Isaac,
a righteous prophet ; and We blessed him and Isaac ; and of
their offspring were some righteous doers, and others who
manifestly injured their own souls." That the announce-
ment of Isaac first appears here is a proof that the
preceding context 3 refers to Ishmael. It is therefore
evident that according to Muhammad's representation the
sacrificial action was performed on Ishmael, and further on
this will be shown more in detail. But it is not clear that
the announcement of the angels refers to him, seeing that
in one of the three places where the same word 4 is used
of this angelic announcement, it is explicitly applied to
Isaac. That the angels had a two-fold mission — (1) to
Abraham, in order to show him his fatherhood and the
destruction of Sodom, and (2) to Lot, in order to remove
him from Sodom before the destruction was accomplished,
is Biblical and Muhammad follows the Bible narrative.
We have already mentioned that Lot is supposed to have

> Sura XXXYII. 99—114. = Sura XXXVII. 112, US.

_ isuj o - - - '. r— ''T- i-5n n °'(T ' 1® - ' - S -'■-'' "- -

* ^;yt^ <s_.iJ ^It^ y— «y.
3 As also islt and U»aj j in v. 113.
* 'Jj, Sura XI. 74 ; Of. other two passages, Sura XXXVII. 99 and 112.

104 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

become a believer through Abraham. The visitation of
the angels, which is related in Genesis, xix. 1 — 27, is
mentioned in several passages in the Qur^n.l On the
whole the narrative is fairly true, but the details are not
entirely free from embellishment. For example, in some
passages 2 the warning addressed to the people of Sodom on
account of their unchaste use of men is treated quite
separately from the narrative of the angels, and Muham-
mad makes out that the angels told Lot 3 and even
Abraham 4 beforehand that Lot's wife should not be saved.
The unbelief of Lot's wife receives particular notice in one
passage,^ while the destruction of the cities is mentioned
in many passages. ^ Muhammad especially attributes to
Lot the distinguishing mark common to all preachers, viz.,
that they ask for no reward.^

It has already been remarked that, according to Muham-
mad's showing, Ishmael * was the son whom Abraham was

1 Suraa VII. 78—83, XI. 79-86, XV. 61—78, XXII. 43, XXVI. 160—176,
XXVII. 55—60, XXIX. 27-35, XXXVII. 133-137, LIV. 33—39.

2 Compare especially Sura XXIX. 27—30.

^ Suras XI. 83, XXIX. 82. According to the reading ciii5\j/.\ in the
Ace. (Sura XI. 83), Lot did not even once ask her to accompany him,
but left her with the people of Sodom. This reading is not only adopted
by Hinckelmann, but by almost all the Arabic commentators quoted in
Elpherar ; which reading, as he remarks, is confirmed by the variant
reading of Ben Mas'ud, who puts the word u£\;\jv«\ before S,.

* Suras XXIX. 31, XV. 60. « Sura LXVI. 10.

^ S6ra XXV. 42, and other passages. ' Sura XXVI. 164.

* On the passage quoted above (Sura XXXVII. 101) Elpherar
remarks as follows :

" The learned among the Muslims are divided about the lad whom
Abraham was commanded to sacrifice j whereas the people o£ the Book
on both sides (Jews and Christians) are agreed that he was Isaac, and
common people are at one with them." Many commentators are then
quoted, who also share this opinion. J;*«...\ y» (jp/A J^ j " Others,

ABRAHAM TO MOSES. 105

commanded to sacriSce ; and the reasons have been given
which persuaded Muhammad to represent Ishmael as a

however say that he was Ishmael," and for this opinion the authorities
are now cited :

y^ ^Si Sy»\ ^x .]\ &«/• A1> Uii ^.jl-. f)^ Sljj Iwfi dJyiJ y^yiJ) (^ ET^^

6j*E f^i*!) y\ j_jlc Jjii U-j j\ja_.U sUjJu-i J(^ j;jjjk*!\ iai ^^ t^j^^ "^

>-->^s«s ^jU»-^ Ajj y^j tjW-.U sUyi-j jjA ijy^ ^ JU (_5!Uj (Ji3\ yU Uij\ j

" Both views are supported by the words of Muhammad. Those who
maintain that Isaac was the one sacrificed prove it from Sura XXXVII. 99 •
' We brought him the joyful news that he should have a meek son.'
And when he was grown up, then God commanded Abraham to offer up
him who had been announced to him. But we do not read in the Quria
that any son except Isaac was foretold to him, as it is written in the Sura
entitled Hud: 'And we announced to him Isaac' — Sura XI, 74. Those
however who maintain that Ishmael was the one sacrificed prove it from
the fact that the announcement of Isaac comes after the completion of
the story of the sacrifice, when we read for the first time : ' And
we rejoiced him with the promise of Isaac, a righteous prophet.' —
Sura XXXVII. 112. This shews that the sacrificed person was another
than Isaac. (The same view is given in detail by Jalilu'd-din as quoted by
Maracc.) Further it is said in Sura Hud (XI. 74) : ' We promised him
Isaac and after Isaac, Jacob. As he had announced Isaac, so he also
announced to him Isaac's son Jacob.' How could he then have commanded
the sacrifice of Isaac, when he had promised seed through him ?' This
last proof is truly not to be ranked very high, for a similar contradiction
in Holy Scripture in the case of Genesis, xxi. 12, and Genesis, xxii. would
then have to be explained. Beyond the first proof adduced, there is no
necessity either for this argument, or for still another argument which
immediately afterwards is cited in the commentary, viz., that the horns
of the ram are preserved in Mecca, the dwelling-place of Ishmael. It
will have been noted that in the text I have independently decided in
favour of the view that Muhammad believed that it was Ishmael whose
sacrifice was ordered of God.

Doubtless all Arabian authorities would have come to this same
conclusion, had not the Jews and Christians expressed thair opinion so
decidedly in favor of Isaac (in which they were followed by the common
0

106 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

very righteous man,l to include him in the ranks of the
patriarchs and prophets,^ to mention him as the righteous
son of Abraham,^ and to make out that he laid the founda-
tion stone of the Ka'bah in connection with his father .4

people). This fact prevented many from giving to the text of the QurSn
Bnffioiently impartial consideration, and hence led them to abandon
Mu5jammad'B real view. The method by which these attempted to
weaken the proof for the opposite opinion is clear from Elpherar's com-
ment on Sura XXXVII. 112 :
ixcUo \y^ L^ j^ls!"'^ S.^\ Sjbfc Juo wAo JU J;.ir.», ,A p-tA^^ ij** (t^^)

" He who takes it that Ighmael was the one sacrificed explains that it
was after this event that Isaac a prophet wag promised to Abraham as
a reward for his obedience ; he who takes it that Isaac was the one
aaorificed explains that it was only the prophetic gift of Isaac which was
announced to Abraham. Akhrama in the name of Ibn 'Abbas explains
tliat Isaac was announced to his father twice, once before his birth and
again at the attainment of the prophetic gift." In the following verse,
however, which upholds our view still more strongly, Blpherar gives
an erroneous explanation of one part of the verse, and about the rest
maintains a significant silence. Thus he explains lUlc as follows : —
&jS.\ ^ *sii\;j\ i4^ (T^. " T^^^i is to say, to Abraham in his children ; "
but the word Wga, j^ which is inexplicable on this interpretation of
&^ he does not explain at all. In the legends of Isl4m, as Elpherar has
already remarked in his comment on the word |«4i, Isaac is almost
without an exception spoken of as the one led to sacrifice. So also in
Elpherar on Sura XII. 36, where Joseph relates his history to his fellow-
prisoners, and on Sura XII. 86, where mention is made of a letter written
by Jacob to the king who was keeping his sou in prison. Here Isaac is
always called iii\ »*> J " The sacrificed of God." And when Jacob in the
course of the letter (quite according to the version of Sepher HayySshSr)
alludes to the special protection of God enjoyed by his family he says :

"As for my father, both his hands and his feet were bound, and the
knife was put to his throat, but God ransomed him." Compare also
Abulfeda Hist. AnteisUmica, page 22.

> Suras XIX. 55, 56, XXI. 85, 86. ' Sura XIV. 41.

2 Suras II. 130, 1.34, III. 77, VI. 86, XXXVIII, 48. * Sura II. 119.

ISHMAEL AND ISAAC.

107

Tkis view is certainly not Jewish, but at the same time it
is not contrary to Judaism, for the Eabbis tell us ^ that by
the utterance : " Thou shalt be buried in a good old age
(Genesis, xy. 15.) God showed Abraham that Ishmael
would repent." And in the Talmud it is said 2 that Ishmael
repented during his father's life-time. From his habit of
reckoning Ishmael among the patriarchs, Muhammad fell
into the error of counting him as an ancestor of .Jacob.
Thus in one passage ^ he says : " The God of thy fathers,
Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac," which Baidhawi attempts
to explain in the following manner ; 4 " Hq counts Ishmael
among his ancestors, connecting him with the father — the
grand-father also is the same as the father — and as
Muhammad says. The uncle is a part of the father. Then
pointing to 'Abbas, his uncle, he said. This is the survivor
of my forefathers."

As he hereby transfers to Ishmael the actibn, which as
the most worthy, is attributed by the Jews to Isaac, viz.,
readiness to be sacrificed, the latter remains simply a pious
man, about whom there is little to relate and who is quite
destitute of all legendary adornment. In consequence of
this, Isaac appears only in the lists of the patriarchs, and
almost always in those passages where Abraham's deliver-
ance from the fire is mentioned and also his reward for
his piety. In these passages Muhammad following more
the popular tradition mentions Isaac and Jacob but not
Ishmael.

T ; V " T : • V : • t t -• : --it'

Mid. Eab. on Genesis, para. 38.

» Baba Bathra 16. V:?« "'.^(l? n2!ltrri ilbv bsjJajf?";

' Sura II. 127.

* i%^\ <iJc ii^ »->SVi^ -^^^^^ '^'^ WiJ*' i^W^ o^ Js«*-^ J^cj
* ^\)\ iJu \ jut lUc <sl3\ j_yo, (j»^\ ^y JU US' <i*}\ jio J=.jl\ ^ fX^\j

108 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

We are now struck by the strange confusion whicli
seems to have existed in Muhammad's mind about Jacob. ^
He seems to have been uncertain whether he was Abra-
ham's son, or his grandson, the son o£ Isaac. While there
is no passage which says explicitly that he was Abraham's
son, yet this idea is conveyed to all who have not learned
differently from the Biblical history. In the angel's
announcement 2 it is said, " after Isaac, .Jacob; "^ and in
other passages * we read : " We gave to him {i.e. to
Abraham) Isaac and Jacob." In the Sunna, however,
Joseph is called clearly the grandson and Jacob the son of
Abraham .5 Although these passages do not prove the
point absolutely, yet those passages which can be brought
forward in support of the opposite view are much less
powerful. For if it must be allowed that in two passages ^
Abraham and Isaac, and in one of these Jacob also, are
mentioned as the forefathers of Joseph, we can also shew
another passage^ where Ishmael is mentioned as a fore-
father of Jacob without any continuous genealogy having
been given. And further, since in the passage last cited
Abraham, Ishmael and Isaac are counted as the fathers
of Jacob, it is clear from the mention of Ishmael among
the others how great was the confusion which reigned in
Muhammad's mind about Jacob's parentage.

We by no means assert that Muhammad took Jacob for
the son of Abraham, but it is evident that the relationship

1 . _•■««; ^ Sura XI. '74. >.. <tn.»; (3jar».\ s'^j. i^^

' The Arabic commentators, who may not and will not nnderstand
these words as we do, are obliged to seek some other reasons for the
unsuitable allusion to Jacob. Thus Elpherar says :—

"It was announced to her that she would live till she saw her
son's son."

* Suvas VI. 84, XIX. 50, XXI. 12, XXIX. 26.

* Snnna 398 and 400. ' Sura XII. 6, 38. ' Sura II. 127,

JACOB. 109

between the two was not clear to him. This error did
not spread ; on the contrary, the later Arabs were better
acquainted with these relationships. Thus, e.g., Zamakh-
shari saysi^ "It is related of the prophet that he said,
' If you are asked, who is the noble one ? ' answer : ' The
noble one, the son of the noble one, the son of the noble one,
the son of the noble one is Joseph, the son of Jacob, the son
of Isaac, the son of Abraham.' "2 But this is no testi-
mony to the full certainty of Muhammad himself, for often
the traditions spread among the later Arabs are more correct
than those given in the Quran, as we said before in the
case of the sacrifice of Isaac. Only a little is given of
Jacob's life. There is an allusion to his wrestling with the
Angel in the following words : 3 " All food was allowed
to the children of Israel before the revelation of the
Law;, except what Israel (as he is here called) 4 forbade
himself." This is evidently an allusion to the Biblical
passage where the prohibition against eating the sinew of
the thigh 5 is nientioned,6 which Baidh^wi'' also gives, but
assigns a wrong reason for it. Beyond this allusion and
the history of Joseph, in which he is also involved and
which we will give later on, the only other thing told
about Jacob is his admonition before his death. This is

> On Sura XII. 4.
^^^ ^/J\ ^^\ f^./i\ V/i ^jS3^ ^^ J-J \s\ <Uc m J^ ^^\ ^^^

(See de Saoy Anthologie Graramatioale, 125).

s Elpherar has nearly the same words, with the addition however of a
long chain of traditions.

3 Siira III. 87. i~^ Jc Jf\J-} 'fj^ ^

* Israel is s^y*} BaidhSwi.

' ntDSn T'a * Genesis, xxxii, 33. ' L.jJ\ ^^ s

i,c

110 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

given in accordance with rabbinical sources as follows : ^
" And Abrabam commanded this to his sons,2 even to
Jacob : ' My children, verily God hath chosen this religion
for you, therefore die not unless ye also be resigned.'
Were ye present when Jacob was at the point of death ?
When he said to his sons, ' Whom will ye worship after
me ? ' they answered : ' We will worship thy God and
the God of thy fathers Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac,
one God, and to him will we be resigned.' " We find
something similar in the Eabbinical writings : 3 "At the
time when Jacob was leaving the world, he called his
twelve sons and said to them : ' Hear your father Israel,^ is
there any doubt in your hearts about God ? ' they said :
* Hear Israel our father, as in thy heart there is no doubt
about God, so also there is in ours ; but the Lord is our
God, the Lord is one.' 5 Then he spoke out and said :
^ Praised be the name of his glorious kingdom, for ever.' " 6
The sons of .Jacob are not individually mentioned, but they
appear in the list of the Patriarchs as " the tribes," '' so
called because of the subsequent division into tribes ;
Joseph 8 alone enjoying an honorable exception. Besides

' Sura II. 126—7. ° Compare perhaps Genesis, xviii. 19.

' Midr. Rab. on Genesis, para, 98, and on Deateronomy, para. 2.

n\3E;b N-jij Dbwrr p -iq?3 n2>::« 3p5^ n;nt^ n^tra
cJ"* Nato D3''3M bsnto"' bN TODD nnb -ibn vaa -iir3>

T •• *.■•": •■ T . • V ; ■ V T -T TT T T

\^-\b\ rop ib inps s^n ijna triij^rr b^ rii7;bria naaaba
^"|« "ns 'n '2 ' y)r\ bv n;ybqa ?j?b5 X'^xd d^s -la^ns!
aJ-iQ s!in fi« iq^ 'n sia^'ribN "n Nb« npbna ^23b5

* Genesis, xUx. 2. * Deuteronomy, vi. 4.

^ Comp. the two recensions of the Jerusalem Targum on Deuteronomy,
vi. 4 ; also Tract Pesaohim, page 56.

JOSEPH. Ill

being alluded to in one other passagOji Joseph forms the
theme of almost the whole of the twelfths Sdra,2^ which
is named after him. This Sura contains thB^narrative
given us in Ggnesis!^ with many abbreviations it is true, but
also with many additions and alterations, which must be
pointed out. We must first mention the additions which
are derived from Jewish legend. Among these is the
statement that Joseph was inclined towards Potiphar's
wife, but that a sign warned him from her.* The Eab-
binical comment on the words " He went into the house
to do his work" 5 runs as follows : 6 " Both intended to
commit sin j" and on the words " She caught him by his
garment saying, ' Lie with me,' " Eabbi Yohinin remarks,
" Both had got on to the bed, when the form of his father
appeared to Joseph at the window and said : " Joseph,
Joseph, one day the names of thy brethren will be graven
on the stones of the Ephod, also thine ; wilt thou that it
shall be effaced?" 7 The fable that the Egyptian women

1 Sura XL. 86. ' Sura XII. 4—108,

' Genesis, xxxvii. 9 — 86 and chapters, xxxix to xlvi.

* Sura XII. 24. i^j yUy ^J\J y\ 2^3 V« ^j

5 Genesis, xxxix. 11. * Sotah, XXXVI. 2.

>^-i -i»N inpsba nitsyb nn>pr\ whji mn di'^n? ^ri':')
-ibsb i^?33 :int»Bnrii ^a^gna nnny. -innb dn^saJ i^jiv
nr!» nrii«5 wip'^V. nn'^aa? rrmh -ibst^ labip ■^isv nnpD?
ripii pp'v ib -)»N libna ib rr^sna^ '(''?« bi» sap.;;'? nns^s
Tjj'iTi Dn"'3i3 nriMi -liSM ""S^s b? ^nri?^t» "^V^i VTOV.

' Blpherar in his comment on the verse qnoi>ed gives some of these
particulars :

" It is said on the authority of Ben ■ Abbis that he said he had undone
his girdle and approached her with a sinful purpose." jii\ ^ SoUi JUi

112 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

mocked at Potiphar's wife, were invited in by Her, and in
contemplating Joseph's beauty ^ were so absorbed that they
cut their own hands, is found in an old Jewish writing 2
which, though not genuine, is certainly very ancient, and
is written is very pure Hebrew. This work is sometimes
referred to in the Midrash Yalkut under the name of " The
Great Chronicle." 3 l^ an old Jewish German translation
however, it bears another title.^ It is this translation which
I have before me as I write, and for this reason I vsill not
quote the actual words.5 Also the discussion about the

" Ketada and tie greater number of the commentators say that he saw
the form of Jacob, who said : ' 0 Joseph, though thy name is written
among the prophets yet thou behavest like the foola.' "

^ Elpherar on xii. 81, agreeing with the Sepher Hayyashar, gives,
contrary to Wahl's forced interpretation, the correct meaning as follows :

" They out themselves with the knife which they had in their hands,
thinking they were cutting the orange, but they did not feel the pain
on account of their absorption in the contemplation of Joseph."

* An allusion to this fable is found in a passage from the Midrash
Abhkir quoted in the Midr. Talkut, chapter 146,
The Qurdn story is seen to be still more like the narrative in Sepher

HayySshSr, wHen one adds the following details. The word \Xs/» (verse
81) comes from tiT (viii) to lean against, like the Eabbinical niWD
from TSG to support, prop ; and like the Hebrew 5DJ3 from 230
it signifies a meal, not on account of the new strength and support which
food gives (to which one might easily be led by the expression 27 ^pp>
compare especially Psalm, civ. 15), but on account of the oriental method
of leaning against supports at meals, as Elpherar rightly observes :

JOSEPH. 113

tearing of tlie clothes, whether they were torn in front or
at the backj l is found in the same way in the Sepher
Hayyashdr. In the words, " and a witness bore witness," 2
which we here do not take strictly according to the
meaning of the context, but rather in the sense of an
" arbitrator decided," 3 others see an allusion to a witness

" Several Arabic eommentatord say that \X;o» means food, because
the people when they sit eating lean against pillows. Therefore food is
called by way of metonomy \S^." On this word the same Elpherar
farther comments as follows ; bJ\ (^S > \ii:i^ j\, iJ\ ^ \A •

"In the copy of Shuwaz \S^ is written with a, vowelless te(cu).
Opinions are divided as to the meaning of this word. Ben 'Abbas says it
is an O'-ange, Muj^hid asserts the same thing. Some say an orange is
thus called in Abyssinia. Dhuhak says it is the Indian fruit Zumaward.

'Akr says i^Xx^ js every thing which is cut with a knife. Abu Zaid
the Christian, says that whenever anything is out with a knife it is called
by the Arabs cdx/», since uM,* and cau> with mim (j«) and be, (v_>) meg-n
among the Arabs cutting." According to the reading cibw which some
adopt, it would mean an orange or Ey\, and we are told expressly in
Sepher Hayyash&r that Joseph's mistress offered this fruit to the women
visiting her. Now our reading seems to me the right one, and the

meaning given to cds^ very doubtful, for the Arabic commentators
themselves are much divided in opinion, and their explanations are
derived only from the passage itself, as often h.ippens. Nevertheless
from their words this much is clear, that the whole legend as it is found
in the above-mentioned Jewish book has passed over to the Arabs, so that
later commentators have tried to discover every detail in the words of
the Quran.

1 Sura XII. 25. ^ I&U. J^i ^ Siira XII. 26.

^ A^U *S^ . So also Elpherar.

114 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

who was present at what occurred between Joseph and the
woman, and some of the commentators quoted in Elpherar
express themselves quite in harmony with the Sepher
Hayyashar as follows : 1 " Sa'id Ben Jubair and Dhuhak
say it was a child in the cradle which God permitted to
speak. This is the tradition of the Uphite commentator
according to 'Abbds." In the Sepher Hayyashar it is also
asserted that there was present a child of eleven months
who till then could not talk, but then attained to speech.
But there is a difference in that the Jewish book makes the
child confirm the utterance of Joseph, while the Arabic
commentator puts into its mouth the decision about the
rent clothing, which other Arabic writers reject as highly
unsuitable. Many commentators say that this was no
child,2 l3ut rather a wise man full of penetration. It follows
from this that Muhammad either mixed the two legends
inappropriately, or else that the second one came later
into Arabic tradition and was read by the Arabs into
the words of the Quran. The words 3 which Wahl
translates: "But the devil would not allow it"* that he
(the cup-bearer) thought of him (Joseph)," are explained
by the following passage : ^ " The talk of the lips tendeth
only to penury,^ because although Joseph reminded the

2 a=.j yV^ijS U<-5 yij ^5 wUSj .^.U^j ^/^} (:>~-«'5\ JU^

3 Sura XII. 42. 6^]^S yM^l ii-jU

* Wahl does not explain what *J) means here.

(Midr. Rabbah on Genesis, para. 89.) n"'pj D^'^I3P

* Proverbs, xiv. 23.

JOSEPH.

115

cup-bearer twice 1 that he should rernember him^ yet he
had to remain two more years in prison ; for it is written,
' And it was after two years.' " 2 The seeking of protection
from the butler is here regarded as sinful, and therefore
Muhammad says : " And Satan made him (Joseph) forget
the remembrance of his Lord (God)/' in that he trusted
not in God but in man.3 In the same Snra* Jacob
recommends his sons to enter by different gates j in like
manner we read in the Eabbinical writings 5 that Jacob
said to them : " Do not enter by the same door." 6
The statement^ that the brothers said, when they found
the cup in Benjamin's sack : " If he be guilty of theft his
brother hath also been guilty," is evidently an erroneous
change in the words of a passage found in the Midrash
quoted above,8 according to which they said, " See a

' Genesis, xl. 14. ^ Genesis, xli. 1.

^ Elpherar has the following :
yj JU i}j3 5j^j yUai-iJ\ 4l_oU SjJjkaj udUiS Uu.y_ ^S ^^\~^\ j_5— i^ J-i

6^ (^ gjaJ\ ^\ (_yi^ Sij jij --i— y. (3^^^-^^ ^— j^ a}r^'^'^ "^ ; (j-W^

" It is said that the batler did not remember to mention Joseph to
the king. The virtual meaning of this is that Satan made him forget
4^ 6/j the mention of him to his Lord (Pharaoh), But Ben 'Abbds and

moat aathorities after him say that Satan made Joseph forget the
remembrance of his Lord, so that he sought help apart from Him and
protection from a creature, and this was an omission to which Satan
tempted Joseph." Then he quotes many other passages which represent
this step of Joseph's as sinful,
* Sura XII, 67. ^ Midr. Rabbah on Genesis, para, 91.

nn« nnsa d^V?. =iD?3n by 3pi?i nnb -las

^ The same reason is given alike by the Arabic commentators and in the
Midrash, viz. t)*"^^ (•65!^ ^U. I'^Vn "'p.Qa— (Cf. Elpherar on the verse)
" For fear of envious looks," which the ancients regarded as very
disaatrons in their consequences.

' Sura XII. 11. * Mid. Rab,, para, 92. Nn533 15 N?32 HTl

116 JDDAISM AND ISLAM.

thief, son of a thief/' with reference to Rachel's having
stolen the Teraphim.i From the Quran it appears 2 that
Jacob knew by divine communication that Joseph still
lived, which is opposed to one Jewish view,3 but agrees
with another,^ which runs as follows : " An unbeliever,
asked our teacher, ' Do the dead live on 1 Your fathers did
not accept this, and will you accept it ? It is said of Jacob,
that he refused to be comforted.^ If he had believed that
the dead live on, would he have refused comfort ?' Then
he answered him. ' Foolish one ! he knew through the
Holy Ghost that he still lived (in the flesh), and one does
not take comfort concerning the living.' " The story that
Joseph told Benjamin beforehand who he was, is common
to the Quran ^ and the Sepher Hayyashar. Besides these
additions from Jewish legends there is also other matter
which owes its origin to error, or possibly to traditions
unknown to us. Muhammad's statement ^ that the brothers
asked their father to send Joseph with them contradicts
the Biblical account ; ^ and the statement that one of the

' Genesis, xxzi. 19. The Arabian commentators give the most varying
accoants. One of these confirms our view of an erroneous confusion
vflth Rachel, viz., the following in Blpherar : .5^.=. ^^ a,. ■»_.,.. JU

S'aid Ben Jnbair and Katada say that bis grand-father, his mother's
father, had an image which he worshipped. This he stole secretly."
2 S4ra XII. 86, 97. 3 Pirke Kabbi Bliezer, section 38.

* Mid. Tanchuma quoted in Mid. Yalkut, chapter 143,

nnsnnb isa';i ^pT_^ 3^n?-na D>•^^r2 cri«T n^'iin dj^n
ib -!K« cnannV isni? ti'T} n'^^n c\-\r^r^w v^ ii\n ^ha
rbgps? ]^ST ti s-in^ tc'-rj-n n-"n? ^T wna.- ^Db niiiir

* Genesis, xxxvii. 35. * Sura XII. 69.

7 Sura XII, 11 ff. * Genesis, xxxvii. 18 fE.

JOSEPH. 117

Ishmaelites who went to draw water found Josepli in
the pit is against the clear word of the Scripture that
the pit was dry.l Muhammad makes Joseph expound
Pharaoh's dream, and only afterwards does he have
him fetched from prison,^ in contradiction to the Bible
narrative. -"^ He asserts that Jacob became blind from
grief, but that he recovered his sight by the application
of a shirt to his eyes. He was perhaps thinking, of
Jacob's loss of sight 4 later on, or possibly the idea is
based on some legend unknown to me. According to
the Quran Joseph's parents 5 came to him in Egypt, in
spite of the fact that according to the testimony of the
Scriptures 6 Eachel was long since dead. Muhammad's
idea probably was to bring about a complete fulfilment
of the dream, which mentions both parents.^

•On this, however, some of the Rabbis remark that this
is a sign that no dream is without a mingling of some vain
matter, while others say that Bilhah, Joseph's subsequent
foster-mother, is alluded to. Something like this is quoted
by Zamakhshari, to the efiect that " this means his
father and his aunt ; " ^ while Elpherar has ^ still more
clearly : " Katada and Sada say that by the moon is
meant his aunt, because his mother Rachel was already
dead." Thus it is possible that Muhammad means
this aunt here, even as Elpherar remarks on another

1 Genesis, xxxvii. 24. D^a 12 ^^H pn -liani,

= Sura XIT. 47, 50. ^ Genesis, xli. 14 S.

* Sura XII. 84, 93, 96. Cf. Genesis, xlviii. 10.

* Sura XII. 100, 101. ii'^\ ^ Genesis, xxxv. 18 ff.
' Sura XII. 4. Cf. Genesis, xxxvii. 10. '^aN'l. ''3N

^ On Sura XII. 4. a^U.^ 6y\ Jji ^ ( De Sacy Anth. Gramm, page
127.)

118 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

passage,! to wit, that " Most commentators say that by
these are meant his father and his anut Leah, Ids mother
having died at the birth of Benjamin." It is quite in
accordance with Muhammad's usual procedure to put into
Joseph's mouth a long discourse on the unity of God and
the doctrine of a future life. This is given before the
interpretation of the dreams of his two fellow-prison ers.2
With Joseph we finish the first period, for between Joseph
and Moses Muhammad mentions no one else. It almost
soems as if, with Justin, Muhammad regarded Moses as
Joseph's son, although of course we cannot seriously
attribute such an opinion to him.

Second Chaptee.

Second Part.

Moses and his Time,

The history of the earlier times was preserved only in
brief oatliues, and was not so important either in itself,
or in the influence which it exerted on the subsequent

1 Sura XII. 100. i^\ u>J^^ U lUJU. ^ lij>\ y!> (^j a*J\ ^\ JU

' The Arabian commentators, who are quite conscious of this
unsuitability expluin it away very cleverly by saying that JosRph made
this digression, because it grieved him to be obliged to foretell evil to
one of his fellow-prisonerst Blpherar comments on verse 37 as follows :

" After they had told him the dream, be was unwilling to give them
the explanation for which they had asked him, because he recognised
in it something that would be disagreeable to one of them. For this
reason he put aside their question, and began a difierent discourse, in
which he taught them about the gift of miracle-working and exhorted
them to belief in the Unity of God.

MOSES AND HIS TIME. 119

ages ; therefore Muhammad adopted from it only snoh
legends as were edifying in themselves and to which he
could append pious reflections. In the period of which
we are now going to treat, there is certainly still a long
array of legends, but historical facts are preserved for us
with greater distinctness and clearer detail, and these
facts are of greaber religious importance The giving of
the Mosaic Law and the eventful life and noble personality
of Moses himself afford Muhammad plenty of material for
his narrative. Here we will first put together the whole
life of Moses as represented in the various passages of the
Quran, and then we will go on to consider the details to
be commented upon. Among the oppressive enactments
of Pharaoh against the children of Israel was an order
that their children should be thrown into the water.
Moses 1 the son of Amram 2 was laid by his mother
in an ark ; Pharaoh's wife, who saw the child there,
saved it from death and had it nursed by its mother.
When Moses was grown up he tried to help his oppressed
brethren, and once killed an Egyptian ; the next day
however he was reminded by an Israelite of his yesterday's
deed. This made him afraid, and by the advice of a
friend he fled to Midian,^ and married there the daughter
of a Midianite."! When he wished to leave Midian he saw
a burning bush, approached it, and received a command
to go to Egypt to warn Pharaoh 5 and to perform some
miracles to make him believe ; he asked for his brother
Aaron as an assistant in this work.^ He obeyed the
command and accomplished his mission, but Pharaoh
remained unbelieving and assembled his magicians, who

3 --'■-

« Saraa XX. 37-44, XXVIII. 2-29. = y^^

« Suras XX. 8-37, 44-51, XXVI. 9-17, XX7III. 29—36, LXXIX.
16—20.

120 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

indeed imitated the wonders, but were so far surpassed by
Moses and Aaron tliat they themselves became believers
in spite of the threats of Pharaoh. 1 But a mighty
judgment overtook Pharaoh and his people, who remained
stubborn in their unbelief ; and at last the Egyptians
were drowned in the sea, while the Israelites were saved.2
Nothing is related of the journey of the children of
Israel before the giving of the Law, except the striking
of the rock with the staff so that water flowei out, and
this comes in only incidentally in two passages ; ^ in the
former of which however other facts about the stay in the
wilderness are related. Moses then received the Law,4
and prayed to see God's glory. 5 During his absence the

1 Suras VII. 101—125, X. 76—90, XI. 99-102, XX. 50— 79, XXIII.
47—51, XXVI. 15— .52, XXVII. 13—15, XXVIII, 3G-40, XL. 24—49,
XLIII. 45-54, LXXIX. 20—27.

2 Siiras II. 46—47, VII. 127—139, X. 90—93, XX. 79—82, XXVI. 52—
69, XXVin. 40-43, XLIII. B5.

3 Suras II. 57, VII. 160.

* cV^S''( nin^bn S^ira VII. 142 and 149. On the first passage
Elpherar has : ^^jf^^ cV^^ -^y. u»W^ (Ji J^ " Ben 'Abbas says that
by Alwah he means the Torah ; " and on the second passage he says
more correctly : S\,yJ\ ^ ^\ " Wherein is the Torah."

* Suras VII. 135—147, 170, II. .52—55, 60, 87, IV. 152. In the Quran
Mount Sinai is never mentioned in connection with the giving of the law,
although it is so mentioned by commentators, e.g., Elpherar on VII. 140.
But it was not unknown to Muhammad, seeing that it is mentioned on

other occasions. Thus it is used as an oath in Sura XCV. 2 (jj.,iju-, j J=

probably on account of the rhyme. Compare y.j-,Q^). Again it is men-

s
tioned in the account of the creation of the olive tree. Siira XXIII. 20 :

"And a tree springing from the oL-,^ )»^," ™ which passage the commen-
tators cited by Elpherar take the name as an appellation. Among many
diverging explanations one is adduced which appears to me right, viz.,
)V«5i.S^ «_aiU3\ ijjUj-JU J» Js* 5 " ■"■* 's ^^^'^ ^^^^ ^" Syriac it means a
place thickly planted with trees ;" so that '"5''p would be connected with

DISPUTE WITH KORAH. 121

Israelites made the golden calf, which Moses on his return
dashed into pieces and gave to the Israelites to drink ; 1
and after that he appointed seventy men : ^ Later on ho
sent spies to Canaan, but they all except two were godless.
The people let themselves be deceived by them and in
consequence were obliged to wander for forty years in the
wilderness.^ Further, Moses had a dispute with Korah,
whom the earth swallowed up,4 and he was wrongly
accused.

This last statement may be either a reference to the
matter of Korah, or to the dispute with Aaron and Miriam.
These are the main events of Moses's life as they are
given in the Qurdn, and we have arranged them partly
according to the order of their mention in that book, but
more with reference to our better source. Besides all
this, a wonderful journey which Moses is said to have
taken with his servant ^ is given, about which, we shall
speak further on. To pass on now to details. Haman ^

nip- Compare Ben Ezra, who in his comment on Exodus, iii. 2 admits a
connection between ^yiD and nSD- It is to be noted that those mentioned
above who take Sinai as an appellation do not regard it as identical with
the mountain on which Moses received the Law, which identification
is merely cited as a possible view ; •

^j-y iJ^ tS'^y tS-^^ J<^^ y* -Mj t>J J^^ " Ben Zaid says that this is
the mountain from which Moses was addressed."

D'Herbelot (Biblio. Orient, under Sina, page 793) says : The Arabs
sometimes call this mountain Sinaini (;)«*-., (which however should be
/jU-. Sinini) with reference to its two peaks Horeb and Sina ; in this way
Sinina might perhaps be taken as the genitive of the Arabic word
Sinuna yy-*.

» Suras II. 48—52, 87, VII. 148-155, XX. 82-99.

2 Bura VII. 154. ' Sura V. 23—29.

* Sura XXVIII. 76-83. ' Sura XVIII. 59—81.

• yUUt Siiras XXVIII. 5, 7, 38, XXIX. 38, XL. 25.

122 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

and Korah I are mentioned as counsellors of Pharaoh and
persecutors of the Israelites. The latter is alluded to in
this capacity by the Eabbis,2 who say : " Korah was the
chief steward over Pharaoh's house." As to the former,
Muhammad must at some time have heard him mentioned
as' the Jew's enemy ,3 and therefore have put him in
here, although later Arabians do not thus designate the
Haman 4 yrho lived in the time of Ahasuerus. The Eabbis
also say a good deal about Pharaoh's advisers, amongst
whom they sometimes mention Balaam, Job and Jethro-
Of these the first agreed with Pharaoh and for this reason
he was afterwards killed by the Israelites ; the second
remained silent, therefore he had to endure sufferings ;
the third fled, and so the happiness of being the father-in-
law of Moses fell to his lot. The two chief magicians,5
who are also mentioned in a letter of the apostle Paul,
are specially named as abettors. Fear on account of some
dream ^ is given as the greatest cause of persecution ;
and this is in accord with the statement of the Eabbis that
it was foretold to Pharaoh by the magicians '^ that a boy
would be born who would lead the Israelites out of Egypt ;
then he thought, if all male children were thrown into the
river, this one would be thrown with them.8 The finding

• y^U Suras XXIX. S8, XL. 25. ' Midr. Eabb. on Numbers, par. 14.

* Not yt«^ but yj*jA. (oompare Makarizi in De Sacy's Chrest. Arabe.
page 143, line 9 of the first edition).

» N-)aa and >i3nV ' Sura XXVIII. 5.

' Pirke Rabbi Bliezer, Section 48.

' M-'^v s^ni ib^inb -i?3 Tn^ nij-iab n-iiatD-i.iin -i-iaiJ!
nnhbin bs Jis^ibtyn 'lab? i»i;!ii 3t»ni. on^aa bsTpi. ns
cnaj? "qbtpp s^m. nis^.n bsi D>-)yt,ri

THE KILLING OP AN EGYPTIAN. 123

of Moses is attributed to Pharaoh's wife,i and she is
mentioned as a believer,^ evidently having been confounded
with Pharaoh's daughter, by whom Moses was found
according to the Scriptures,^ and in the same way the
name * given to Pharaoh's wife by the commentators is a
corruption of the name ^ by which his daughter was known
among the Jews. The words of the Bible : " Shall I go
and call thee a nurse of the Hebrew women ? " ^ give rise
to the following Eabbinical fable : 7 " Why must the nurse
be a Hebrew women ? " This shows that he refused the
breast of all the Egyptian women. For God said : " Shall
the mouth that is one day to speak with me suck an unclean
thing ? " 8 According to Muhammad Moses regarded his
slaying of the Egyptian as sinful and repented thereof,^
which is contrary to the Jewish view,!" expressed as
follows ; " The verse in the 24th Psalm (according to the
reading of the Kethibh j * Who took not away his soul out
of vanity ') refers to the soul of the Egyptian, which Moses
did not take away, until he had investigated his case judi-
cially and had found that he deserved death." That the
Hebrew whom he released strove again on the following day
with an Bgyptian,ll and that he betrayed Moses, because he
would not uphold him, but on the contrary reproved him

1 Sdra XXVIII. 8. ' Sura LXVI. 11. ' Exodus, ii. 5.

* ^'S » Tl^n^ 1 Chron. iv. 18, ' Exodus, ii. 1.

' sotah 12, 2. b| b? ^n^-innntt? labp nvn^v s;?; na
•T<nvw iiB iV\rt u^-ia trii^n -nas;? pa; rib") ^bs ni»-i.:?jan

saa la'^T py^ >isv naib

° There is an allusion to this also in Sura XXVIII. 11.
' Suras XXVI. 19, XXVIII. 14.
1" Midr. Rabb. on Exodus, para. 5

3-nn iihw n.^a bttJ wp^ n.r itrgj s"it»b Ntoa rfb -i^y

nn'^a 2;n© nN"ni ^''la vbj? 7a^Kr is ''n!?an nn

" Sura XXVIII. H S.

124 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

for his quarrelsome temper is mere embellishment, as is
also the very Happy invention of a man who warned Moses
to flee.l There is a mistake to be found in the very brief
account of Moses' flight to Midian and his residence there,
for Muhammad speaks of two 2 instead of seven 3 daughters
of the Midianite. Instead of letting the vision in the
bush be the occasion of Moses' leaving Midian, as it is in
the Bible,4 Muhammad erroneously makes out that Moses
had formed the resolution to leave the country before this
event, and that the vision appeared to him on the way. 5
The appearance of Moses before Pharaoh is connected in a
remarkable way with the divine commission to the former.
So closely are the two circumstances bound together that
in many places Pharaoh's answer follows immediately upon
God's command, without its having first been mentioned
that Moses and Aaron had gone in obedience to God
to Egypt, had done wonders before Pharaoh and had
admonished him. But on the other hand in those passages
where only the admonitions given by Moses to Pharaoh are
related, "without the preceding events being given, the
part elsewhere omitted is of course supplied, but as we
might expect with changes. Pharaoh is said to have
reproached Moses with the murder of the Egyptian.^ This
is a very simple invention, which however is contrary to
the literal sense of the Scriptures,^ unless we accept the
Rabbinical explanation ^ of the words, " the king of Egypt
died," " that is, " he became leprous and a leper is as one
dead ; " and also of the words, " for all are died who sought

1 Sura XXVIII. 19. » Siira XXVIII. 28.

' Exodus, ii. 16. * Exodus, iii.

5 Sura XXVIII. 29. « Sura XXVI. 17 ff.

' Exodus, ii. 23. iv. 19. « Midi. Rabb. on Exodus, par. 1.

' ■ ^ ^ • • - T : • V • - : • '■,■•,■ T T -

^ ExoduB, ii. 23.

MIRACLES OP MOSES. 125

thy life " 1 which i3 as follows : " Were they dead ? They
were Dathan and Abiram, who were involved in the dispute
of Korah. This only means that they had become power-
less."* Further, Moses is supposed to have shewn the sign
of his leprous hand before Pharaohj2 which is not men-
tioned in Scripture,^ but which agrees with the following
statement in the Rabbinical writings : 4 " He put his hand
into his bosom, and drew it out as white as snow from
leprosy ; they also put their hands into their bosoms and
drew them out as white as snow from leprosy." The
magicians who were summoned asked at first, in distinction
from God's messengers, for their reward ; 5 but when they
had seen their serpents swallowed by that of Moses, they
believed, praised God and were not intimidated by Pharaoh's
threats. This is quite contrary to the Bible, in which
such a confession is found only after the plague of li'ce,^
and there too only in the form of a mere hint. Among
Moses' own people only his own tribe is said to have
believed on him,'' and the Rabbis say 8 that " the tribe of

^ Midr. Rabb, on Exodus, par. 5.

' Suras YII. 108, XXVI. 32. ^ Exodus, vii. 8 £E.

* Pirke Rabbi Eliezer, Section 48.

^D-ipn on 031 3bt^3 TOijisa nN^sim. ip^nb i"T; D>'a?n
3bt^3 nw-iisa onis ^N-'Sim Dp''nb ai^

V T - T ; T • : 't ■■ : tt

5 Suras VII. 110, XXVI. 40. ' Exodus, viii. 15.

' Sura X. 83, The suffix refers to Moses, as some Arabic com-
mentators cited by BaidMwi (Henzii Fragm. Arab, page 103) and by
Elpherar take it.

' Midr. Rabb. on Exodus, para. 6.

•^-iQ rilinsa tt^tj i^2Q ^b b:^ itaatjJ

• Accerding to Midr. Rabb. on Exodus, para 1, Dathan and Abiram were
the two disputants, one of whom reproached Moses with the murder of
the Egyptian,

126 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

Levi was exempt from hard labour." Pharaoh himself was
also a magician, and this he claims, according to my
opinion, in his address to the other magicians.! This is in
accord with the Rabbinical statement 2 that the Pharaoh
who lived in the days of Moses was a great magician. In
other passages of the Quran,3 Pharaoh claims for himself
divinity, which assumption no doubt is intended to be
accepted by the people. This trait is also developed in
Jewish legend,4 where we read : " Pharaoh said to them :
'Prom the first have ye spoken an untruth, for lord of
the world am I, I created myself and the Nile; as it
is written : 5 my river is mine own and I have made it
for myself.' " In another passage ^ Muhammad puts the
following words into Pharaoh's mouth : " Is not the
kingdom of Egypt mine and these rivers which flow
beneath me?" Blpherar, with others,^ remarks on the
words " beneath me," that they mean " by my command."
A quite new but charming fiction is that of a pious
Egyptian, who warned his countrymen not to despise the
teaching of Moses and not to persecute him.8 Certain
features of this story sound familiar. For instance, the
words in verse 29: "If he be a liar, on him will the
punishment of his falsehood light ; but if he speaketh the
truth, some of those judgments with which he threateneth
you will fall upon you," bear a resemblance to the words of

> Suras XX. 74, XXVI. 48. » Midr. Talkut, chapter 182.

TT T • : - ... " ■ TT V

3 S4ras XXVI. 28, XXVIII. 38. * Midr. Rabb. on Exodus, para. 5.

I . - . • : V - 'w T • ; • V T - T

... V • V : ■ : - • T T • *: - t t

5 Ezekiel, xxix. 8. 6 Sura XLIII. 50.

' O/*^ (;>~«53^ J^ " Al Hasan says by my command."
' Sura XL. 29 ff.

THE PLAGUES OF EGYPT. 127

G-amaliel in the New Testament. The allusion to Joseph
in verse 36 is found in a very dissimilar Jewish tradition,
as follows ; 1 "If Joseph had not been, we should not be
alive." Muhammad is not clear about the plagues. In
some passages 2 he speaks of nine plagues. In another
passage 3 he enumerates five, which stand in the following
order : Flood, Locusts, Lice, Frogs and Blood. Although
we cannot here find fault with the want of order ia the
plagues and with the omission of some of them since Mu-
hammad here is not, any more than is the Psalmist,* to be
considered as a strict historian, get the mistaken inclusion
of a flood, which is not to be confounded with the overthrow
in the sea,5 may fairly be considered as a proof of the
want of reliable information on the subject. The fear of
the Israelites 6 at the approach of the Egyptians by the
Red sea is also mentioned by Muhammad.^

Now we come to a circumstance, which is also taken from
Jewish legend, but which has been almost entirely misun-
derstood, from ignorance of its origin. The passage ^ may
be translated as follows : " And we caused the children of
Israel to pass through the sea, and Pharaoh and his army
followed them in a violent and hostile manner, until when
he was drowning, he said : ' I believe that there is no God
but He on Whom the Children of Israel believe, and I am
now one of the resigned ; ' on which God said, (or perhaps
this is to be read in the first person, so that this verse too
expresses Pharaoh's penitence, and the next verse begins
the expression of God's answer) ; ' Thou hast been
hitherto one of the rebellions and wicked doers. This

' Midr. Eabba on Exodns, para. 1

= Suras XVli. 103, XXVII. 12. ' Sura VII. 130.

* E. g. m Psalm, ov. 28 ff. ' first mentioned in v, 132,

* Exodus, xiv. 10 ff. ' Slira XXVI. 61 ff.
^ Sura X. 90 £E.

128 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

day, however will we save thee with thy body, that thou
mayest be a sign to those who shall be after thee.' " 1 This
is the quite simple meaning of the words, which has been
turned and twisted about by others, because they were
ignorant of the following Jewish legend : 2 " Eecognize
the power of repentance ! Pharaoh King of Egypt rebelled
excessively against the Most High saying : ' Who is God
that I should hearken to His voice ? ' 3 but with the same
tongue he repented saying : ' Who is like Thee, 0 Lord,
among the Gods ? ' * God delivered him from the dead, for
it is written : ' For now I had put forth my hand and

' Not one Arabic commentator among those qnoted in Blpherar appears
to have had a suspicion of the explanation given above, which is so well
suited to the words ; still it is not quite unknown to Baidhiwi. Along
with other explanations he gives (Henzii Fragm. Arab., page 201) the

following: ^^.f3\yu ^^ i£^^ 6^ u« L«./* o^ja;3 (iX,^^ji f*^^

'' And to-day we save thee i.e., we will bring thee back from where thy
people are sunk, — even from the depth of the sea, and we will put thee

on dry land." And farther on : ijy. %»\i •^■^. " Wiih thy body, i.e.,

whole and unharmed." But on the other hand the words : " That thou
mayest be a sign to those who shall come after thee," are explained by
him only in the ordinary way, via. that he should be a horror and a
warning to them.
° Pirke Rabbi Bliezer, Section 48.

-1^25 "na^ c.i'?'? "iT^5 n^-iga nn^tjJrin ns fyb siri
y\w\ iniw?!i iVip? rntjJN -it»« 'n -"n 'p.t^r Ysa n-z-^ry x\<hv^
'n □''bs^ nabs ia '?.t^ nn^E?^ nbr liEJba ia v(^r\w
nn? "'3 '?.t» na ^^xd T'.^m Dorian fsp 'r\ '-^ 'pn iV^rn
D>nan T«aa 'n 'a '^n ■"iTJpi'.ni. Tini« tiyj ""T-nsi "'nnbtt;
nt^T -)12]?5 nbiN"! '5^ iT'aiJ.ntr i^an^ innjina^ ins -isob

Gomp. also Midrash on Psalm, cvi. and Midr. Talkut, chapter 238.
3 Exodus, V. 2, * Exodus, xv. 11.

THE STRIKING OP THE EOCK. 129

smitten thee,' l but God let him live to proclaim His power
and might, even as it is written in Exodus, ix. 16."

On the occasion of the striking of the Eock Muhammad
makes twelve streams gush out, so that each individual
tribe 2 had its own particular stream. Apparently this is a
confusion of the events at Raphidim, where the rock was
struck,3 with those at Blim where the Israelites found
twelve wells.4 On these wells the commentator Eashi,
probably following earlier expositors says : ^ " They found
them ready for them, in number as the twelve Tribes."
When it came at last to the giving of the Law, the
Israelites are said to have rebelled ; but God threatened
them that He would overturn the mountain ^ upon them
if they would not accept the Law. The Jews also say
that God threatened to cover them with the mountain as
with a basin turned upside down.^ But now the Israelites
demanded that they themselves should see God ; they died
at the sight of Him, but were afterwards raised again.8
The corresponding Eabbinical statement may be trans-
lated as follows : 9 " The Israelites desired two things of

' EzodoB, ix. 15.

' il^\ J not ki!-. , although the twelve sons of Jacob are also called
Ulj—^V by Muhammad. Still in Sura VII. 160 LQ-Ll and ^^ are used
side by side in an entirely similar sense, so that one recognizes the
identical meaning of the two, and therefore one may with perfect right

translate LA as " tribe."

^ Exodus, xvii. 6.

* Exodus, XV. 27. Comp, also the two recensions of Jerusalem Targum.

* onb ^3a'^T3 ctanaj nisv Diat? laa?

6 Suras II. 60, 87, VII. 170.

7 Abodah Zarah II. 2. n>3i33 -inn-ns O^'^'bv •'3S nSS

8 Siira II. 52 fE. IV. 152.

' i^i2^ m^TW ''^'?'i?n ''5?^'? ''^l'?''; '^^^^ D''"!?'^ "'?.£?
=i3sin ]n '3^ ibip-riN i^vT^m ini25-nt»i r^ii ■i"'"'! i'^'ip =ii^»p:"i

130 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

God, that they might see His glory and hear His voice ; and
both were granted them, as it is written : 1 ' Behold the
Lord our God hath shewed us His glory and His greatness,
and we have heard His voice out of the midst of the fire.'
Then they had no power to bear it, for when they came to
Sinai and He appeared to them, their soul departed at His
speech, as it is written : 2 ' My soul went forth when he
spake.' The Law (the Torah) however interceded with
God for them saying : ' Would a king marry his daughter
and slay all his household ? ' The whole world rejoices
(on account of my appearance), and shall thy children
(the Israelites) die ? At once their souls returned to them,
therefore it is written : 3 ' The Law of the Lord is perfect,
restoring the soul.' " The story of the calf is also one
of those which Muhammad, following the Eabbis, has
found it easy to embellish. He says that the people would
have killed Aaron, if he had not made them a calf; 4
and the Eabbis say : ^ " Aaron saw Hur (who had wish-
ed to oppose them) killed ; then he thought : if I do not
listen to them they will do with me as with Hur."
According to another statement of the Qur^n^ one of

onb nbaai "«3''Db ^isati? i^s iiai?b nb nna ■n^'n rfbi mwn

V T T : • : ~ • : t v 't • ■■; ~ " v t t t ; •• t

bnw iiaia nsu"' •'trsa ':t» onaiy -la'^rtr bi? Dniat&a nms

T ": : ~ : t ; t • : - v v v t • •• . .. - ^ ^ . , t :t

N^t^a irba £»•' 'n''3!'pn "-aQbD O'^ian-i nn<h^ nt»p2 minn

i»a D'^na Tj\2a^ QTint?? ibs nbi5?n-b3 in''? •'^5« Tp^ ins

t^Q3 r\D>v!ra na-'Dn 'n m.in 'sttJ inaaJa n-nn

V T - • : T • : - TV ' T T : • T; t;

' Deuteronomy, v. 24 (Heb., v. 21). ^ Canticles, v, 6.
3 Psalm, xix. 8. * Sura VII. 150.

5 Sanhedrin 5 wb dS IClS Vapb ni3Tt» HilH nST ]brTS

n^nn masi? ''b •^lay sntE^n linb sarats

■;t t~t ' ; t;-t

Rashi makes the same remark on Exodus, xxxii, 4.
' Sura XX. 87, 90, 96.

THE WORSHIP OF THE CALF. 131

the Israelites, named Samiri,l led them astray and also
made the calf. This arose perhaps from Samael,^ the
name of one who is supposed by the Jews to have been
helpful at the making of the calf ; but at any rate the tale
has been differently developed by Muhammad. According
to him this was one of the Israelites who was present, and
whom Moses condemned to everlasting wandering,^ so that
he was compelled to say perpetually, " Touch not." 4 One
recognises that this legend is composed of different
elements. It is not foreign to Jewish tradition that
another Israelite, not Aaron, made the calf, and according
to one legend, Micah,^ who is mentioned in Judges, helped
in the making ;6 whence it comes that many Arabians
assert that Samiri and Micah are one and the same
person.^ Perhaps Muhammad formed the word Samiri
from a confusion with the name Samael.

Samiri was the name for Samaritan, and according to
the Arabians the Samaritans said, " Touch us not." 8 With
how much reason the Arabians hold this is indeed
unknown, perhaps only from confusion with a sect of the
Pharisees described as bad in the Talmud, where it is named
" The set-apart, touch me not ; " ^ but I have only a dim
recollection of the passage. In short the Samaritans were
certainly known to later Arabians by this name, and

^ Sura XX. 97. Compare the wandering Jew in the Christian legend.

* yLL^S ' Judges, xvii.

* Rashi on Sanhedrin 101. 2.

' Cf . Ahmad Ben Idris in Hottinger's Hist. Orient,, page 84.

' Cf. Makarizi (in De Sacy, Chrest. Arabe, i. 113 in the second edition,
189 in the first edition) : y^L_^ 5 y^^ ;^i3\ ^\ ji^j ^ and further :
S._. ,V .- !U^ ^jxS 8j/«LJ\ y\ |_j>^^\ .X*=.^ iji J*&.* CJ^J ^^ J^ °° which
passage De Sacy quotes the Sura, along with Baidhdwi's comment.

9 •"ijtr^ian bst u?^^?

132 JaDAISM AND ISLAM.

Muhammad doubtless knew them by it too ; and since he
gave the name of Samaritan l to the maker of the calf, this
man must have seemed to him to be the founder of the
sect, and the " Touch me not " must have originated with
him, which as a punishment was known to Muhammad
from the similar story of the wandering Jew. Muhammad
says that the caU lowed as it come forth.2 With this is to
be compared the Rabbinical statement : " There came forth
this calf 3 lowing, and the Israelites saw it. Eabbi Je-
huda says that Samael entered into it and lowed in order to
mislead Israel." 4 In the Quran it is said 5 that among the
people of Moses there was a tribe which kept to the truth.
This seems to refer to the tribe of Levi and especially to
their behaviour about the calf, although possibly it may
refer also to their belief in Moses's mission to Pharaoh of
which we have spoken before. In the biblical account a
statement is made,^ which is explained by the Eabbis as
follows : ^ " Prom Exodus, xxxii. 26, it is clear that the
tribe of Levi was not implicated in the matter of the
golden calf." The Arabian commentators produce the most
unedifying fables about this passage.

In the events which follow abbreviations are to be found,
but neither changes nor embellishments, except in the
story of the dispute with Korah, which gives rise to some.
Korah is said to have had such riches that a number of

' ^f-y^^ 2 stiras VII. 147, XX. 90.

' Exodus, xxxii. 24. ■• Pirke Rabbi BUezer, section 45.

-ins TTr\n\ ■^-sri ^vnb\ iniN ^n-i") nija ntn ba?n n:2».i

' Sura VII. 159. ^ Exodus, xxxii. 26.

' Pirke Rabbi Eliezer, section 45.

•'lb ^a?-b3 vb« ^5ps».i nanan -i3?i2?3

KOEAH. 133

strong men were required to carry the keys of his treasure-
chamber,! and the Kabbis tell us, 2 " Joseph buried three
treasures in Egypt, one of which became known to Korah.
Eiches kept by the owner to his hurt 3 may be applied
to the riches of Korah. The keys of Korah's treasure-
chamber were a burden for three hundred white mules."
It is implied in the same Talmudic passage that he became
overbearing and quarrelsome from the possession of such
riches, and Muhammad embellishes this idea in a fine
manner. One passage in the Qurdn may refer to this
dispute, for it says there that some persons had accused
Moses, but that Grod cleared him from the charge which
they had brought against him.4 Some of the commen-
tators also refer the passage to this event, while they bring
forward the following story, which we give in Elpherar's
words : 5 " Abu'l-' Allah says that it refers to the fact that
Korah had hired a bad woman, who accused Moses before
all the people of bad conduct with herself. God made her
dumb, cleared Moses of the accusation, and destroyed
Korah." This is actually supposed to have happened after
Moses had made known the law about adultery, and after
the enquiry as to whether it applied to him also had been
answered by him in the affirmative.^ The Eabbis also
allude to this in the following words : 7 " And when Moses

' Sura XXVIII. 76.

s mpb nbana nnw n'^-isaa nor ratan ni^aataa wbw

-r ; f- ; . - - . ; . ; I" I . : . . . . _ y

vibw •'•Vtsa nip bd iitpr ht ins-jb vbrab -i^aD -,tDV
nip \>w vpa n^2 ninjji^a ^in nia^b niins nina

3 Ecolesiastes, v. 12. '' Sura XXXIII. 69.

* Of. Abulfeda Hist. Anteislamica, page 32.

' isba raaj ns-iarr-na vas bv bs»i nt^a vkw'")

See Numbers, xvi. 4. 27''S niTSa ^n-n©nC£7

134 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

heard it, he fell on his face. What did he hear ? That he
was blamed for being intimate with the wife of another ; "
and in another passage we read : l " Bach man suspected
his wife on account of Moses." Other commentators
understand that the accusation was that Moses had killed
Aaron, because the two were alone together when Aaron
died on Mount Hor ; but Moses was cleared from this by
the angels, who produced Aaron's corpse.^ This is also a
Eabbinical idea, for we read in the Midrash Tanchuma : 3
" All the congregation saw that Aaron was dead.4 When
Moses and Bleazar came down from the mountain, the
whole congregation came together against them asking
them : ' Where is Aaron ?' They said : ' He is dead.' They re-
plied : ' How can the death angel come to a man who has once
resisted him and held him back ? for it is written : ^ He
(Aaron) stood between the dead and the living and the
plague was stayed. If you produce him, well ; if not, we
will stone you.' Moses then prayed : ' Lord of the world,
clear me from this suspicion.' Then God immediately opened

' Sanhedrin 110. ntSSD int»Nb SSp inS'bS

^ Elpherar has : S^\ ^ 655)^ uaUUJ ij\ &\i\ *JS.\jt>\ ^y JU .

Comp. Abulfeda Hist, Anteislamica, pp. 82 and 34, iX:^ A ^\ \^yu

* \^U U/> i)J[S\ l\pi

T T . V : V :t.'v ' t • ' ~: ~ t" * t •• t t ; •-

7'ins -{y^T} nnb ^nasi nn'^bp bni?n-b3 -iijapna -inn is
!?ia?b bin; n^an tjs'pa ■TTS''n n-b jii^n na onb ^las
n\-ian pa ii^'SlI ^^''O?^ "i"i?2?i nian tTHbaa la^tr Q-rsis
DN1 2Ma ini« psi"'?!? ur)^ dn noaan issni u^*r\r\ pig^
nasi nbQ;;i5 nt^a Tav n:»t» nnis? apns b^p: t^b
n"i^z?n-n^ 'n 'a 'ijn nna iia imnn ]a i3N''K'in 'r'aj'ai.
V-iq« ria ""S n-isn-b|i ^N-i*! 'p.to cnb "nsini

* Nambers, xx. 29. ' Numbers, xvi. 48, (Hebrew, xvii, 13,)

ACCUSATION AGAINST MOSES. 135

the grave and shewed Aaron to them, and to this refers the
passage : ' The whole congregation saw, etc' " Here I omit
entirely a third very insipid fahle which the commentators
'mention, and which seems to them to be the most probable
occasion of the verse, but I cannot trace it to any Jewish
source. The most correct view is, as Wahl has already
remarked, that the verse refers to the reproaches of Aaron
and Miriam.l In short the fifth verse of Snra LXI is
about the answer of Moses to the disputants. Here the
commentators give only the fable not quoted by us, just
because here, as in the second passage, they repeat only
the most universally accepted view. But this cannot
prevent us from holding to our opinion. Of the journey
described by Muhammad 2 I could not find a trace in Jewish
writings, although the colouring is Jewish.* Moses is said
to have gone with his servant to see the place where two
seas meet, and to have forgotten a fish, which they were
taking with them for food and which sprang into the sea.
When they went back to seek it, a servant of God met
them and made the journey with them, telling them before
hand that his actions would rouse their impatience. He
sank a ship, killed a youth and propped up a wall ; and
only when they parted did he give sufficient reasons for
these actions. The story following this about Dhu-'l-

' Numbers, xii. 1 ff. ^ Sura XVIII. 59—81.

* The author adds the following note in the Appendix :

Zanz (die gottesdienstliohen Vortrage der Juden, historisch entwickelt,
8. 130 u. Anm. d.) has pointed out the Jewish source of this story, in
which the servant of God according to the Arabians is said to be Elias
(cf . under Elias) ; only that, according to the Jewish source, the traveller
ia R. Joshua ben Levi, a man who plays a leading part in tales of marvel
and adventure (cf. Zuuz pp. 140 — 141) and whom this adventure suits
much better than it does Moses, who stands on too high a plane. We
may easily recognize therefore the Jewish origin of this legend, which has
been embellished quite after the manner of the Quran,

136 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

Qarnain 1 itiight well refer to Moses,, the shining one,2 if
anything of the sort were known about him.

Of the individual laws which are mentioned historically in
the Quran,3 only one, viz., that relating to the red heifer, 4*
affords material for a narrative, and that is given ^ in very
unnecessary fullness and with manifold errors. In the
first place Muhammad confounds the red heifer ^ with the
calf which is slain for one murdered by an unknown hand,^
and he also makes the dead man live again 8 on being
struck with a piece of the animal. In view of such great
distortions we must not deal hardly with him for the
following small one ; he says that the cow must be of one
year,^ in contradiction to the rabbinical statement that
she had to be a two-year old.io

As to those persons who come into the history of Moses,
we have already disposed of Pharaoh, Aaron and Korah,ll
while we have only mentioned others and therefore must
add more about'them. Miriam 12 is praised in the scripture
and called a prophetess,l3 but the Eabbis value her still
more highly and say of her : ^ " The angel of death had no
power over Miriam, but she died from the divine afflation,
and therefore worms could not touch her." According to

" J^^T^i, Sura XVIII. 82 ff. ^ Exodus, xxxiv. 29 ff .

' See Appendix. * Numbers, xix. 2 ff.

* Sura II. 63 ff. ^ Sura II. 67.

7 Deuteronomy, xxi. 2 ff. ' Sura II. 68.

9 y\^ Sura II. 63.

'" Vid. Midr. Rabb. on Numbers, para. 19. u /j»c J mji* wii^-

'^ f^~r •' nN35n

'* Baba Bathra, Vl.

^b"! nna ni:''^??? sb^ rmn tisba na lobts >^b Dnn

n^birii nan n^i tobEr

JETHKO. 137

Muhammad 1 Miriam is the mother of Jesus. 2 Although
Miriam's name is not mentioned in the passage where she
is alluded to in the history of Moses,^ yet there is not the
slightest doiibt that Muhammad took both Marys for one
and the same person; for the Talmudic utterance already
cited, viz., that Miriam did not die through the angel of
death, could easily be turned into a statement of a long,
if not endless, life for her, especially by Muhammad, who
treats chronology pretty much according to his own plea-
sure. The other person who appears in the history of
Moses is his father-in-law Jethro. Now it is true that his
name, like that of Miriam, is not mentioned in the story of
Moses,4 hence the Muhammadan tradition connects this
Midianite (as the Quran simply designates the father-in-
law of Moses) with Shu'aib, the Arabic name for Jethro, and
so they came to be considered as one and the same, not
however without more or less opposition. Thus Elpherar
says : 5 " Opinions are divided as to the name of Moses'
wife's father. Many say he was the prophet Shu'aib ;
others that he was Jethro the nephew of Shu'aib who died
before him ; others again that he was a man who believed
on Shu'aib." But the most widespread tradition is that it
was Shu'aib himself.

Thus Elpherar always calls him by this name, when
mentioning him in connection with these events and

^ J, > Cji - - ^-C

' y^jA> (jfco.\ J y\j*c u>ja\ fii^ Suras LXIV. 12, VII. 138.

' Cf . Sura III. title and verse 30 ff. ; Sura XIX. particularly verse 29 ;
Sura LXVI. 12, and Sunna 405.

3 Sura XXVIII. 10. ' Sura XXVIII. 28 £E.

* Elpherar on Sura XXVIII. 23.
..^s*.A ^ y— «J^j t^J—J^ J is)U-<i3\j .xfcU^ J^ai \^\, f^ ^ ^yiba.\ j
s-i*-«' t)^; s-***-*" o=^^ {^ '^ir'-y^ t^* -^e*-^ v-*|^ J^^ ,»«1- ,_s^\

138 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

Abulf eda l relates Just this one thing atout Shu'aib, viz.,
that he was the father-in-law of Moses, without giving any
other opinion. Though his name is not mentioned in this
connection in the Qur^n, other events independent of Moses'
life are related of him, particularly his admonition of
the Midianites, which is said by the Eabbis to have been
the cause of the hatred of that people towards him.2
Muhammad took up the admonition without mentioning the
consequence which it entailed on Jethro, viz., the driving
away of his daughters, which was just the circumstance
which led to Jethro's connection with the life of Moses.
According to Muhammad an immediate punishment fell on
the Midianites.3 The Eabbis have the following on the
subject: 4 "The priest of Midian had seven daughters.^
God hates idolatry and did He give Moses a refuge with an
idolater ? Concerning this our teachers tell us : Jethro was
priest of the idols, but knew their worthlessness, despised

' Hist. Anteislamica, page 80. ' Exodus, ii. 17.

3 Suras VII. 88—92, XI. 85—98, XXII. 43, XXV. 40, XXVI. 176—92,
XXIX. 35—6, XXXVIII. 12, L. 12—8.

* Midr. Rabb. on Exodus, para. 1.

n-iT mi35? S3» W:;i'prf t^bm m'33 vyaj rna mbb^

TT T -; " T 't ■" : T - v 'T : • • •- :

nn-'m n'bv -iDn^i ti?aa na rsts nNii 't 'v'h n>n -1:2^3

■• : ■ : T V T •■ • T ' ■• V T t: T -: - tt t

nnb -iMK'i in^v ''5?^ ^li^i. i^tp^ *^2 ^^^ ts nnwri ri^b^sh
D.?b ^nr?5 ''3« 117? nri^a cans! toat?a ^n^^^ji rtsav ts
>tir?v ban nnb in) \ 'v U7iati?n "-bs N^^im. -inN na:i3
nr-i^ f5b"i n^sba ib nbv^ ^bi Q"tm ib pb'^tt'' iihw ^n^-^ai

V : • : T T : v ~: ~ : tt r i., -; . .. . .

'ibsi? ^bi. '"lat}!? riM ib nis-ib Q'^v'mi ]p t£7i73ii ia^^-nw

n^'tti-jaj? D'^vbn'! i;"[a )^^'^ mn nuJDN Q^itriaM Q'^v'-iri -iNh*!.

rni35 =it»i?.'i '\m^^w n-rabb sbsi r;ii33

* Exodus, ii. 16.

JKTHEO. 139

idolatry and had thouglit of being converted even before
Mose3 came. Then lie called his fellow-townsmen and
said to them : ' Till now I have served you, but now I am
old, choose you another priest : and he gave them back the
vessels of service.' Then they put him under a ban, so that
no one conversed with him, no one worked for him, no one
tended his flocks; and when he asked this service from the
shepherds; they would not give it. The shepherds came
and drove them away, l Was it possible ? Jethro was the
priest of Midian and the shepherds drove away his daugh-
ters ? But this shews that they had put him under a ban,
and for this reason they drove his daughters away." In the
mouth of the people, or more probably from Muhammad
himself, the legend received the embellishment that Jethro
wanted to convert his fellow-countrymen to the faith, and
that they were punished on account of their unbelief. A
reproach which is specially brought against them, or rather
the point of the exhortation, viz., to give just weight and
measure,^ must be founded on some legend or other,
although I have not yet come across it in Jewish' writings.3
Jethro shows himself as a preacher quite according to
Muhammad's ideas. He preaches about the Last Day * and
asserts that he desires no reward ; 5 on the other hand his
townspeople reproach him with working no miracles.^ I
have presented the facts and quotations here as though
there were no doubt that all these passages refer to .Jethro,
but exception might be taken to this. An altogether
different name "^ is found in the Quran, and it is not easy to

> Exodus, ii. 17. ' Siiras TIT. 83, XI. 86.

' It seems as though Muhammad had confounded the Midianites with
the inhabitants of Sodom, to whom such things are imputed by the
Rabbis.

« Sura XXIX, 35. ' Sura XXVI. 180.

« Sura XXVI. 186, 187, ' 4-^

140 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

explain how Jetliro came by it. However, we must first try
to shew that Shu'aib and .Jethro are identical, and then put
forward our conjectures as to how the many-named .Jethro
added this name to his others. The identity is first shewn
by the fact that those to whom he was sent are called
" Midianites ; " 1 in the second place, the two first passages 2
give the events concerning him between the story of Lot
and that of Moses.

Now if we can find among the Eabbis any intimation
favourable to this supposition, then nothing important will
remain to oppose its adoption ^ as a probable hypothesis.
Very little, however, can be adduced to shew how Shu'aib
and Jethro came to be one and the same person. Muham-
mad may have confused the name Hobab 4 — often used for
Jethro and probably pronounced Chobab — with Shu'aib.
Perhaps an etymological explanation may be thought of
here, for the Eabbis assert that the staff used later by
Moses and called the divine staffs grew in .Jethro's garden.^
Now Sha'ba ^ means staff and Shu'aib * may be taken as the
possessor of the staff. If Shu'aib is the same as Jethro,

> Sflras Til. 83, XI. 85, XXIX. 35. ((^li), XXII. 43 (^.li >L\^\^
where (^jJ» is regarded as the name of a town).
5 Siiras VII. 88—92, XI. 85—98.

' It is all very well for Ahmad ben As Sah'm (quoted by Maraeo. on
Sura VII. 83.) to assert that this is the opinion of Jlg«J\ y^ iijU,^ " a heap
of fools." Some regard Jethro, as the father of Shu'aib, (as Elpherar on
Stira VII. 83 : y^j ^^ ..,..,5^ yj Jji ^ ). others, as his nephew (of. the
passage quoted above from Elpherar on Sura XXVIII. 23.). The differ-
ence in the names confuses the commentators, and also their ignorance
of the source from which here, as often, Muhammad drew.

* 33in 5 D'^n-bsn nan

^ That Moses obtained the staff from Jethro is asserted also by D'Herb
B. 0. under the word Shu'aib, p. 772, according to the Mu^ammadan view."

shb'aib. 141

there are passages 1 in which the former is mentioned,
while those to whom he is sent are not called Midianites ;
and so we find a new name for these people, 2 viz., " men
of the wood," 3 which name is evidently derived from the
thorn bushes (nap) which were in the vicinity.

It remains for us to justify the briDging forward of two
more passages, 4 and it is all the more difiicult for us to do
so, because in order to prove our point we must accuse
Muhammad himself of a misunderstanding. In these pass-
ages Shu'aib is not mentioned, but the people who are held
up as a warning are called " men of the well," 5 without
any other particulars being given about them. But further
these "men of the well"^ are mentioned in one passage
along with the " men of the wood," and so it seems certain
that Muhammad regarded them as two different peoples ;
but nevertheless we allow ourselves to believe them to be
really identical.

The real reason for bringing Jethro into the Qurdn is,
as we have already remarked, the quarrel of the shepherds
with his daughters, although the fact itself is not men-
tioned in that book ; and it is thus easy to understand that
the Jews may have sometimes called the Midianites by this
name i.e., " men of the well." No other circumstances
related about these persons mentioned in the Qurd,n would
authorize this appellation. The story of Jacob at the
well (setting aside the fact that not the slightest allusion

J E.g. Siira XXVI. 176 ff. ' ii^lTC'^^

' Blpherar on Sura VII. S3 has : l^'i\ <-jUr^\ (•Jij (^-i^ ; but this same
Elpherar will not allow this with regard to Sura XXVI. 177, because in
connection with Midian Sha'aib is mentioned as ^^\ their brother,

which is not the case with the iio S \ v'«^', " people of the wood."

♦ Suras XXV. 40, L. 12. * J,]i\ 4>'^^

' Sura L. 12.

142 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

to it is to be found in the Quran,) has in it no trace of
hostility ; andso the conjecture is not too daring that, as
a matter of fact, all these three,^ viz., the Midianites, the
people of the wood, and the people of the well, are the
same, but that Muhammad regarded the first two only as
identical and looked on the last as different. Still this
tradition seems to have been received even among the
Arabs, for we find in Blpherar 2 among other explanations
the following : " Wahb says that the people of the well
sat beside it (the well), and the shepherds served idols.
Then God sent Shu'aib, who was to exhort them to Isld,m,
but they remained in their error, and continued their
eilorts to harm Shu'aib, While they sat round the well in
their dwellings the spring bubbled up and gushed over
them and their houses, so that they were all ruined." In
like manner Jaldlu'd-din says : 3 " Their prophet is called
by some Shu'aib, by others differently." This admission of
the Arabic commentators strengthens our opinion con-
siderably. Another person of some importance in the
Mosaic age is said by some Arabic commentators to be
alluded to in the Qurdn,4 but many others dispute the
allusion. Blpherar quotes four different opinions on this
passage. The first opinion is that it refers to Balaam,
for which he quotes many authorities, and relates the
history of Balaam in almost complete accord with the

2 Oq Sura XXV. 40. v_>U^\^ Igjj. Jyujij Jjs\ \y\r ._ji^ JU
J>\ i^ft^, (,1 5\ (Oc L-*i Jv;y: <>JJ\ <M.y (>\j^'i\ tj^J^JO ^\y

' On Sura XXV. 40 (vid. Maraoc.) 6j^ Jji^ s-s*4i J-i .j. j
* Sura Til. 174—5.

SAUL. 143

Bible narrative.l Jaldlu'd-dln and Zamakhshari 2 refer
this to Balaam, and call him Balaam the son of Ba'ura.3
Beyond these no other persons who come into the life of
Moses, or who were important in his time, are mentioned,
and thus our second part comes to an end.

Second Section.

Chapter II.

Third Part.

The three hings who ruled over undivided Israel.

The history following immediately on the time of Moses,
including the time of the Judges, must either have seemed
to Muhammad unedifying, which is improbable, as the
story of that heroic age was quite in accord with his feelings
and aims ; or else it must have been wholly unknown to
him, and this appears to have been the case from the fact
that he speaks of the choosing of a king as an event
happening after Moses,4 in terms which can only mean
immediately or very soon after Moses. Saul stands very
much in the back ground ; for on the one hand his history
was known to Muhammad only in a very abbreviated form,
and on the other hand the Prophet had such an undefined
notion of Saul's personality that he attributes to him the
actions of others. Saul's history is related in the Qur£n 5
in the following manner : " After Moses the Israelites
desired a king, in order that they might go out under him
to the Holy War ; ^ to which however only a few of them

' Blpherar calls him, following some authorities, j»;lc im axI: • and
following others, jcVj (^ ,»*1}.

^ Maraoc. on the passage. ' h)^^ tJ* (**^

* Sura II. 247. ^y^ ■^ (^ ' Sfira II. 247—53.

* 1 Samuel, viii. 20.

144 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

afterwards went. The prophet (Samuel) gave out that
Saul was sent of God, still he seemed despicable in the eyes
of the people. 1 As a sign that the rule pertained to Saul,
the prophet of Israel announced the return of the Ark of
the Covenant. Saul then proved his troops, and allowed
only those to belong to his army who drank water lapping
it with the hand; this was done by very few, and even
these were afraid of Goliath and his armies. David at
length overcame the Philistine and his hosts and gained the
dominion." The circumstance that through Saul the j^rk of
the Covenant came back ^ is contrary to Scripture, accord-
ing to which the Ark came back earlier. The story of
Saul's proving his troops is evidently a confusion with that
of Gideon, concerning whom this is related in the Bible,3
and has doubtless risen from the similar story of Saul's
•forbidding food to the army .4 This confusion with Gideon
accounts too for the saying that only a few mighty men
followed Saul. The name of the prophet is not given, and
later Arabians also are in ignorance about it. 5 Saul is
called Talut,6 a name probably given on account of his
height.^ Muhammad notices in the Quran that Saul was
of great height,^ and Baidhdwi gives this derivation for
his name. Goliath is called Jdlut.^ The personality of
David 10 is certainly more clearly grasped in the Qur^n,
but the actual historical events of his life are scarcely
touched upon. David's victory over Goliath is mentioned

' 1 Samuel, x. 27.

' Sura II. 249 must be thus understood, and perhaps it would also be
better to read uuybS\ A^k here,

' Judges, vii. 6 fE. * 1 Samuel, xiv. 24 ff.

' Baidhawi says : J»^^ }^ (?(jj .^t S) yja*A j\ ^j> yfc j
* uujSVE probably derided from JIlT to be tall.
' 1 Samuel, ix. 2, *, 23. * Sura II. 248.

DAVID. 145

incidentally in the history of Saul. Again^ the story of
David and Bathsheba is only distantly alluded to, in that
(setting aside the passage l in which he is called
" Penitent " probably with reference to her) the parable of
the case in law devised by the Prophet Nathan 2 is
narrated,^ and to it is added* that David perceived that
this was a sign ; and after he had repented, he was received
back into favour by God. According to the Qurin the
case in dispute is not related by the prophet, but the two
disputants themselves come before David. In another pas-
sage 5 mention is made of David's and Solomon's excellent
judgment on the occasion of some quarrel unknown to us
about shepherds tending flocks on strange fields at night.
A remarkable circumstance is given in several passages,^
where it is stated that David compelled the mountains and
the birds to praise God with him, which, as Wahl rightly
remarks, owes its origin to David's poetical address to all
creatures, in which address he imagines them endowed
with life and reason, and calls on them to join with him
in extolling the Almighty. According to the Qurdn^
mankind is indebted to David for the invention of armour.
This legend probably arose from David's warlike fame,
although there is much said in the Bible about Goliath's
armour. In another passage ^ we find a general mention
of David. In one of the Sunnas^ it is mentioned that
David did with very little sleep ; and Elpherar 10 in a long
chain of tradition beginning with Ibn 'Abbas and ending

1 Sura XXXVIII. 16. >_»^j\ ' Samuel, xii. 1 fe.

3 Sura XXXVIII. 20—3. * Sura XXXVIII. 23—6.
5 Sura XXI. 78.

« Suras XXI. 79, XXXIV. 10, XXXVIII. 16—20.

7 Sura XXI. 80. ' Sura XXVII. 15.

9 Sunna 148. '" On Sura XXXVIII, 16.
T

146 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

with 'Amru, says : 1 " The Apostle of God said : ' (David)
slept half the nightj rose for a third, and then slept again
for a sixth.' " The Rabbis also speak of this, on the
strength of the 2 verse, "At midnight I will rise to give
thanks unto Thee," and they assert that David used to
sleep only during sixty respiration s.3 David is also known
to Muhammad as the author of the Psalms.4 The affair
of the Sabbath-breakers, who were punished by being
changed into apes, is also supposed to belong to the time
of David, but the circumstance is mentioned ^ only in
general terms, and nothing definite is given about time or
details, except in verse 82, where the time is given, but not
the fact. Among the -Jews there is no trace of this legend.
The life of Solomon^ is in itself unimportant, and it
is only the wisdom for which he is famed in the Bible
which makes him the hero of the whole East, one might
therefore expect to find much more about him in the
Quran than really exists there. Muhammad speaks of his
wisdom,? and especially brings forward the fact that
Solomon understood the language of the birds. This is
also asserted by the Eabbis, and is founded on the Biblical

statement : § "He spake of trees and birds." The

winds 9 also performed his will, and the Genii were found
in his following ; 1" this is also related, e.g., in the second

' &-A- (.Vu,, &iU' ^yi;^ JJ!\ Uui ^U JjW (i\i ^ m J^j JU
» Palms, cxix. 62. 3 -^pm )>P\^ (Beraohoth).

* jjjj Suras IV. 161, XVII. 57.

* Suraa II. 61, IV. 50, V. 65, VII. 166.

* t)^*<^ ' Sura XXVII. 16, 16.

8 1 Kings, V. 13. fi'wn b^;i Q>???n \>v naTi

j>jj here probably means the spirits of the air, like ninil
'" Suras XXI. 81, 82, XXXIV. 11, 12, XXXVIII. 35-9.

SOLOMON. 147

•

Targum on the Book of Esther,! thus : " To him were
obedient demons of the most diverse sorts, and the evil
spirits were given into his hand." This legend is derived
primarily from a mistaken interpretation of a passage in
Ecclesiastes.2 Muhammad relates the following tale : 3
"On one occasion the lapwing * was not found in attend-
ance on Solomon, and the Eng regarding him as a truant
threatened to kill him. Then the lapwing came with the
news that he had discovered a land as yet unknown to
Solomon, which was not subject to him, the land of Sheba,
in which the people together with the Queen worshipped
the sun. Solomon sent the bird back with a letter summon-
ing these people to adopt the belief in the Unity of God,
He himself went thither at once with his troops, and had
the Queen's throne brought to him by a ministering angel.
The Queen had been already converted, and she came into
Solomon's camp ; he had her brought before him into a
hall, of which the flooring was glass, and she imagining it
to be water, exposed her legs." This same story is to be
found in the Targum 5 already referred to, together with
some other circumstances which I shall omit here. The
story runs as follows : " Thereupon the partridge was
sought and not found among the birds, and the King
commanded angrily that it should be fetched, and he
wanted to kill it. Then the partridge answered the King :
' My lord and King, attend and hear my words, for three
months I considered and flew about the whole world to
find the town where thou wast not obeyed. Then I saw a
town in the East called Kitor, where there are many

• On Esther, i. 2.

' Ecoleaiastes, ii. 8. n'i'^E?1 TT^W

3 Sura XXVII. 20—46. * Ifclc

' Second Targum on the Book of Esther.

148 JUDAISM AND ISlIm.

people, but a woman rules over them ; she is called the
Queen of Sheba. If it please thee now, my lord Bang,
I will go to that town and bind the Queen with chains
and its nobles with iron fetters and bring them all here.'
And it pleased the King, and Scribes were called who
wrote letters and bound them to the wings of the
partridge. When the bird came to the Queen she saw
the letter tied on to its wing, she opened it, and these were
the contents : ' Prom me, Solomon the King, greeting to
thee and to thy princes ! Thou knowest well that God hath
appointed me King over the beasts of the field and
the birds of the heaven, and over the demons, spirits
and spectres of the night, and that the kings of all the
countries under heaven approach me in submission. If
thou also wilt do this, great honour will be shewn thee ;
if not, then I will send against thee kings and legions and
horsemen. The kings are the beasts of the field; the
horsemen, the birds of the air ; the armies, demons and
spirits; while the legions are nightmares, which will
strangle you in your beds.' When the Queen had read this,
she rent her clothes and sent for the elders and lords and
said: 'Doyouknow what King Solomon has sent me?' They
said : ' We neither know him, nor heed him.' But the Queen
did not trust them, but called for ships and sent presents
to the king, and after three years she went herself. When
the king heard that she had come, he seated himself in a
glass room. She thought the king was sitting in the
water, and bared herself to go through it. When she saw
his magnificence, she said : 1 ' Blessed be the Lord thy

God, which delighted in thee, to set thee on the throne

to do judgment and justice.' " We must forgive Muhammad
the two slight changes he makes in the story, viz., that
he turns the matter from one of government into one of

' 1 Kings, X, 9.

SOLOMON. 149

religion, and that lie begins the letter l with the words : " In
the name of the Merciful Grod/' Solomon huilt the Temple
also by the help of the spirits, who even went on building
after his death, while he remained sitting on his throne till
a worm gnawed him,2

Once when Solomon became arrogant he was driven
from the kingdom, and a spirit reigned in his stead until
he repented.3 The Sanhedrin 4 gives the following brief
account : " At first Solomon reigned even over the exalted
ones, as it is written : 5 Solomon sat on the throne of the
Lord J but afterwards only over his own stick, as it is
written : ^ What profit hath man of all his labour ? and
further,^ this was my portion from all my labour." 8 When
he repented, he gave up his useless extravagances, and
had his horses disabled,^ to which the following passage
alludes : 1" " It is wisely ordained that the reasons for the
commandments are not given; they were given in two

1 ,»«^\ (p^\ MJ\ ,, > Sura XXVII. 30.

2 Sura XXXIT. 13. Cf. on this point Gittin, 68.

3 Sura XXXVIII. 33—5. ■* Sanhedrin, 20.

niMb ^i-in^na 'a.fi? ibi?a b? Nb« trba ^5b JiiDsbi. 'n sbs
"'ba^j-bsa "-pbH n-'n nt nTiai ibaij-bna

• T -; T • '•:•.• TT V • : T -; t :

^ 1 Chroniolea, xxix. 23. ^ Ecolesiastes, i. 3.

' Eoclesiastes, ii. 10.

* Cf. also Midr. Rabba on Numbers, par. H ; on Canticles, iii. 4 ; and on
Ruth, ii. 14.
9 Sura XXXVIII. 29—32. " Sanhedrin, 21.

nbin? rn's"5pa latp nno; rrfn >atp ^bina t5b-n» •'pQia
nipTO ib nan.! ^b ''^v^ cbirn bin? in^ ''^5?"! I^^St
nn^aa n^si.a bw\ 3''n?!i y^wi^ iib) na-iN rtbbts naw

nisa tow^a.

150 JUDAISM AND I3LAM.

cases, and one of the greatest of men sinned. For it is
written : 1 The king shall not multiply horses to himself,
nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that
he should multiply horses. Then Solomon thought, I will
get me many horses and not send to Egypt; but it is
written : 2 And a chariot came up and went out of Egypt
for six hundred shekels of silver." A story about spirits,
which is said to have happened in Solomon's time,^ has
already been mentioned in connection with Noah. A story
about the ants, which fled before Solomon's army, is
related in the Qur£n,4 and remains to be noticed. It is
evidently founded on the verse,^ " Go to the ant thou

sluggard and be wise ; " and based on this same

foundation we have a beautiful fable in the Talmud,^
but I could find there no trace of the story given in the
Qur^n.

The story of the lapwing ^ has gained a firm foot hold in
Arabic legend, and a pretty myth about the bird is found
in Fakihat Blcholafa.8 For Muhammad there were no very
important personages between Moses and Jesus ; and such
as he does mention he merely alludes to. This is not to
be wondered at when Solomon, the wise man of the East,
who is endowed with all manner of legendary adornment
comes, comparatively speaking, so little before us in the
Quran.

' Deuteronomy, xvii. 16. ^ i Kings, x. 29.

3 Sura II. 96. * Sura XXVII. 18-

5 Proverbs, vi. 6 £E. « ChuUin, 51. 2.

' ABji 8 Page 91,

noly men aftek the time 01' solomon. 151

Second Chaptek.

Fourth Part.

Holy Men after the time of Solomon.

Many important men might be mentioned here, but
Muhammad knew but few of them, and about those whom
he does name he gives for the most part nothing special,
but mentions them only with other pious persons. Some
only are treated with a little more detail, and we will
mention them here first, so as then to put the others
together briefly. Of Elijah i his dispute with the people
about the worship of Baal is related briefly. In tho
legends of Islam as well as in those of later Judaism
Elijah plays a very important part. He is that mystical 2
person known under the name of Khizr. He is therefore
the same as Phinehas,^ erroneously called by some the
nephew of Aaron ^ instead of his grandson, and, like
Elijah the prophet 5 in later Jewish traditions, he is the
mediator between heaven and earth. It is he who appears

' J«C5^ Suras YI. 85, XXXVII. 123. In one place he is called

j^UJ\ (Sura XXXVII. 30) on account of the rhyme. We find among
other opinions in Blpherar the following :

" It is said that Ilyasin is a dialectic change for Elyas, as Ism'ail for
Ism'aln and Mikhayil for Mikhayin.'' These examples are certainly
nnsuitablei for in them the change is only from J to ^ , while here the
complete addition of the syllable yi — takes place. This the Arabs,
in spite of the similar M-ji-. mentioned before, seem to shrink from
explaining as a change deliberately made on account of the rhyme.

152 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

to the pious under the most varied forms, who visits the
schools, and imparts to famous teachers that which God
communicates about this or that opinion expressed by them.
The Muslims too know him in this capacity, and they
recognize him in the servant of God who proposed himself
as a travelling companion to Moses,l and in these actions
they have the prototype of his ministry as one who appears
in a miraculous manner, has intercourse with men in human
fashion, and performs incomprehensible actions which
only receive true significance through knowledge which is
hidden from man.

Jonah is mentioned in several passages of the Qur4n.2
His mission to Nineveh, his being swallowed by the fish,
his rescue from it, and the story of the gourd which shaded
him, are all given very briefly.^ Job's * sufferings and
healing are mentioned in two passages,^ and in the latter
passage Muhammad adds that Job produced a cooling
and refreshing fountain for himself by stamping on the
earth. We know of no parallel passage to this in the
Rabbinical writings.

We come now to a passage ^ hitherto wrongly referred
which translated runs thus :

" Slain were the men of the pit of the burning fire.
When they sat around the same,

And were witnesses of what was done to the true believers,
and they wished to punish them only because they
believed in the mighty and Glorious God, " &c.

1 Siira XVIII. 59-82.

a JJ^ Siiraa VI. 86, X. 98, XXXVII. 139, XXI. 81 (^^ ,S , LXVIII.

3 S&aa X. 98, XXI. 87—8, XXXVII. 189—149, LXVIII. 48—51.

* V>^\ * Suras XXI. 83—4, XXXVIII. 40-5.

« Sura LXXXV. 4 ff.

THE THREE WITNESSES. IBS'

Commentators make this refer to the punisliment of a
Jewish Himyarite King who persecuted the Christians,
but the appellation "believers" as applied to Christians
has no parallel elsewhere in the Quran, no detail bearing
on this event is mentioned, and just this one form of
persecution (burning) is not given by the martyrologists.

If we compare the passage with the story of the three
children 1 all fits in perfectly.

The three believers would not bow themselves before an
idol, and were thrown into the fiery furnace ; those who
threw them in were slain by the heat and the believers
were saved. Evidently Muhammad here alludes to this.2

It is possible that there is an allusion to the story of
the revival of the dry bones 3 in a passage of the Qur£n,4
which tells us that many who left their habitations for fear
of death were slain by God, but were afterwards restored
to lif e.5 The Talmud treats the narrative given in Ezekiel
more in detail.^

Another biblical reference may perhaps be found in

1 Daniel, iii. 8 fe.

^ An intimation that this passage refers ta this circumstance is given
by the Arabian commentator Mnqatil (cited by Elpherar), in that he
asserts that there were in fact three "people of the burning fiery pit "

(j,jkiS\ <-jV^o\V and of the pits one was in (j^jU , i. e. Persia, and
indeed under -aj ts-^aJ Nebuchadnezzar ; but he adds : U^ iii\ Jjju aJ«
\i\J God revealed nothing in the Sura about this or about the other
event which took place in Syria, bnt only revealed about the one under
Dhu-nawas. But this intimation is enough for the strengthening of our
opinion.

3 Ezekiel, xxxvii. * Sura II. 244.

* The Arabian commentators know of this bat dimly, for Ismail Ben 'Ali
gives out in the name of Ibn Talib that this event took place in the time
of the Judge (?) J««j=», «.s- Ezekiel, who came after (j«\,y.y>, the' sod of
Caleb, in this office. (Maraco ; Prodr. IV. 83.)

* Sanhedrin 92.

164 JUDAISM AND ISlXh.

tho words : ' " Dost thou not see how thy Lord stretches
(lengthens) out the shadow when he will, makes it quies-
cent, then sets the sun over it as an indicator." This I
think is perhaps an allusion to the sign given to Hezekiah.2

We find more in the Quran about Ezra,3 if not about his
history, yet about the way in which the Jews regarded
him. According to the assertion of Muhammad the Jews
held Ezra to be the Son of God.* This is certainly a mere
misunderstanding which arose from the great esteem in
which Ezra was undoubtedly held. This esteem is expressed
in the following passage : ^ "Ezra would have been worthy
to have made known the law if Moses had not come before
him." Truly Muhammad sought to cast suspicion on the
Jews' faith in the unity of God, and thought he had here
found a good opportunity of so doing.

This utterance as an expression of the Jewish opinion
of that time loses much in value when we consider the
personality of that Phineas the son of Azai'iah, to whom it
is attributed.

In the traditions of Isl^m there is a great deal about
Ezra as the compiler of the Law. In this character also

3ura XXV. 47—8.

8 2 Kings, XX. 9—12. 3 ^^c

The Arabian grammarians dispute as to whether the word should
receive a nnnnation or not, but it seems to me that the omission of it is
more suitable to the form of the word which is like a diminutive.
Several of the Arabians regard this as correct.

* Sura IX, 30, Suuna, 462.

In D'Herbelot (under the word " Ozair " page 691) much is adduced
from Muslim commentators and historians to explain this passage, which
however, in harmony with the Talmud, only asserts Ezra's renewing of
the Law.

^ Sanhedrin 21-. 2.

in^i? sb NbiaV» ii; bv_ n-iin ^nsritj? sn^? ti:^ti ^ns-^

KZEA. , 155

lie comes before us in Scripture, and the Jews believed tbis
of him ; so tbe probability becomes great that Muhammad,
on the one hand, intentionally exaggerated, and, on the
other hand, eagerly caught up the hasty and mocking
utterance of some individual to prove this point against
the Jews.

The Arabian commentators according to Maraccius l
refer another passage in the Quran 2 to Ezra, namely, the
one where it is related of some person that he passed by a
ruined city and doubted if it could ever be restored. God
let him die for one hundred years, then revived him and
imparted to him the assurance that one hundred years had
gone by, while he believed that but one day had passed.

The proof was that his food and drink had perished and
his ass was mouldering away. Then behold ! God put
together the bones of the animal and clothed them with
flesh, so that the man acknowledged : " God is mighty
over all." The fable is derived, as Maraccius rightly
observes, from the ride round the ruined city of Jerusalem
made by Nehemiah,3 vvho is often confused with Ezra.

Two other Biblical characters are merely mentioned :
Elisha4 in two passages,^ and each time strangely enough
immediately after Ishmael ; and Dhn'l-Eifl,^ who according
to his name which means the nourisher, and from the fact
related of him that he nourished a hundred Israelites in
a cave, must be Obadjah.^ Perhaps however he may be
Bzekiel, who according to Niebuhr s is called Kephil by the
Arabs.9

» Prod. iv. 85, ^ Sura II, 261.

3 Nehemiah, ii. 12 £f. * £— s^^

5 Suraa VI. 86, XXXVIII. 48. * Suras XXI. 85, XXXVIII. 48,

'' 1 Kings, xviii. 4. ^ Reisebesolireibung II. 266.

' According to Khondemir (D'Herbelot Bibl. Orient, under Elisha ben
Akhtbob) Dbu'1-Kifl was a follower of Elisha, but Obadiah waa contem-
porary with Elijah.

1 56 JUDAISM AND ISLAM.

Now all the historical allusions have been put together,
and when we examine them we see unmistakably in them
the verification of the hypothesis which we laid down at
the beginning — namely, that Muhammad borrowed a great
deal from Judaism, that he learned that which he did
borrow from oral tradition, and that he sometimes altered
it to suit his purpose. We have tried to shew in the first
part that external circumstances must have raised in
Muhammad the desire to borrow much from Judaism, that
he had the means thereto within his reach, and that other
circumstances, particularly his own main aim, offered no
obstacle to, but rather fitted in with such a borrowing.
In the second part, we have attempted to show that
Muhammad really did borrow from Judaism, and that
conceptions, matters of creed, views of morality, and of life
in general, and more especially matters of history and
of traditions, have actually passed over from Judaism into
the Quran.

And now our task is practically ended. If a thorough
demonstration has been made of all these points, then
the questions as to whether Muhammad did borrow from
Judaism, and what and how he so borrowed, have been
sufficiently answered. Now, as a supplementary note we
add a summary of the passages in which Muhammad's
a'ttribute towards Judaism seems to be negative and even
hostile. Some of these passages oppose Judaism, some
abrogate laws binding on the Jews, and some allude to
Jewish customs without imposing them upon the Arabs.
But since we consider the question, the answer to which
forms the subject of our theme, as now fully answered,
without giving the results of further investigation, we
therefore do not give these results as a part of this work
itself, but add them as an appendix.

157

APPENDIX.

Statements in the Quean hostile to Judaism. ""

Just as we tried before to shew from the personality of
Muhammad and from the spirit of his time that borrowing from
Judaism had taken place, even so we wish here to shew that
statements hostile to Judaism are to be found in the Quran.
Muhammad's aim was to bring about a union of all creeds, and
no reb'gious community stood more in the way of the attainment
of this end than the Jews with their many cumbersome laws,
unknown to other religions. Further, Muhammad's aim was
to establish in and through this union such religious doctrines
only as were in his opinion purified. The observance of indi-
vidual laws did not seem to him of great importance, except
in so far as such laws resulted immediately from those special
doctrines ; moreover, he loved the old Arabian customs and kept
to them. The Jews on the contrary laid the greatest stress upon
the punctilious f nlfilmefit- of the revealed law, and shewed not
the slightest desire to depart itom it. While these two causes
of mutual separation were founded upon the difference in the
fundamental opinions of Muhammad and the Jews, another may
be added which arose more from an external difference. As we'
have already remarked, the Jews pressed Muhammad very hard,<
and often annoyed him with repartee and evasions, thus rousing '
in him an inextinguishable hatred. Governed by this he mis-
understood their religious doctrines, putting false constructions
upon them, and so jastifying his own deviation from them. He
wished therefore to make a final separation from these hateful
Jews, and to this end he established entirely different customs-
Later Arabians confess that he made changes * " from the

' J^b iA--A.s)\ f_fji\ &ai^j*J iSt>\/

1 58 APPENDIX.

necessity of abolishing resemblances to the Jews." ^ Thus,
Muhammad asserts that the Jews are the enemies of the
Muslims,'^ that they slew prophets,' a probable reference to/
Jesus ; further, that they in common with Christians thoughn
themselves specially favoured by God,* that they believed thai
they alone should possess Paradise,^ that they held Ezra to ba
the son of God ,5 that they trusted in the intercession of their self 1
pious predecessors,'^ that they had perverted the Bible ^ because
in its existing form that Book contained no allusions to him, and
that the Jews built temples on the graves of the prophets.' Such
accusations and the reasons given earlier supplied Muhammad
with grounds on which to justify his departure from Jewish laws.

A. 'Prayer. — Supper precedes prayer.^" This is in direct
opposition to the Talmud, which lays down exactly how long
before prayer one may eat that the hour of prayer may not
be let slip. Truly in this Muhammad wished to live so as to
please his Arabs.

JB. Laws about women, — Muhammad says : ^^ " It is lawful
for you on the night of the fast to go in unto your wives." This
is clearly prescribed in opposition to the directly contrary ruling
in the Talmudic law prohibiting cohabitation on the night before
the fast day in Abh, that being counted as part of the fast day
itself.

The laws of divorce '^ are probably identical with those of the
ancient Arabs. There is a remarkable passage in the Quran,!^.
which says that the man after he has put away his wife for th^j
second time cannot marry her again until she has married^
another man, and been divorced by him too. This is directly
contrary to the teaching of the Bible.^*

• Pooook notse Misc., ctap. 9, page 369. ' Sura V. 85.

3 Siras II. 58, V. 74. * Siira V. 21.

' Suraa II. 88, LXII. 6. * Sura IX. 30. Sunna 462.

' Sura II. 128, 135.

^ Sura 11 , 73, and other passages. ' Snnna 70 ff .

'» Surma 97 ff. " Sura II. 183.

12 Sura II, 229 ff, '3 g^j.^, n. 230,
" Deuteronomy, xxiy. 1 ff.

STATEMENTS HOSTILE TO JUDAISM, 159

The Muslims assert ' that the Jews of that period laid down
that cohabitation was to take place in the usual way. On this
Muhammad to please himself and his Arabs says : ' " Tour
■wives are your tillage, go in therefore unto your tillage in
what manner soever ye will," etc.

G. The most important and prominent change to be consi-
dered in this connection is the removal of the prohibition about
food, concerning which Muhammad asserts that it was imposed
npon the Jews only on account of their iniquity.^ (It is interest-
ing that Jesus states just the converse when he speaks of the
abolition of divorce.'') Muhammad abolishes the law about
meat in several passages,^ but holds to part of it in others,^
following it would seem the precedent of the apostles, to whom
almost the same utterance is attributed in the New Testa-
ment.^ Thus he forbids carrion, blood, swine's flesh, and that
which has been slain for an idol ; to which he adds in the first
passage, that which is not properly killed, viz., that' slain by
strangling, or by a blow from an axe, that killed by a fall from
a mountain, that which is gored, and that torn by wild beasts.
These last rules, considering the total silence about them in other
later passages, may be regarded as " abolished." ^ In another
passage ' Muhammad mentions particular meats which were
forbidden to the Jews.^"

D. Lastly, the following utterance i' of Muhammad is decid-
edly combative : " We have therein commanded them that they
should give life for life, and eye for eye, and nose for nose, and
ear for ear, and tooth for tooth ; and that wounds should also be
punished by retaliation ; but whoever should remit it as alms
it should be accepted as an atonement for him. And whoso

1 Sunna 460. ^ Sura II. 223.

3 Sura IV. 168. ^ St. Matthew, xix. 8.

5 Suras III. 44, 87, IV. 158, V. 89, 90.

^ Suras V. 4, VI. 146, XVI.116, '^ Acts, xv. 19—28.

8 ? ■* '^'

s Sura VI, 147.

1" Leviticus, xi. 3, 7, 27, ff. and 39 ff. " Sura V. 49.

160 APPENDIX.

iudgeth not according to what God hath revealed they are
unJQst." The passage of Scripture which Muhammad here haa
in mind is in Exodus ; ^ and those who do not observe it are the
Jews, in that they extend to all cases the permission to make
atonement with money, which is given only when the injured
party agrees to it. The Mishna ^ runs as follows : " If a man
has blinded another, or cut ofE his hand, or broken his foot, one
must regard the injured person as though he were a slave sold
in the market, and put a price upon him and reckon how much
he was worth before the injury and how much now, etc."

These are about all the chief points showing a consideration
of Judaism, and the collecting of them gives us another proof
that Muhammad had a personal knowledge of Judaism through
acquaintance with the Jewish manner of life and through
intercourse with the Jews.

If we now once more consider this treatise as a whole, we
shall find that by the establishment of the fact which was to
be demonstrated, viz., that Muhammad borrowed from Judaism,
we come to a clear understanding of the Quran in general
as well as of individual passages in it. Furthermore, the
state of culture of the Arabians of that day, and especially
of the Arabian Jews, is to some extent made clear, and light
is thrown upon the plan of Muhammad and upon his intellec-
tual power and knowledge by many authentic documents.
Then in collecting the passages which serve as proofs we
are compelled to dismiss at once the ill-considered confidence
with which people are apt to speak of each legend as a
dream of the rabbinical Talmudists ; for although the author
neither can nor will maintain that no passage bearing on his
thesis has escaped him in the Eabbinioal literature, still this
must be accepted as a fact until it can be proved that this

• Exodus, xxi. 23 ff. ^ Mishua Baba, Ramma viii. 1.

^bsg iniM ^Ni-i ibp'^i^ i5t? 'njTiN sj^p ia'^s-ns wrap
np; «!in na^l np; n^r^ n^s T'DaJ") piti?a -laa? nav s^n

STATEMENTS HOSTILE TO JUDAISM. 161

or that has been omitted, and thus for the present we must
attribute to some other source every thing of which the
Jewish origin has not been proved. By this, however, I do not
intend to say that everything which, according to our ideas, is
mjthical and for which a Jewish source appears to be forth-
coming, may be laid upon Judaism ; for, on the one hand,
the opinion or legend may originally have had a different
signification and it may have reached its present extravagant
development in the mouth of the people, and, on the other
hand, the source itself may have had no obligatory importance,
and therefore does not hold the same place with regard to
Judaism as the Quran holds with regard to Islam. We must
distinguish between Judaism and views derived from the
Jews ; this distinction, however, is unfortunately either from
ill-will or ignorance often not made.

And now I submit this treatise to you, honoured readers, and
your judgment will convince me of the correctness or falsity
of my opinions, and as to whether my work fulfils its end or
has failed in its purpose.

1G2

INDICES A,

INDICES.

A. — List of.Hebhew and Arabic woeds explained.

Page

34,

n3rT\a

35
40
43

35
80
36
Z7

yjlC

)?■!

,vi«JTui>ui

^Vii

5 C,

nitp'a

s c.

n^ n ,

/r,<-

(j-jj

fj^^i

"V?^

2Jn^

r^iNn Q5?

nn^n

0 J

D^-?9

f-"'

**!♦»

INDICiSS B.

B. — List of Passages cited from the Quean.

Page

Sura

II. 27

„

28-33

46-7

»>

48-52

»>

■»»

52-5

55-6

57-8

»)

-JI

63-8

67-8

»)

1»

»»

-J»

>»

118

119

126-7

127

■M

128

129

„

130

134

135

136

»l

149

■t>

181

183

Page

Sura

II. 201

223

159

120

228

121

»i

229 fE

158

230

158

120

))

233

... 69,158

240

120

)»

244

153

158

247-53

143

248

144

120, 129

249

... 32, 144

-257

136

■»

259

136

260

... 96,100

}»

261

155

158
8

262

100

Sura

III. 2

... 32, 42

120, 129

158

»j

30 £E

1S7

6,9

159

58..

60"

102

96, 106

... 20

110

107-8

... 86, 38

99, 158

i»

7,7

106

... 109, 159

127

99 158

)»

148

163

»?

172

»»

177

69,158

■It

188

€S

16i

INDICES B.

Page

Sura

III. 191

196

Sura

IV. 46

66-8

48-9

146

»)

... 15, 41

»)

)}

102

106

115

120

124

i»

1B2

... 120, 9

158

159

161

... 19, 146

162

Sura

V. 4

159

}}

163

23-9

121

})

30-6

)»

169

)»

146

})

82-3

})

))

158

>»

168

))

89-90

169

Sura

VI. 67

j»

74-82

100

»»

»)

84-6

108

Page

Sura

Stira

VI. 84

151

... 106, 155

105

146

169

147

159

157

ill. 10-18

18-25

41 a

57-63

63-71

71-8

78-83

... 101, 104

83-92

... 138, 140

... 139, 140

101-25

120

108

125

127-39

120

130

127

132

127

135-47

120

142

120

147-55

121

147

132

160

130

154

121

156-58

... 20, 33

159

132

160

120

161-62

163

166

146

168

170

120-9

174-75

142

184

INDICES B.

165

Page

Sura VIII.

Sura

IX.

XI,

. 11,154

85-6

35-6

112

115

96-98

72-5

76-90 .

120

125

90-3

.. 120,127

152

46-8

27-50 .

52-64

64-72

72-9

101

102-5

70-85

104

Page

Sura

,,
Sura

XI.

XII.

XIII.

XIV.

XV.

XVI,

85-99

140

138

139

99-102

120

4-103

111

... 109,117

108

11 ff

116

111

113

26 ff

113

31 £E

112

108

... 58,114

47-50

117

115

116

115

117

116

93-6

117

116

100-1

... 117,118

111

106

28-44

51-61

101

102

104

61-78

104

80 fE

166

INDICES B.

Page

Sura

XVI.

>»

105
116

27
169

121
124

95
95

125

Sura

XVII.

4-8 «. 75

146

60
63-8

>»

87
103

. 28,127

110

Sura

XVIIl

})

59-82 .

121

8a-99 .

136

107

55
34

^{ira

XIX

. 29

137

35
42-51 .

139
96

108

■J)

55-6

. 82,106

57
68
62

82
82
33

Sura

. 8-37 .

119

„

37-44 ... 119

44-51 .

119

50-79 .

150

126

■j,

■,j

79-82 .

120

82-99 .

121

130

-fl)

130
130

Pag-e

Sura

XX.

Sura XXI.

Sura XXII.

Sura XXIII.

Siira XXIV.

131

115

116-27

118

133

52-69

69-74

... 99,101

108

«. 145

145

81-2

146

83-4

152

85-6

106; 155

152

104

. 2

... 16, 48

85, 93, 104

140

. 8

23-32

33-44

47-51

120

... 47, 48

117

. 24

Sura XXV.

Sura XXVI.

Siira XXVII.

INDICES B.

10/

Page

Sura XXVII.

20-46 ...

147

149

46-65 ...

89, 93, 138

104

55-60 ...

104

47-48

154

9-17

119

))

89 fE

15-52

120

112

105-6

17ffi

124

S^ra XXVIII

2-29 ..

119

123

121

126

121

125

»»

123

125

137

126

123

62-69

120

123

61 ff

127

„

145

69-105

17 fE

123

100

124

137

87-8

23 fE

124

86-104

„

29-36

119

88-104

124

103-21

i»

86-40 .,

120

109

121

123-41

40-3

120

127

))

76-83 ..

121

128

133

129

Stira XXIX.

141-60

13-4 ... 85

160-76

104

>»

164

104

16-23 ..

176-92

138

17-23 ..

180

139

!»

23-7

186-7

139

196

)»

108

197

27-35 ..

104

127

80-2

101

13-5

120

»)

104

145

35-6

138

15-6

146

140

J 8-20

150

89,93

168

INDICES B.

Page

Sura XXIX.

121

Sura

XXXVIII.

29-33

149

„

35-40

146

4, 18

40-5

152

Siira XXX.

106, 155

Stira XXXI.

11 ff

. 87,101

71-86

))

)»

Siira

XXXIX.

Sura XXXII.

».

.. 22, 43

))

Sura XXXIII.

>»

68 ff

Sura

XL.

7ff

)»

183

Sura XXXIV.

145

„

24-49

120

])

11-12 ,

146

121

149

29 ff

126

33-5

149

89,93

111

Siira XXXV.

1 ... 62

Sura

XLI.

8-n

Sura XXXVI.

)»

))

„

12-18 .

.. 33, 93

))

)}

12-16 .

E6ra XXXVII

Iff

)»

151

»)

92 .

60 £E

Sura

XLII.

73-81 .

81-95 .

95-9

Sura

XLIII.

99-114 .

. 103,105

))

25-8

101

104

45-54

120

112-3 .

103

126

123

151

120

133-37 .

104

Sura

XLIV.

9fE

•«• 55

139

152

)}

43 ff

)»

189-49 .

152

Sura

XLVI.

B6ra XXXVIII

. 11 ... 89

)}

12 ... 93,138

„

16-20 ,

145

))

137

23-6

146

.. 69, 71

INDICES — B.

169

Sura

XLVI.

Sura XLVIII.

Sura

))

»)
Sura

Sara

It
Sura

Sura
Sura
Sura

tt
Sura

Sura
Sura

LI.

Liir.

LIV.

LVI.

LVII.

LX.

LXI.

LXII.

LXV.
LXVI.

16
20-B
23 £E

4
15
18
26
48
12

24-38

41-42

43-46 ,

9-18
18-22 ,
19

23-33 ,
28

33-9 ,
88

4-6 .
13

6
12
10
11
12

Page

21
89
90
40
27
40
40

152

93, 141

89, 138

46-7

101
89
90
93
89
93

85-9
89
90
91
94

104

135

32,71

158

86, 104

123

137

Sura LXVII.

Stira LXVIII.

tt
Sura LXIX.

Sura LXX.

LXXI
Sura

Sura LXXII.
Sura LXXV.
Sura LXXVII.
Sura LXXVIII.

Sura LXXIX.

Sura LXXXI.
Sura LXXXIII.
Sura LXXXV.

Sura LXXXVII,
Sura LXXXIX.

Sura XCI.

tt
Sura XOVII.
Sura C,

Sura CVII.

3
5

15
34
37
48

4-9

4-6

6fE

13 ff

1-29

Iff

15-20

20-7

4ff

5-9 .

27 ff ,

11-16 ,

Page

47
68
27
33
36
152
89
98
90
56
33
47
85
64
63
62
48
61
62
119
120
63
27

5,152
48
93
96
89

89,92
93
53
93
94
61
69
42

170

INDICES B. AND C.

C. — List of Passages cited eeom the Sunna.

Page

Snnna

70 ff

158

86-89

97 ff

158

141

148

146

896

Sunna

398

400
406
446
460
462
608
689

Page

108

137

159

164

D. — The Chief Authors cited.

Abulfeda, Annales Moslemitici.

„ Hiatoria Auteislamica.

„ Vita Mohammedis.
Assemanni, Bibliotheoa Oriental! s.
Baidhiwi, Commentary on Quran,
Bamasa, —

D'Herbelot, Bibliotheque Orientale,
Hettinger, Historia Orientalis.
Ibn Arabscha, Fakihat Eloholafa.
Pooocke, Notae MiscellaneEe.

„ Specimen Hist, Arabum.

CONSERVATION
^- 198a.

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Texts

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "Judaism and Islam. A prize essay"

See other formats